[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.50.247. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
Intraoperative image of Descemet stripping using a Price hook during posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty). The anterior chamber maintainer is seen at the 1-o’clock position.

Intraoperative image of Descemet stripping using a Price hook during posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty). The anterior chamber maintainer is seen at the 1-o’clock position.

Figure 2.
Light photomicrograph of a Descemet membrane specimen obtained using a Price hook during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy showing no presence of adherent rests of corneal stroma, numerous formations of guttae, and almost total endothelial cell loss in a low-power view (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100) and a high-power view (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×400) (inset).

Light photomicrograph of a Descemet membrane specimen obtained using a Price hook during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy showing no presence of adherent rests of corneal stroma, numerous formations of guttae, and almost total endothelial cell loss in a low-power view (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100) and a high-power view (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×400) (inset).

Table 1. Clinicohistopathologic Correlation of 20 Descemet Membrane Specimens After Descemet Stripping in DSAEKa
Table 1. Clinicohistopathologic Correlation of 20 Descemet Membrane Specimens After Descemet Stripping in DSAEKa
Table 2. Ultrastructural Findings in 20 Descemet Membrane Specimens After Descemet Stripping in DSAEKa
Table 2. Ultrastructural Findings in 20 Descemet Membrane Specimens After Descemet Stripping in DSAEKa
1.
Melles  GRJWijdh  RHJNieuwendaal  CP A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 2004;23 (3) 286- 288
PubMedArticle
2.
Van Dooren  BMulder  PGHNieuwendaal  CPBeekhuis  WHMelles  GRJ Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques): 3 years follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138 (2) 211- 217
PubMedArticle
3.
Price  FWPrice  MO Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg 2005;21 (4) 339- 345
PubMed
4.
Terry  MAOusley  PJ Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005;112 (9) 1541- 1549
PubMedArticle
5.
Price  FW  JrPrice  MO Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32 (3) 411- 418
PubMedArticle
6.
Terry  MAOusley  PJ Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: early complications and their management. Cornea 2006;25 (1) 37- 43
PubMedArticle
7.
Gorovoy  MS Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 886- 889
PubMedArticle
8.
Terry  MAHoar  KLWall  JOusley  P Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 926- 932
PubMedArticle
9.
Nieuwendaal  CPLapid-Gortzak  Rvan der Meulen  IJMelles  GJR Posterior lamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ-cultured donor corneal tissue (Melles technique). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 933- 936
PubMedArticle
10.
Lord  RKPrice  FWPrice  MOWerner  LMamalis  N Histology of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (9) 1093- 1096
PubMedArticle
11.
Price  MOPrice  FW Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006;113 (11) 1936- 1942
PubMedArticle
12.
Melles  GRJ Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 879- 881
PubMedArticle
13.
Melles  GRJOng  TSVervers  Bvan der Wees  J Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 987- 990
PubMedArticle
14.
Cursiefen  CKüchle  MNaumann  GO Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1,250 corneal buttons. Cornea 1998;17 (5) 468- 470
PubMedArticle
15.
Cursiefen  CChen  LSaint-Geniez  M  et al.  Nonvascular VEGF receptor 3 expression by corneal epithelium maintains avascularity and vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103 (30) 11405- 11410
PubMedArticle
16.
Cursiefen  CSchlötzer-Schrehardt  UKüchle  M  et al.  Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43 (7) 2127- 2135
PubMed
Clinical Sciences
April 1, 2008

Histologic Analysis of Descemet Stripping in Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(4):461-464. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.75
Abstract

Objective  To investigate how precise Descemet stripping works in posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty [DSAEK]) for the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders.

Methods  In a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized consecutive series, 20 Descemet membrane specimens obtained after Descemet stripping in DSAEK using a Price hook were examined using histologic analysis and transmission electron microscopy for the presence of residual stroma, thickness of the Descemet membrane, endothelial cell count, and presence of guttae or a posterior collagenous layer. Pathologic findings were correlated with the underlying clinical disease.

Results  Light and electron microscopy revealed no evidence of adherent rests of corneal stroma in all 20 specimens after Descemet stripping. The mean (SD) total thickness of the Descemet membrane was 21.5 (4.5) μm in peripheral localization and 17.6 (3.8) μm in central localization. The anterior banded layer measured a mean (SD) of 3.0 (0.8) μm thick; the posterior nonbanded layer, 16.7 (5.2) μm thick. The mean (SD) endothelial cell count was 1.7 (1.4) cells per high-power field. Guttae were seen in 15 specimens (75%), and a posterior collagenous layer was found in 3 (15%).

Conclusion  Descemet stripping in DSAEK using the Price hook achieves complete and specific removal of the Descemet membrane without adherent stroma in different underlying endothelial pathologic abnormalities.

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty is a new and exciting surgical alternative113 to standard full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty for the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders. Approximately 40% of all penetrating keratoplasties are performed for diseases of the corneal endothelium.14 Selective replacement of the dysfunctional posterior portion of the cornea offers distinct advantages compared with penetrating keratoplasty, including faster visual rehabilitation,313 improved surface topography with reduction of postsurgical astigmatism,313 reduced risk of expulsive hemorrhage in a “closed-system” procedure,313 protection of corneal innervation for the prevention of neurotrophic keratopathy,5,6,11 reduced immunologic rejection against the grafted endothelium6,11 due to the reduced amount of foreign surface antigens on the recipient cornea, and the presence of the recipient cornea's own anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic corneal epithelium.15

In Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), a donor posterior lamellar disc consisting of the posterior stroma, Descemet membrane, and endothelium is transplanted after dissecting the donor tissue using a microkeratome and stripping the recipient Descemet membrane with its endothelium using a Price hook (descemetorhexis or Descemet stripping).112 The purpose of this histologic and ultrastructural study was to investigate how precise Descemet stripping works in DSAEK using the Price hook and whether the precision of Descemet membrane removal depends on the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of the underlying corneal endothelial disease. This study not only may explain the superior results of this new lamellar transplantation technique but also is important for future endeavors in selective replacement of the Descemet membrane(eg, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty). 12,13

METHODS

Light and electron microscopic analyses were performed on 20 Descemet membrane specimens obtained after descemetorhexis in a consecutive series of the first 19 patients (20 eyes) who had undergone DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, and pseudoexfoliation syndrome keratopathy between July 1, 2006, and April 15, 2007, at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

According to Melles et al1,2,9 and Price and Price,3,5,11 donor tissue was prepared before surgery by placing a donor corneoscleral shell onto an artificial anterior chamber (ALTK System; Moria, Doylestown, Pennsylvania). An anterior lamellar cap was removed from the posterior portion using a microkeratome (CBm; Moria) with a 350-μm head. The remaining posterior portion of the donor cornea was transferred endothelial side up to a Hanna punch block (Moria) and trephined.

Using general anesthesia, the recipient corneal surface was marked with a 9-mm circular marker (Moria). An 8-mm nasal scleral tunnel incision was made in addition to 2 paracenteses. Via one paracentesis, an infusion trocar was inserted. A DSAEK Price hook (Moria) was used to score the Descemet membrane along the perimeter of the epithelial reference mark and to strip off the Descemet membrane with attached dysfunctional endothelium centripetally in the scored area (Figure 1). After full Descemet stripping, the Descemet membrane with endothelium was removed from the anterior chamber using a forceps and was sent for histopathologic evaluation. There was no use of trypan blue or air injection into the anterior chamber before Descemet membrane removal.

The donor posterior lamellar disc was placed endothelial side down on a viscoelastic (Acri.Hylon; Acri.Tec, Hennigsdorf, Germany) covered glideboard, gently grasped using a retinal forceps, and inserted through the 8-mm nasal scleral tunnel incision into the eye. Once the donor tissue was well centered, an air bubble was injected into the anterior chamber. After removal of the anterior chamber infusion trocar, both paracenteses and scleral tunnel incisions were sutured as a precaution. A preoperative YAG laser iridotomy was performed (or in the case of very edematous corneas, an intraoperative surgical iridectomy) to prevent Urrets-Zavalia syndrome.

HISTOPATHOLOGIC ANALYSIS

All Descemet membrane specimens were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections cut at 4 μm were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and periodic acid–Schiff and analyzed using a microscope (Axiophot; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) following digital documentation. Main outcome measures included the presence, localization, and thickness of residual stroma, the mean peripheral and central thickness of the Descemet membrane, the presence of guttae, the mean endothelial cell count, and the presence of a posterior collagenous layer. Mean thickness of the Descemet membrane and mean endothelial cell count were determined in 5 randomly selected high-power fields (HPFs) per slide (original magnification ×400).

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

For transmission electron microscopy, specimens from all 20 recipient eyes were postfixed in 2% buffered osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded alcohol concentrations, and embedded in epoxy resin according to standard protocols, as described previously.16 Semi thin (1-μm) sections for orientation were stained with toluidine blue. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate–lead citrate and were examined using a transmission electron microscope (EM 906E; Zeiss). Electron microscopy was used for detection and measurement of adherent rests of corneal stroma. In addition to the total thickness of the Descemet membrane specimen, the anterior banded layer, posterior nonbanded layer, and if present, posterior collagenous layer were measured for thickness in 5 randomly selected corneal segments per slide at a magnification of ×2000 .

RESULTS

The 20 Descemet membrane specimens in this prospective, nonrandomized series were derived from 19 consecutive patients (10 women and 9 men) with a mean (SD) age at surgery of 71 (8) years (range, 53-82 years). Bilateral DSAEK was performed in 1 patient within 4 months. Seven of the surgical eyes (35%) were right eyes. The clinical diagnoses included Fuchs endothelial dystrophy in 14 eyes (70%), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in 5 (25%), and pseudoexfoliation syndrome keratopathy in 1 (5%).

Light microscopy revealed no evidence of adherent rests of corneal stroma in all 20 specimens after Descemet stripping (Figure 2). The mean (SD) total thickness of the Descemet membrane was 21.5 (4.5) μm (range, 14.0-30.5 μm) in peripheral localization and 17.6 (3.8) μm (range, 11.0-25.0 μm) in central localization. Central guttae were found in 15 Descemet membranes (75%). The mean (SD) endothelial cell count was 1.7 (1.4) cells/HPF (range, 0-5.0 cells/HPF). A collagenous layer posterior to the Descemet membrane was seen in 3 specimens (15%) (Table 1).

By transmission electron microscopy, no stromal adherences were detected in all 20 Descemet stripping specimens (eFigure). Mean (SD) total specimen thickness was 20.3 (5.2) μm (range, 12.4-34.4 μm). The anterior banded layer measured a mean (SD) of 3.0 (0.8) μm thick (range, 2.2-5.6 μm thick); the posterior abnormally banded layer, 16.7 (5.2) μm thick (range, 5.7-29.2 μm thick). The mean (SD) posterior collagenous layer had a thickness of 6.1 (3.7) μm (range, 3.9-10.4 μm) (Table 2).

COMMENT

The present study analyzes, for the first time to our knowledge, the accuracy of manual Descemet stripping using a Price hook in DSAEK by means of light and electron microscopic techniques. In this prospective, nonrandomized consecutive series, complete and specific removal of the Descemet membrane with its endothelial cell layer without adherent stroma was achieved in 100% of the 20 recipient eyes.

These findings coincide with the results of the first description of the descemetorhexis technique for preparation of a recipient stromal bed in posterior lamellar keratoplasty by Melles et al1 in 2004. After visualization of the Descemet membrane using a reflective glide placed on the iris, the Descemet membrane was carefully stripped off the posterior stroma by loosening the membrane at the 6-o’clock position and pulling it toward the incision at the 12-o’clock position using a custom-made scraper.1 Microscopic examination showed isolated Descemet membranes without stromal tissue elements in all 3 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.1

Because we used a different surgical technique (without air instillation in the anterior chamber and no use of trypan blue), a different surgical manipulation of the Descemet membrane (Price hook), and a larger series of patients with different underlying diseases (Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, and pseudoexfoliation syndrome keratopathy), this study supports the concept that in routine DSAEK, the Descemet membrane is removed specifically without adherent stromal tissues. This has 2 important clinical implications. First, it supports the concept that the superior visual results achieved in patients having undergone DSAEK compared with other lamellar keratoplasty techniques is due to reduced interface problems. In posterior lamellar keratoplasty, complete removal of the Descemet membrane without stromal damage may minimize the risk of interface haze.1 Second, our observation that in a larger series of patients with different endothelial pathologic abnormalities, specific and isolated removal of the Descemet membrane is possible also supports the concept that it is possible to solely transplant the Descemet membrane in patients with endothelial pathologic abnormalities. Melles et al13 recently showed the general feasibility of that concept (ie, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty).

In conclusion, Descemet stripping using a Price hook in routine DSAEK is a precise, controlled technique to achieve complete and specific removal of the Descemet membrane without adherent stroma.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Ludwig M. Heindl, MD, Department of Ophthalmology and University Eye Hospital, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany (ludwig.heindl@uk-erlangen.de).

Submitted for Publication: July 3, 2007; final revision received August 27, 2007; accepted August 29, 2007.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

References
1.
Melles  GRJWijdh  RHJNieuwendaal  CP A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 2004;23 (3) 286- 288
PubMedArticle
2.
Van Dooren  BMulder  PGHNieuwendaal  CPBeekhuis  WHMelles  GRJ Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques): 3 years follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138 (2) 211- 217
PubMedArticle
3.
Price  FWPrice  MO Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg 2005;21 (4) 339- 345
PubMed
4.
Terry  MAOusley  PJ Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005;112 (9) 1541- 1549
PubMedArticle
5.
Price  FW  JrPrice  MO Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32 (3) 411- 418
PubMedArticle
6.
Terry  MAOusley  PJ Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: early complications and their management. Cornea 2006;25 (1) 37- 43
PubMedArticle
7.
Gorovoy  MS Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 886- 889
PubMedArticle
8.
Terry  MAHoar  KLWall  JOusley  P Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 926- 932
PubMedArticle
9.
Nieuwendaal  CPLapid-Gortzak  Rvan der Meulen  IJMelles  GJR Posterior lamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ-cultured donor corneal tissue (Melles technique). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 933- 936
PubMedArticle
10.
Lord  RKPrice  FWPrice  MOWerner  LMamalis  N Histology of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (9) 1093- 1096
PubMedArticle
11.
Price  MOPrice  FW Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006;113 (11) 1936- 1942
PubMedArticle
12.
Melles  GRJ Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 879- 881
PubMedArticle
13.
Melles  GRJOng  TSVervers  Bvan der Wees  J Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 987- 990
PubMedArticle
14.
Cursiefen  CKüchle  MNaumann  GO Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1,250 corneal buttons. Cornea 1998;17 (5) 468- 470
PubMedArticle
15.
Cursiefen  CChen  LSaint-Geniez  M  et al.  Nonvascular VEGF receptor 3 expression by corneal epithelium maintains avascularity and vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103 (30) 11405- 11410
PubMedArticle
16.
Cursiefen  CSchlötzer-Schrehardt  UKüchle  M  et al.  Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43 (7) 2127- 2135
PubMed
×