Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA) results following vitreoretinal surgery in patients receiving warfarin therapy with subtherapeutic and borderline therapeutic levels of anticoagulation. CF indicates counting fingers; HM, hand motion; NLP, no light perception.
Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA) results following vitreoretinal surgery in patients receiving warfarin therapy with highly therapeutic and therapeutic levels of anticoagulation. CF indicates counting fingers; HM, hand motion; NLP, no light perception.
Dayani PN, Grand MG. Maintenance of Warfarin Anticoagulation for Patients Undergoing Vitreoretinal Surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(11):1558-1565. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.11.1558
To evaluate the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with vitreoretinal surgery in patients whose warfarin sodium therapy was continued throughout the surgical period.
A review of 1737 records of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy was conducted. Inclusion criteria included patients receiving warfarin therapy whose international normalized ratios (INRs) were elevated above normal values on the day of surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhagic complications were documented.
Fifty-four patients underwent 57 vitreoretinal surgical procedures with warfarin therapy and were divided into groups as follows: group S with INRs of 1.20 to 1.49, values considered subtherapeutic; group B with INRs of 1.50 to 1.99, values considered borderline therapeutic; group T with INRs of 2.00 to 2.49, values considered therapeutic; and group HT with INRs of 2.50 or greater, values considered highly therapeutic. No patients experienced anesthesia-related or intraoperative hemorrhagic complications. Two (7.7%) of 26 eyes in group S and 2 (16.7%) of 12 eyes in group HT experienced postoperative hemorrhages. All of the patients with vitreous hemorrhages had spontaneous clearing without additional treatment.
Many patients may safely undergo vitreoretinal surgery while maintaining therapeutic levels of warfarin anticoagulation. We experienced no intraoperative hemorrhagic complications; the 4 postoperative complications resolved spontaneously without persistent visual sequelae or the need for supplemental surgery.
Warfarin sodium (Coumadin; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, New York, NY) anticoagulation is generally used for the management of potentially life-threatening diseases. Experience regarding the safety of vitreoretinal procedures in patients in whom warfarin anticoagulation has been maintained is limited. Maintenance of anticoagulation during surgery for such patients may be associated with an increased risk of intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage. However, discontinuation may subject patients to the risk of systemic complications such as embolic disease or cerebrovascular accident. Therefore, decisions regarding maintenance, modification, or perioperative discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy pose a significant dilemma for the ophthalmic surgeon. The purpose of this study is to provide further information regarding the results of vitreoretinal surgery in patients in whom warfarin therapy was continued throughout the surgical period.
Approval was granted by the Washington University Medical Center Human Studies Committee, St Louis, Mo, for a retrospective review of patient records. A review of 1737 consecutive records of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy performed by surgeons of the Barnes Retina Institute, St Louis, for any cause from January 1, 2004, through December 20, 2005, was conducted. Inclusion criteria included those patients receiving warfarin therapy whose international normalized ratio (INR) and prothrombin time (PT) were elevated above normal values on the day of vitreoretinal surgery. Surgical procedures that occurred prior to January 1, 2004, in the identified patients were also included if patients had an elevated INR at the time of that procedure. Concomitant use of other anticoagulants such as clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, and Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ) and aspirin were noted. Data collected included age, sex, the reason warfarin anticoagulation therapy was used, the preoperative vitreoretinal diagnosis for which surgery was indicated, the type of surgery (including the vitreous technique and the use of additional surgical techniques such as scleral buckling), and the method of anesthesia (subdivided into general anesthesia or local infiltration with monitored anesthesia care [MAC]). Preoperative and postoperative nonstandardized Snellen visual acuities were determined. The INR at the time of surgery was collected and PT and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were recorded when available. Intraoperative hemorrhages were reported by the surgeon and recorded in the operative note. Postoperative hemorrhagic complications were defined as bleeding that was detected on the first postoperative day or within 1 month following the operation.
The retrospective record review detected 54 patients who underwent 57 vitreoretinal surgical procedures while receiving warfarin anticoagulation therapy. These patients' records were subdivided into 4 groups based on their INRs obtained on the day of surgery. Group S included patients whose INRs ranged from 1.20 to 1.49, values that were considered subtherapeutic. Group B included patients whose INRs ranged from 1.50 to 1.99, values that were considered borderline therapeutic. Group T included patients whose INRs ranged from 2.00 to 2.49, values that were considered therapeutic. Group HT included patients whose INRs were 2.50 or greater, values that were considered highly therapeutic.
Twenty-four patients undergoing 26 vitreoretinal procedures had a mean INR of 1.30 (range, 1.20-1.49). Patients in this group had a mean PT of 16.0 seconds (range, 15.0-17.5 seconds). One patient had an abnormal PTT equal to 38.8 seconds (the normal PTT is 35.0 seconds). Patients receiving other concomitant medications associated with prolonged bleeding included 2 patients receiving aspirin and 2 receiving Plavix. The group included 15 men and 9 women with a mean age of 72 years (range, 51-93 years) (Table 1).
The underlying systemic causes requiring warfarin anticoagulation included atrial fibrillation (14 patients), cardiac valve surgery (3 patients), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (2 patients), coronary artery disease status after bypass (1 patient), unspecified cardiac arrhythmia (1 patient), and unknown (3 patients). The preoperative vitreoretinal diagnoses included vitreous hemorrhage (8 patients), 4 of which were attributed to proliferative diabetic retinopathy, 2 with an associated tear and retinal detachment, 1 with associated central retinal vein occlusion, and 1 with hemorrhage secondary to exudative age-related macular degeneration. The remaining surgical indications included epiretinal membrane (6 patients), macular hole (5 patients), subretinal hemorrhage associated with age-related macular degeneration (3 patients), chronic vitritis (2 patients), retinal detachment (1 patient), and diabetic retinopathy with retinal detachment (1 patient).
Twenty-five eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy. Of these, 16 eyes had vitrectomy associated with membrane peeling, 1 had an additional scleral buckling procedure, and 1 underwent administration of subretinal tissue plasminogen activator. One eye underwent a combination of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and vitrectomy. Five procedures were managed using general anesthesia and 21 using local infiltration of anesthesia with MAC. A standard 3-port 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was used for 24 eyes whereas 25-gauge vitrectomy was used for 2 eyes. Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to light perception, and postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to hand motion. Preoperative and postoperative distribution of visual acuities is shown in Figure 1.
There were no intraoperative or anesthetic complications. Postoperatively, 1 patient had a recurrent vitreous hemorrhage on the first postoperative day. Follow-up by his local physician indicated spontaneous clearing of the hemorrhage. This patient's INR was 1.28 at the time of surgery for an extramacular subretinal hematoma with overlying vitreous hemorrhage. The surgical procedures included fine-needle aspiration biopsy as well as vitrectomy. A second patient with an INR of 1.41 had a recurrent vitreous hemorrhage 2 weeks following surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy with vitreous hemorrhage. The surgical procedure was vitrectomy with membrane peeling, peripheral cryopexy, and endolaser. The hemorrhage spontaneously cleared; however, at 7 weeks postoperatively, this patient experienced a second vitreous hemorrhage that also spontaneously cleared (Table 1).
Eleven patients undergoing 12 vitreoretinal procedures had a mean INR of 1.70 (range, 1.50-1.99). Patients in this group had a mean PT of 19.9 seconds (range, 17.7-21.9 seconds).
Four patients also had an abnormal PTT, with values ranging from 35.6 to 46.8 seconds (the normal PTT is 35.0 seconds). Concomitant medications included aspirin in 1 patient and Plavix in 1. The group included 9 men and 2 women with a mean age of 73 years (range, 41-85 years) (Table 2).
The underlying systemic causes requiring warfarin anticoagulation included atrial fibrillation (4 patients), cardiac valve surgery (1 patient), DVT with pulmonary embolism (2 patients), aortic aneurysms and coronary artery bypass surgery (1 patient), unspecified arrhythmia (1 patient), and unknown (2 patients). The preoperative vitreoretinal diagnoses included vitreous hemorrhage (1 patient), retinal detachment (6 patients), epiretinal membrane (2 patients), chronic vitritis (1 patient), tractional retinal detachment (1 patient), and retained silicone oil (1 patient). Eleven eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy procedures; 4 eyes were associated with membrane peeling, 2 with scleral buckling, and 2 with pars plana lensectomy. One patient underwent vitrectomy for silicone oil removal. General anesthesia was used in 4 patients and local infiltration anesthesia with MAC in 8. The surgical techniques involved standard 3-port 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in 11 procedures and 25-gauge vitrectomy in 1 procedure.
Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to hand motions, and postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to counting fingers. The distribution of preoperative and postoperative visual acuities is shown in Figure 1.
There were no anesthetic complications. No patients in this group developed intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhagic complications.
Seven patients undergoing a total of 7 vitreoretinal procedures had a mean INR of 2.10 (range, 2.00-2.49). The mean PT was 24.0 seconds (range, 22.8-26.0 seconds). One patient had an abnormal PTT of 46.1 seconds (the normal PTT is 35.0 seconds). Concomitant medications included aspirin in 1 patient, celecoxib (Celebrex; Pfizer, Inc, New York) in 2, and rofecoxib (Vioxx; Merck and Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ) in 1. The group comprised 5 men and 2 women with a mean age of 58 years and a median age of 68 years (range, 8-72 years) (Table 3).
The underlying systemic causes requiring warfarin anticoagulation included atrial fibrillation (2 patients), DVT (1 patient), heart transplantation with a prosthetic valve (1 patient), cardiac valve surgery (1 patient), and unknown (2 patients). The preoperative vitreoretinal diagnoses included retinal detachment (6 patients) and retained silicone oil (1 patient). The surgical procedure was pars plana vitrectomy in 6 patients, with associated membrane peeling in 5, scleral buckling in 4, and lensectomy in 1. One patient underwent silicone oil removal by means of pars plana vitrectomy. The surgical technique involved standard 3-port 20-gauge vitrectomy in all of the patients. General anesthesia was used in 3 patients and local infiltrative anesthesia with MAC in 4. Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to counting fingers, and postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to no light perception. The distribution of preoperative and postoperative acuities is shown in Figure 2.
There were no anesthetic complications. No patients in this group developed intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhages.
Twelve patients undergoing 12 vitreoretinal procedures had a mean INR of 2.80 (range, 2.50-3.60). Patients in this group had a mean PT of 29.4 seconds (range, 26.3-36.4 seconds). Six patients had an associated abnormal PTT, with values ranging from 40.2 to 73.4 seconds. Concomitant medications included aspirin in 1 patient and Celebrex in 1. The group included 10 men and 2 women with a mean age of 67 years (range, 42-79 years) (Table 4).
The underlying systemic causes requiring anticoagulation were atrial fibrillation (5 patients), DVT with pulmonary embolism (3 patients), valve replacement surgery (3 patients), and an unspecified arrhythmia (1 patient). The preoperative vitreoretinal diagnoses included retinal detachment in 5 patients (1 of whom had an associated vitreous hemorrhage) and vitreous hemorrhage without retinal detachment in 4 patients (3 of whom had proliferative diabetic retinopathy). One patient with proliferative diabetic retinopathy had iris neovascularization with secondary glaucoma and hyphema. Other diagnoses included epiretinal membrane (1 patient), retained lens fragments (1 patient), and macular edema (1 patient). The surgical procedure was pars plana vitrectomy in all 12 patients, with associated membrane peeling in 3, removal of lens fragments in 1, anterior chamber washout in 1, and scleral buckling in 1. The surgical technique was standard 3-port 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in 11 patients and 25-gauge vitrectomy in 1. General anesthesia was used in 1 patient, and 11 patients underwent local infiltrative anesthesia with MAC.
Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to light perception, and postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to counting fingers. The distribution of preoperative and postoperative visual acuities is shown in Figure 2.
In this group, there were no anesthetic complications. No patients experienced intraoperative hemorrhagic complications. Postoperatively, 2 patients (16.7%) were noted to have an intraocular hemorrhage. One patient with an INR of 2.68 and a normal PTT underwent surgery for proliferative retinopathy with vitreous hemorrhage. This patient had hemorrhage in the inferior vitreous cavity at 1 week postoperatively, and it spontaneously resolved without therapy over the ensuing 2 months. A second patient with an INR of 2.69 underwent surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy with iris neovascularization, hyphema, and vitreous hemorrhage. This patient had vitreous hemorrhage and hyphema postoperatively. It was unclear whether this hemorrhage represented residual or recurrent bleeding. A nasal choroidal detachment was also noted on the first postoperative day; however, it was not determined whether the detachment was hemorrhagic or serous. The hyphema, vitreous hemorrhage, and choroidal detachment resolved spontaneously without additional treatment.
Warfarin is an anticoagulant typically used in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, mechanical or diseased heart valves, cardioembolic cerebroischemic events, and acute myocardial infarction. When planning elective surgery, the surgeon must consider the alternatives of maintenance, ie, modification or discontinuation of anticoagulation. It is of singular importance to evaluate the rationale for which the patient is receiving anticoagulation therapy. Patients at low risk of thromboembolic disease include those with a history of DVT after 3 months without high-risk factors, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, or cardiomyopathy without atrial fibrillation. Those at high risk for thromboembolic disease are patients with hypercoagulable states, mechanical valves, DVT with high-risk factors or of recent history, or atrial fibrillation with high-risk factors such as a history of prior thromboembolic episodes, heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, mitral stenosis, thyroid disease, or age greater than 75 years with a history of diabetes or hypertension.1,2
There is no current consensus regarding the management of patients undergoing elective surgery while receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy. The primary concern associated with the discontinuation of anticoagulation prior to surgery is the increased risk of thromboembolism and cerebrovascular accident. There is also concern regarding life-threatening rebound hypercoaguability following the abrupt cessation of anticoagulation.3- 5These concerns need to be weighed against the potential for hemorrhagic complications that may occur during or following surgery.
Maintenance of anticoagulation has been shown to be safe in elective, nonocular surgical procedures including cholecystectomy,6gastric resection,6and dental extractions.7,8
Kallio et al9studied the risk of hemorrhagic complications related to ocular anesthesia. In a series of 1383 patients undergoing intraocular surgery, 76 patients were receiving warfarin. This study showed no predisposition to hemorrhage associated with either retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia.
Current articles concerning the risk of hemorrhagic ocular complications with ophthalmic surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy have mixed results. Some studies10- 13have found an increased risk of bleeding whereas others9,14- 25have not. Most articles9,14- 25suggest that warfarin therapy may be safe in patients undergoing cataract or oculoplastic surgery. In a review of 19 283 cataract procedures, Katz et al18identified 752 patients receiving warfarin therapy. In this study, there were no ocular hemorrhages among those receiving warfarin, whether treatment was discontinued within 4 days of surgery or not. In a series of 41 patients receiving anticoagulation therapy and undergoing a range of 50 ophthalmic procedures, McCormack et al15found no significant hemorrhagic complications associated with anesthesia or surgery. Gainey et al10also reviewed the outcomes of 50 patients receiving warfarin therapy and undergoing ocular surgery. There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic complications observed among patients in whom warfarin therapy was continued and those in whom it was discontinued. In a review of patients undergoing cataract surgery, Jonas et al25found that 21 patients receiving systemic anticoagulation with warfarin sodium (Coumadin) had no increased risk of intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage.
The existing literature regarding the safety of vitreoretinal procedures in patients in whom aspirin therapy or warfarin anticoagulation is maintained is limited. Flaxel and Blach26described 3 patients treated with aspirin who experienced intraocular hemorrhage during vitreoretinal surgery. In the series of 50 ophthalmic procedures described by McCormack et al,15there were no hemorrhagic complications among the 8 patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery. In a series of 50 patients who received warfarin anticoagulation therapy, Gainey et al10described 6 patients who underwent vitreoretinal procedures and had no hemorrhagic complications. However, Narendran and Williamson11described 7 patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery while receiving anticoagulation therapy. Two of the 7 patients had hemorrhagic complications, including 1 postoperative hemorrhagic choroidal detachment and 1 recurrent vitreous hemorrhage. Narendran and Williamson concluded that warfarin anticoagulation was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. The review by McDonald27of vitreoretinal surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy included 12 patients whose INRs were 2.0 or greater. One patient in this group had a subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of subretinal fluid in the course of scleral buckling.
In our study, we describe 54 patients who underwent 57 vitreoretinal procedures. We found 35 patients who had INRs ranging from 1.20 to 1.90, values that we considered subtherapeutic or borderline therapeutic. These 35 patients underwent 38 vitreoretinal procedures. There were no intraoperative hemorrhagic complications. In this group, 2 procedures (5.3%) in patients with INRs of 1.28 and 1.41 were associated with postoperative hemorrhage but required no additional surgery. There were 19 patients with INRs of 2.00 or greater who underwent 19 vitreoretinal procedures. In this group, there were no intraoperative hemorrhagic complications. Two patients (10.5%) with INRs of 2.68 and 2.69 experienced postoperative hemorrhagic complications. The complications in both patients resolved spontaneously, requiring no additional surgery. It is noteworthy that among the 4 patients with postoperative hemorrhagic complications, 1 had an elevated PTT of 55.3 seconds and another was receiving concurrent aspirin therapy.
Our surgical technique for these patients was identical to that used in patients who did not receive anticoagulation therapy. Meticulous bipolar diathermy was used to control bleeding during the initial exposure of the globe and during isolation of muscles in those patients undergoing scleral buckling in addition to vitrectomy. Scleral buckling procedures, especially those involving encirclage, require considerably more dissection with the potential for greater intraoperative bleeding. However, unusual degrees of bleeding were not encountered during such dissections in these patients. Prior to performing sclerotomies in the course of vitrectomy, episcleral vessels were diathermized. Dissection of retinal fibrovascular proliferation was accompanied by intraocular diathermy. It is possible that the postoperative hemorrhages seen in our patients were related to bleeding from sclerotomies or incisions into fibrovascular proliferative stalks. However, no such bleeding occurred intraoperatively.
Subretinal hemorrhage is a known complication of external drainage during scleral buckling procedures. In the series by McDonald,271 patient developed subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of subretinal fluid in the course of a scleral buckling procedure. In our series, 3 patients with INRs of 1.20 to 1.90 underwent scleral buckling as a component of their vitreoretinal surgery, and in those patients considered to have therapeutic levels of anticoagulation with INRs of 2.00 or greater, 5 patients underwent scleral buckling in addition to vitrectomy. It is important to note that external drainage was not attempted in any of the patients in this series who underwent scleral buckling in conjunction with vitrectomy. Instead, flattening of the retina was achieved with internal drainage and gas tamponade. We experienced no intraoperative bleeding associated with these measures and no postoperative hemorrhagic complications in patients who underwent scleral buckling in conjunction with vitrectomy.
In this series in which 13 procedures were performed using general anesthesia and 44 using local infiltration of anesthesia with MAC, no anesthetic complications were encountered. The technique we used for administration of local infiltrative anesthesia consists of topical anesthesia followed by intravenous sedation. Using a sharp 30-gauge needle, a subconjunctival injection results in the elevation of a bleb of conjunctiva. A small limbal incision can then be made to allow blunt dissection of the Tenon capsule through which a blunt-tipped curved cannula may be passed into the sub-Tenon space. Infiltration of local anesthesia can then be accomplished, resulting in adequate anesthesia and akinesia for vitreoretinal surgery and thus avoiding potential hazards of hemorrhage associated with retrobulbar injections.
The use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has been postulated to increase the risk of bleeding in patients treated with warfarin. This risk is increased by multiple mechanisms, including interference with platelet function through inhibition of cyclooxygenase 1.28The use of cyclooxygenase 2–selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may lead to fewer complications, as these agents do not interfere with platelet function. No patients in our series receiving cyclooxygenase 2 therapy developed new postoperative hemorrhagic complications.
To our knowledge, this is the single largest study to date of vitreoretinal surgical procedures in patients who had therapeutic levels of warfarin anticoagulation. The study is limited in that it was conducted in a retrospective fashion, the sample size was small, and there was no control group. Studies such as this may suffer from selection bias. Our study did not randomize patients into groups for whom warfarin therapy was continued vs those for whom it was discontinued. This article is the result of an observational study to determine the risk of hemorrhage in a group of patients for whom surgery was performed while maintaining warfarin therapy. Additionally, we were unable to collect data regarding whether the patients ingested herbal supplements known to have an anticoagulation effect or to potentiate the effects of warfarin anticoagulation.29However, it would seem logical that the concomitant use of such supplements would increase rather than decrease the risk of intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage and would be unlikely to skew results toward fewer hemorrhagic complications.
Our findings suggest that many patients may safely undergo vitreoretinal surgery while maintaining therapeutic levels of warfarin anticoagulation. In our series, no patient had an intraoperative hemorrhagic complication. Four eyes (7.0%) experienced postoperative hemorrhages that resolved spontaneously without persistent visual sequelae or the need for supplemental surgery. The ultimate visual results for our patients were quite favorable (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Based on these findings, when caring for patients in whom the systemic risks of cessation of anticoagulation therapy may be substantial, ophthalmic surgeons may wish to consider undertaking vitreoretinal procedures while maintaining anticoagulation therapy. Anesthetic and surgical techniques may need to be modified or adjusted to avoid maneuvers thought to increase the risk of hemorrhage. The decision to withhold, modify, or continue anticoagulation should be individualized, taking into consideration the patient's medical history, systemic findings, and the specific surgical procedure required for management of the underlying vitreoretinal abnormality. Consultation with the physician responsible for monitoring the patient's anticoagulation is prudent. Finally, such patients must be fully informed of the risks involved with either maintenance or discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy.
Correspondence: M. Gilbert Grand, MD, Barnes Retina Institute, 1600 S Brentwood Blvd, Suite 800, St Louis, MO 63144 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Submitted for Publication: July 14, 2006; final revision received August 22, 2006; accepted August 30, 2006.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Previous Presentation: This paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Ophthalmological Society; May 23, 2006; Half Moon Bay, Calif.