[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.145.218.90. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1994

Ceftazidime or Amikacin: Choice of Intravitreal Antimicrobials in the Treatment of Postoperative Endophthalmitis

Author Affiliations

Pittsburgh, Pa
Boston, Mass

Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(1):17-18. doi:10.1001/archopht.1994.01090130027002
Abstract

Recently, concern has been expressed regarding the choice of amikacin sulfate as the companion drug to vancomycin hydrochloride for intravitreal injection in the initial treatment of patients with postoperative endophthalmitis.1 The concern arises because of reports suggesting that amikacin may cause macular infarction. It has been recommended that ceftazidime be used in its place. Because of these reports, investigators and consultants of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS), sponsored by the National Eye Institute, reviewed their choice of antibiotics for intravitreous injection in the treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis.

In vitro, both amikacin and ceftazidime are highly active against gram-negative bacilli, and few strains are resistant. Data from a retrospective series of cases of endophthalmitis caused by gram-negative bacilli showed one of 35 strains resistant to amikacin and none to ceftazidime.2 So far, in the EVS, three of 21 isolates were resistant to ceftazidime and two to amikacin. Based on

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×