[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.0.26. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
November 2004

Delayed-Onset Infantile Cataracts in a Case of Treacher Collins Syndrome

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(11):1721-1722. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.11.1721

Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS), variably known as mandibulofacial dysostosisand Franceschetti-Klein-Zwahlen syndrome, is one of a number of congenitalcraniofacial abnormalities characterized by malformation of the derivativesof the first and second branchial arches. Though first described by Berry1 in 1889, the definition of the syndrome underwentfurther revision and classification by Franceschetti and Klein in 1949.2

The major features of the complete syndrome include bilateral hypoplasiaof the mandible and zygoma, antimongoloid slanting of the palpebral fissures,micrognathia, beaked nose, malformed ears, and conduction deafness. Colobomataof the lateral lower eyelids are frequently seen, and for this reason, ophthalmologistsare often consulted as part of the multidisciplinary team serving these patients.Other ocular findings, such as cataract, microphthalmos, and atresia of thelacrimal canals, are seen much less frequently.3

Although cataract has been reported in the literature as an infrequentfeature of TCS, the time of onset and morphological features of such cataractshave not been previously described. We present a case of TCS notable for delayedonset of bilateral cataracts that developed after the first year of life.

Report of a Case

A 1-month-old girl was referred for evaluation of abnormal eyelids.She was a healthy, full-term, 2400-g infant, the first child born to a healthy20-year-old mother who had no complications during pregnancy. At birth, notchesof the lower eyelid were noted, and she was referred for evaluation. Therewas no family history of ocular disease or congenital syndromes. On examination,she was found to have bilateral lower eyelid colobomas involving the lateralthird of the inferior lids (Figure 1).There were no periocular dermoids, no corneal limbal dermoids, no cataracts,and no optic nerve hypoplasia or ocular colobomas. The remainder of the ophtal- micexamination was unremarkable. She was also found to have malar hypoplasia.Given this facial appearance, the diagnosis of TCS was considered. The patientwas evaluated by the Department of Medical Genetics, which confirmed thisdiagnosis. The child did well until 13 months of age when the parents beganto notice cloudiness in the pupils of both eyes. On ophthalmic examination,she was found to have bilateral nuclear cataracts precluding view of the posteriorpole in each eye (Figure 2). There wasa small rim of clear cortex peripherally. Nys tagmus was not present.The patient underwent bilateral extracapsular cataract extraction with posteriorchamber lens implantation without complication.

Figure 1.
On examination, the patient was foundto have bilateral lower eyelid colobomas involving the lateral third of theinferior lids.

On examination, the patient was foundto have bilateral lower eyelid colobomas involving the lateral third of theinferior lids.

Figure 2.
On ophthalmic examination, the patientwas found to have bilateral nuclear cataracts precluding view of the posteriorpole in each eye.

On ophthalmic examination, the patientwas found to have bilateral nuclear cataracts precluding view of the posteriorpole in each eye.

Comment

Treacher Collins syndrome is a congenital craniofacial abnormality thataffects approximately 1 in 50 000 live births. It is transmitted by autosomaldominant inheritance with high penetrance and variable expressivity, thoughapproximately 60% of cases occur with no family history and are thought toarise by de novo mutation.

The pathogenesis of TCS was initially thought to be due to defectiveossification of the facial bones. However, the common derivation of the affectedtissues from the first and second branchial arches led to speculation thatdefects in neural crest cell migration might be responsible.4 Morerecently, it has been suggested that premature cell death in the ectodermalplacodes of the first and second branchial arches, rather than impaired migrationof neural crest cells, may instead be the pathogenetic mechanism.5

The gene responsible for TCS has recently been cloned, and a proteinproduct has been identified with homology to a family of nucleolar-cytoplasmictransport proteins.6 Almost all mutationsidentified in TCS result in premature termination of the protein product,suggesting that the pathogenetic effects result from haploinsufficiency ofthe gene product during embryogenesis. The precise function of this proteinproduct and its role in TCS pathogenesis remain unknown. As a result of thisresearch, a genetic test for prenatal diagnosis in affected families is nowavailable.

Of note, the prevalence of cataracts is variable in other craniofacialsyndromes involving malformation of the first and second branchial arches.They are seen very frequently in Hallerman-Streiff syndrome, occasionallyin Pierre Robin syndrome, and are absent in Goldenhar syndrome.7

Though the literature refers to cataract as an infrequent ophthalmicfinding in TCS, no specific caseswith cataract could be identified. Therewere no cataracts mentioned in 2 recent case series that examined the ocularfindings in 14 and 24 patients with TCS, respectively.8,9

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of delayed-onset infantilecataracts in TCS. It is significant because this child displayed no signsof cataract at birth or at 10 months of age but developed bilateral, visuallysignificant cataracts by 13 months of age. The possibility that delayed-onsetcataracts can develop rapidly in infants with TCS suggests that more frequentophthalmologic follow-up and detailed anticipatory guidance to parents arewarranted to prevent the possibility of undetected cataracts leading to irreversibleamblyopia.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Dr Fredrick, Departmentof Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, 10 Koret Way, Box0730, San Francisco, CA 94143-0730 (dfred@itsa.ucsf.edu).

Financial Disclosure: None.

References
1.
Berry  GA Two case reports. Royal London Ophthal Hosp Rep 1889;12255
2.
Franceschetti  AKlein  D The mandibulo-facial dysostosis: a new hereditary syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1949;27143- 224
3.
Hurwitz  P Mandibulofacial dysostosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1954;5169- 74Article
4.
Poswillo  D The pathogenesis of the Treacher Collins syndrome. Br J Oral Surg 1975;131- 26
PubMedArticle
5.
Sulik  KKJohnston  MCSmiley  SJSpeight  HSJarvis  BE Mandibulofacial dysostosis (Treacher Collins syndrome): a new proposalfor its pathogenesis. Am J Med Genet 1987;27359- 372
PubMedArticle
6.
Dixon  JHovanes  KShiang  RDixon  MJ Sequence analysis, identification of evolutionary conserved motifsand expression analysis of murine tcof1 provide further evidence for a potentialfunction for the gene and its human homologue, TCOF1. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6727- 737
PubMedArticle
7.
Feingold  MGellis  SS Ocular abnormalities associated with first and second arch syndromes. Surv Ophthalmol 1969;1430- 42
PubMed
8.
Wang  FMMillman  ALSidoti  PAGoldberg  RB Ocular findings in Treacher Collins syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;110280- 286
PubMed
9.
Hertle  RWZiylan  SKatowitz  JA Ophthalmic features and visual prognosis in the Treacher-Collins syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77642- 645
PubMedArticle
×