[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.145.218.90. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1972

FURTHER COMMENTS ON MALIGNANT MELANOMA-Reply

Author Affiliations

Philadelphia

Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;88(6):696-697. doi:10.1001/archopht.1972.01000030698028

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.  —With respect to the letter by Dr. Ruiz concerning our article, we do not entirely agree with the first point he made, that no one can look at a fundus lesion and say with certainty that it is or is not malignant. Most malignant melanomas, when first seen by the ophthalmologist, have a rather typical appearance to indirect ophthalmoscopy and should offer little diagnostic problem. In such cases, we think that the diagnosis can be made with virtual certainty on the basis of indirect ophthalmoscopy alone. We agree, however, that in the case of small, relatively flat lesions, the diagnosis may be difficult to impossible. The Retina Service at Wills Eye Hospital has performed about 100 32P studies during the last 18 months and we share the enthusiasm for 32P testing in such cases. However, we do not consider it to be the final answer

×