[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.158.180. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1993

Chorioretinal FoldsA Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Cases

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, the Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Drs Leahey, Brucker, and Wyszynski), and the Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Shaman).

Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(3):357-359. doi:10.1001/archopht.1993.01090030075042
Abstract

• We retrospectively reviewed the records, photographs, and fluorescein angiograms of patients with chorioretinal folds to compare features of unilateral and bilateral involvement. We studied 78 eyes of 54 patients and found that 30 (56%) of these patients had unilateral folds and 24 (44%) had bilateral folds. No significant difference was found in comparing visual acuity, refractive error, age, or race in the unilateral vs the bilateral cases. There were significantly more women in the bilateral group (P=.043). The frequency of causes of unilateral cases differed from bilateral cases, but this could not be statistically proven owing to our small sample size. This analysis contains the largest number of chorioretinal folds reported in the literature, and is the first attempt to compare unilateral and bilateral cases.

×