[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.159.27. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
May 2007

Ocular Trauma From Nail Gun Cartridge Wire

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(5):701-703. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.5.701

Nail guns are potentially lethal tools1,2 that fire nails in rapid succession at high velocity. The nail cartridges are held together with wire, plastic, glue, tape, or paper. When wire is used, the 2 carrier wires (Figure 1) are called the wire collation. As the nail is fired, these 2 wires are sheared off, leaving 2 barblike pieces of wire (<6 mm) attached to the nail. The 2 pieces are then sheared off the nail as it penetrates the surface.

Figure 1.
A nail-gun cartridge held together with 2 carrier wires, called the wire collation. A, Segment of nail strip showing the leading edge of the wire collation (arrow). B, A nail after being shot from nail gun but not having penetrated a surface, showing the wire collation still attached to the nail. C, Piece of wire collation sheared off from the nail after striking surface, shown against a centimeter scale.

A nail-gun cartridge held together with 2 carrier wires, called the wire collation. A, Segment of nail strip showing the leading edge of the wire collation (arrow). B, A nail after being shot from nail gun but not having penetrated a surface, showing the wire collation still attached to the nail. C, Piece of wire collation sheared off from the nail after striking surface, shown against a centimeter scale.

Ocular nail-gun injuries reported so far describe nails as the cause of injury.3,4 To our knowledge, there have been no reported ocular injuries from the wire collation. We believe that flying pieces of wire collation from nail guns represent a previously unreported risk of ocular injury. In this article, we report 3 consecutive patients with penetrating ocular injuries from short pieces of wire ejected while using nail guns.

Report of Cases

Case 1. A 45-year-old man was using a nail gun to secure siding boards onto a house when a piece of wire collation penetrated his right eye. Eye protection was not being used. The patient reported immediate pain and decreased vision. Visual acuity was 20/800 OD and 20/20 OS. Slitlamp examination of the right eye showed a metal wire perforating the cornea, with one end embedded in the lens and the other protruding about 2 mm from the cornea. A traumatic cataract was present. The corneal wound was Seidel negative. The fundus could not be visualized. Computed tomography showed a 6-mm, linear, metallic foreign body penetrating the right globe and lodged in the anterior chamber (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Computed tomographic scan, axial section, of the right orbit of case 1 showing an approximately 6-mm metal foreign body (arrow) perforating the cornea and embedded in the anterior chamber.

Computed tomographic scan, axial section, of the right orbit of case 1 showing an approximately 6-mm metal foreign body (arrow) perforating the cornea and embedded in the anterior chamber.

The patient underwent removal of the foreign body and repair of the corneal laceration, followed 1 week later by cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. One week postoperatively, visual acuity was 6 ft/200 OD, improving with a pinhole to 20/200. Slitlamp examination showed a sealed corneal wound with corneal edema, 2 to 30 cells per high-power field in the anterior chamber, and a well-centered posterior chamber intraocular lens with intact posterior capsule. The patient was subsequently lost to follow-up.

Case 2. A 36-year-old man was nailing plywood above his head with a nail gun when he felt sharp pain in the right eye. He had lowered his protective eyewear because of fogging. The patient saw a piece of wire protruding from the cornea and removed it (using a needle-nose pliers) prior to seeking care.

Visual acuity was 20/30 OD and 20/20 OS. Slitlamp examination of the right eye showed an approximately 1.5-mm paracentral full-thickness corneal wound that was Seidel positive. The anterior chamber was formed with 3 to 40 cells per high-power field and flare. There was an iris transillumination defect underlying the corneal wound. The lens was clear and the anterior capsule was intact. Intraocular pressure was 11 mm Hg OD and 15 mm Hg OS. Dilated fundus examination was normal.

The corneal wound was glued and a bandage contact lens placed on the cornea. On the fourth day, the patient was diagnosed with endophthalmitis and underwent treatment with anterior chamber and vitreous tap and intravitreal injection of antibiotics. Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans streptococci were isolated from the vitreous tap. This was followed by a pars plana vitrectomy, lensectomy, membrane peel, and intraocular antibiotic injection. At the 9-month follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 OD.

Case 3. A 26-year-old man was using a nail gun to secure siding boards onto a house when a piece of wire collation penetrated his left eye. His protective eyewear had “slipped down” while he was nailing overhead. The patient experienced pain and decreased vision.

Visual acuity was 20/20 OD and 20/100 OS. Slitlamp examination of the left eye showed a full-thickness paracentral corneal wound with a piece of metal wire piercing the lens with one end in the anterior chamber and the other in the anterior vitreous (Figure 3). An orbit radiograph confirmed a 5-mm metal foreign body overlying the globe (Figure 4).

Figure 3.
Color photograph of case 3 showing a metal foreign body (arrow) in the anterior chamber and lens.

Color photograph of case 3 showing a metal foreign body (arrow) in the anterior chamber and lens.

Figure 4.
Plain radiograph of case 3 showing an approximately 5-mm foreign body (arrow) overlying the left globe.

Plain radiograph of case 3 showing an approximately 5-mm foreign body (arrow) overlying the left globe.

The patient underwent a pars plana vitrectomy, lensectomy, intraocular foreign body removal, and corneal wound repair. This was followed by a secondary intraocular lens placement. At the 5-month follow-up, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 OS.

Comment

Three patients with full-thickness corneal wounds and intraocular foreign bodies resulting from nail-gun wire were seen in our department within the last year. None had effective eye protection at the time of injury, and 2 were nailing above eye level.

The size of the wire collation (about 1 mm × 6 mm) and its sharp end, caused by shearing from the main coil, possibly increase the likelihood that it will penetrate the eye and be retained, should it impact with sufficient velocity. Therefore, it is important to rule out an intraocular foreign body. A fine-cut computed tomographic scan may be helpful in evaluating the location of the wire within the globe. On the other hand, because the wire is relatively thin, the intraocular tissue damage at entry is limited, resulting in potentially good postinjury vision.

The position and angle at which the nails were fired may have contributed to the injuries. When firing straight ahead or downward, the sheared-off wire collation may not have the velocity or trajectory to injure the eye, whereas when firing above eye level, the face lies in the path of the wire collation pieces. Even with eye protection, the potential risk is higher because of the downward path of these small projectiles.

We believe that penetrating ocular injuries from nail-gun wire is a previously unreported risk of operating nail guns by improper technique or without protective eyewear. With models being designed for home use by nonprofessionals, the need to educate users about these risks and appropriate safety precautions is greater than ever.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Dr Bhandari, Department of Ophthalmology, Box 356485, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195 (bhandari@u.washington.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Bhandari had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

References
1.
Opeskin  KCordner  S Nail-gun suicide. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1990;11282- 284
PubMedArticle
2.
Rofail  MLee  LRLee  GATodd  B Suicide-related perforating injury of globe with nail gun. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2005;33294- 295
PubMedArticle
3.
Scarfo  GBMariottini  APalma  L Oculocerebral perforating trauma by foreign objects: diagnosis and surgery. J Neurosurg Sci 1990;34111- 116
PubMed
4.
Lee  BLSternberg  P  Jr Ocular nail gun injuries. Ophthalmology 1996;1031453- 1457
PubMedArticle
×