[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.104.49. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1995

The ERG Is Alive and Well

Author Affiliations

Stanford, Calif

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(11):1371-1372. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100110031019
Abstract

The ELECTRORETINOGRAM (ERG) is an important diagnostic tool in ophthalmology, but it is at times misunderstood. I hear regularly of patients with symptoms of retinal dysfunction who have had fluorescein angiography and sometimes magnetic resonance imaging, while an ERG was deferred for fear that the test was somehow difficult or expensive. This myth—for it is a myth—is unfortunate. The ERG takes less than an hour to perform, costs about the same as other ophthalmic diagnostic tests, and is no more disturbing to the patient than fluorescein angiography or perimetry. Even more critical, it is the most direct and objective test in ophthalmology for evaluating the function of the retina. How else can you find out, without subjectivity and without injections, how well the rods and cones are working, or whether a disease is limited to the macula?

The conventional ERG is performed by placing an electrode on the eye and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×