[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.207.116. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
September 2006

Keratoprosthesis in High-Risk Pediatric Corneal Transplantation: First 2 Cases

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(9):1356-1357. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.9.1356

Infants with significant corneal opacities are at risk for development of profound deprivation amblyopia without surgical intervention. Early corneal transplantation is recommended. However, penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in young children is considered a high-risk procedure. Additionally, a poorer prognosis has been described in children with congenital corneal opacities when compared with acquired corneal opacities.1,2 Allograft rejection is the cause in the great majority of pediatric graft failures.

Implantation of a keratoprosthesis, or a synthetic cornea, is considered for patients who are at high risk for donor corneal transplantations. Although significant early and late postoperative complications can occur, favorable results have been achieved in patients with a relatively healthy ocular surface, such as in cases with multiple immunologic graft failures.3

To date, keratoprosthesis implantation has been exclusively performed in adult patients. The success in children is unknown. Owing to the poor survival rate of conventional corneal transplantations in this group, we performed keratoprosthesis implantation in 2 infants with congenital corneal opacities and glaucoma to overcome deprivation amblyopia. In this article, we describe our short-term results.

Report of Cases

Case 1. A 21-month-old girl with bilateral Peters' anomaly and associated glaucoma had undergone multiple surgical procedures in both eyes elsewhere. Initial examination under anesthesia revealed phthisis with hypotony of the right eye. The left eye had a small, opaque corneal graft with extensive neovascularization and a central epithelial defect. The intraocular pressure was 42 mm Hg. B-scan ultrasonography revealed aphakia, posterior vitreous detachment, and a thickened ocular wall. At age 22 months, the patient underwent a pars plana vitrectomy, epiretinal membrane peeling, Baerveldt tube shunt insertion, and implantation of a permanent keratoprosthesis in the left eye (Figure).

Figure.
Appearance of the keratoprosthesis under the operating microscope during an examination under general anesthesia in patient 1.

Appearance of the keratoprosthesis under the operating microscope during an examination under general anesthesia in patient 1.

Case 2. A 7-day-old boy was evaluated for congenital glaucoma. Examination under anesthesia revealed complete corneal opacification and an intraocular pressure of 40 mm Hg bilaterally. Ultrasonography suggested advanced cupping of the optic nerves. Trabeculotomy was performed in both eyes. At age 2 months, follow-up examination under general anesthesia revealed persistence of the elevated intraocular pressures, necessitating repeat bilateral trabeculotomy and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. However, despite maximal topical treatment using latanoprost, dorzolamide hydrochloride–timolol maleate, and brimonidine tartrate, a tube shunt procedure had to be performed owing to the uncontrolled intraocular pressures. At age 4 months, the patient underwent a pars plana vitrectomy, lensectomy, Baerveldt tube shunt procedure, and permanent keratoprosthesis placement in the right eye. The left eye had a small area of relatively clear cornea in the inferotemporal quadrant and subsequently underwent a large optical sectoral iridectomy combined with a tube shunt procedure.

Surgical Technique and Postoperative Care. Adequate informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents after extensive discussions regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure as compared with conventional corneal transplantation.

The devices were supplied by Dr Claes Dohlman, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston. Placement of the permanent keratoprosthesis was performed using the standard technique as described previously, using a donor corneal button oversized by 1 mm.4

The postoperative regimen included 14 mg/mL of vancomycin hydrochloride 4 times daily, ofloxacin 4 times daily, 1% medroxyprogesterone acetate 4 times daily, 1% prednisolone acetate every 2 hours, combination dorzolamide-timolol twice daily, and erythromycin ointment every night. The patients were fitted with polycarbonate protective goggles. After the first 2 months, the eyedrops were each tapered to twice daily. The combination dorzolamide-timolol was discontinued after removal of the suture of the tube shunt at around 4 weeks.

An examination under general anesthesia was performed at approximately 1 and 4 weeks after the surgery and as necessary thereafter. Intraocular pressure was measured using a Tono-Pen XL tonometer (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, Fla) over the peripheral cornea. Retinoscopy and fitting of a large soft contact lens (Kontur Kontact Lens Co, Inc, Richmond, Calif) was performed at 1 week postoperatively.

Results

Shortly after the removal of the suture blocking the Baerveldt tube shunt, patient 1 was found to have significant hypotony with choroidal detachments. The tube had to be occluded using a 6-0 Vicryl suture (Ethicon, Inc, Piscataway, NJ) 3 mm posterior to the limbus. Subsequent examination under general anesthesia revealed a dense retroprosthetic membrane with no view of the fundus. B-scan ultrasonography revealed a total choroidal and retinal detachment. The patient underwent revision of a pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling, scleral buckle, fluid-air exchange, endolaser photocoagulation, and silicone oil tamponade. Two months following the retinal detachment repair, an avascular retroprosthetic membrane was noted. This thin membrane was successfully treated with Nd:YAG capsulotomy without complications. The keratoprosthesis remained in place 15 months after the surgery, allowing for a clear view of the fundus. The eye remained soft to palpation, with an intraocular pressure of less than 10 mm Hg as measured by the Tono-Pen. The patient currently wears a contact lens of +26 diopters (D) for refractive purposes. The patient's vision is hand motions.

No postoperative complications occurred in patient 2. The most recent examination under general anesthesia 14 months following placement of the keratoprosthesis revealed a well-positioned keratoprosthesis and tube shunt in the right eye with a clear view of the fundus. The sectoral iridectomy temporally in the left eye allowed for a clear view of the fundus. The intraocular pressures remained in the high teens and low 20s in both eyes. The optic cups were large but improved to a cup-disc ratio of 0.7, and the rims were intact. The patient wears a contact lens of −4 D OD and is able to fixate and follow with each eye.

Comment

Although congenital corneal opacities in the pediatric population are infrequent, they pose a great challenge for cornea specialists owing to the difficulties in surgical management. Poor prognostic categories in the PK pediatric group include young age (particularly <1 year) at the time of transplantation, children with anterior segment dysgeneses such as Peters' anomaly, associated comorbidity such as glaucoma, and regrafting.

Keratoprosthesis implantation has the goal of replacing the central cornea with a clear optical cylinder made of an immunologically inert material. Therefore, allograft rejection does not occur with the keratoprosthesis. Another significant advantage is that the keratoprosthesis maintains a spherical anterior shape. Furthermore, the Boston type I keratoprosthesis, a polymethyl methacrylate device, can be custom made such that it can correct for refractive errors as well as aphakia. These advantages are particularly important in cases of pediatric PK. Immunologic graft rejection in children can be insidious and often eludes parents' detection. Maintaining a clear visual axis while minimizing the induced astigmatism in the immediate postoperative period may minimize the development of amblyopia in this age group. The goal in cases of significant bilateral congenital corneal opacity is to minimize the amount of time that a child is not seeing clearly until he or she nears the end of the amblyopic age range. Theoretically, keratoprosthesis implantation may provide faster and superior visual results as compared with conventional donor corneal transplantation. The device can possibly be removed and replaced by a PK when the child is out of the amblyopic age range.

Corneal blindness remains the leading cause of pediatric blindness globally.5,6 In particular, infectious keratitis is the most common cause of corneal scarring in developing countries. Importantly, in the majority of these cases, the occurrence of corneal opacification is associated with poverty in areas devoid of eyebanking and transplantation-quality corneas. Regrettably, no significant developments in pediatric corneal transplantation have been achieved in recent years, and the results of pediatric PK remain poor even in developed countries. Although the postoperative complications may be severe enough to limit the use of currently available devices, we believe that the keratoprosthesis might have a role in the management of corneal blindness in carefully selected children with complex ocular diseases who are at high risk for graft failure.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Dr Akpek, Ocular Surface and Dry Eye Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, 600 N Wolfe St, Maumenee Building No. 317, Baltimore, MD 21287-9238 (esakpek@jhmi.edu).

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by a William and Mary Greve Scholarship from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc (Dr Akpek), and the Director's Discovery Fund of the Wilmer Eye Institute (Dr Akpek).

Previous Presentation: This work was presented in part at the Cornea Society Meeting in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; October 23, 2004; New Orleans, La.

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to Drs Claes H. Dohlman and James V. Aquavella for their help and support during the performance of the surgical procedures.

References
1.
Brady  SERapuano  CJArentsen  JJCohen  EJLaibson  PR Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty 1983-1988. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108118- 122
PubMed
2.
Aasuri  MKGarg  PGokhle  NGupta  S Penetrating keratoplasty in children. Cornea 2000;19140- 144
PubMedArticle
3.
Yaghouti  FNouri  MAbad  JCPower  WJDoane  MGDohlman  CH Keratoprosthesis: pre operative prognostic categories. Cornea 2001;2019- 23
PubMedArticle
4.
Dohlman  CHPower  WJ Keratoprosthesis. In:Albert  DMJacobiec  FAeds. Principals and Practice of Ophthalmology.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co2000;1069- 1078
5.
Kello  ABGilbert  C Causes of severe visual impairment and blindness in children in schools for the blind in Ethiopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87526- 530
PubMedArticle
6.
Titiyal  JSPal  NMurthy  GV  et al.  Causes and temporal trends of blindness and severe visual impairment in children in schools for the blind in North India. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87941- 945
PubMedArticle
×