[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.41.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1977

Visually Evoked Response Testing With a Stimulator-OphthalmoscopeMacular Scars, Hereditary Macular Degenerations, and Retinitis Pigmentosa

Author Affiliations

From the Berman-Gund Laboratory for the Study of Retinal Degenerations, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(10):1805-1808. doi:10.1001/archopht.1977.04450100107013
Abstract

• Visually evoked responses (VERs) were recorded from 47 patients under age 60 years with macular scars, hereditary macular degenerations, or retinitis pigmentosa. A hand-held, two-channel stimulator-ophthalmoscope was used to present to the central fovea a 1.5° flickering stimulus centrally superimposed on a steady 10° background. All 31 patients with visual acuity (VA) 20/50 or less had abnormal VERs; among patients with VA 20/25 to 20/40, all six with macular degenerations and five of ten with retinitis pigmentosa also showed abnormal VERs. Abnormal VERs were either out of phase or indistinguishable from noise. Sensitivity of the technique depended on a low ratio of stimulus to background retinal illuminance and the fact that the stimulus could be visualized by the examiner through the ophthalmoscope and maintained on the central fovea throughout testing.

(Arch Ophthalmol 95:1805-1808, 1977)

References
1.
Rietveld WJ, Tordoir WEM, Duyff JW:  Contribution of fovea and parafovea to the visual evoked response . Acta Physiol Pharmacol 13:330-339, 1965.
2.
Armington JC:  The electroretinogram: The visual evoked potential and the area-luminance relation . Vis Res 8:263-276, 1968.
3.
Fishman RS, Copenhaver RM:  Macular disease and amblyopia: The visual-evoked response . Arch Ophthalmol 77:718-725, 1967.
4.
Inoue J, Takeo K, Akiba T:  The visual evoked potentials to focal illumination of the retina by direct view ophthalmoscopy . Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jap 77:1149-1160, 1973.
5.
Copenhaver R, Beinhocker G:  Evoked occipital potentials recorded from scalp electrodes in response to focal visual illumination . Invest Ophthalmol 2:393-406, 1963.
6.
Copenhaver R, Perry N:  Factors affecting visually evoked cortical potentials such as impaired vision of varying etiology . Invest Ophthalmol 3:665-675, 1964.
7.
Potts A, Nagaya T:  Studies of the visual evoked response: I. The use of the 0.06 degree red target for evaluation of foveal function . Invest Ophthalmol 4:303-309, 1965.
8.
Schreinemachers HP, Henkes HE:  Relation between localized retinal stimuli and the visual evoked response in man . Ophthalmologica 155:17-27, 1968.
9.
Jacobson J, Kawasaki K, Hirose T:  Human electroretinogram and occipital potential in response to focal illumination of the retina . Invest Ophthalmol 8:545-556, 1969.
10.
Fricker SJ:  Analysis of the visually evoked response by synchronous detector techniques: I. Patients with cataracts . Invest Ophthalmol 10:340-347, 1971.
×