[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1997

A Tactical Response to the RAND Study-Reply

Author Affiliations

Washington, DC

Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(1):132-133. doi:10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150134033

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In reply  Although I share Dr Hassin's disappointment in our national failure to pass comprehensive health care system reform, I disagree with his opinion that the market size for ophthalmologic services cannot be expanded in a meaningful way without comprehensive health care system reform and universal health insurance. While he refers to my suggestions as a "blind alley," his insistence on blaming the current situation on the failure of Congress to pass the Health Security Act takes the reader down afar murkier path. Moreover, he does a grave disservice to the many professional societies who either supported the legislation as written or would have done so based on achievable modifications. Health care system reform legislation was not passed because of many complex and tragic political reasons, but intractable physician opposition was not one of them.Dr Hassin cites no evidence to support his thesis that effective marketing would be useless

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×