[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1983

Intracorneal Lens Implantation

Author Affiliations

From the Cornea Service of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (Drs Sendele, Abelson, and Kenyon); the Morphology Unit (Drs Sendele and Kenyon and Ms Hanninen), and the Ocular Allergy Laboratory (Dr Abelson), Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation; and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (Drs Sendele, Kenyon, and Abelson), Boston. Presented at the semiannual symposium of the Keratorefractive Society, New Orleans, May 23, 1981.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(6):940-944. doi:10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010940018
Abstract

• In previous experiments, we found that a high-water-content hydroxyethyl methacrylate (Permalens) hydrogel implant was not only well tolerated within the rabbit corneal stroma but also would successfully alter the anterior radius of curvature, and thus the refractive state, of the rabbit eye. The same lens material implanted in the cornea of a patient with aphakic bullous keratopathy was tolerated for six months and decreased epithelial edema but did not alter the refractive state. This cornea, containing the intrastromal lens, was obtained at subsequent penetrating keratoplasty and studied by light and transmission electron microscopy. Morphologically, the epithelium and anterior stroma were not edematous, whereas the stroma posterior to the lens remained edematous. Minimal fibroblastic activity was evident at the lens-stroma interface. There were no signs of inflammation, ulceration, or neovascularization.

References
1.
Barraquer JI:  Quertoplastia refractiva . Estudios Informaciones Oftalmol 1949;2:1-21.
2.
Barraquer JI:  Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions . Int Ophthalmol Clin 1966;6:53-78.Article
3.
Belau PG, Dyer JA, Ogle KN, et al:  Correction of ametropia with intracorneal lenses . Arch Ophthalmol 1964;72:541-547.Article
4.
Choyce DP:  The present status of intra-cameral and intra-corneal implants . Can J Ophthalmol 1968;3:295-311.
5.
Krwawicz T:  Attempted modification of corneal curvature by means by experimental plastic surgery . Klin Oczna 1960;30:229-246.
6.
Knowles WF:  Effect of intralamellar plastic membranes on corneal physiology . Am J Ophthalmol 1961;51:1146-1156.
7.
Pollack IP:  Water movement in rabbit corneas containing a plastic interlamellar disc . Am J Ophthalmol 1965;60:481-487.
8.
Turss R, Friend J, Dohlman CH:  Effect of a corneal fluid barrier on the nutrition of the epithelium . Exp Eye Res 1970;9:254-259.Article
9.
Dohlman CH, Refojo MF, Rose J:  Synthetic polymers in corneal surgery: I. Glyceryl methacrylate . Arch Ophthalmol 1967;77:252-257.Article
10.
Brown SI, Mishima S:  The effect of intralamellar water-impermeable membranes on corneal hydration . Arch Ophthalmol 1966;76:702-708.Article
11.
Mester U, Roth K, Dardenne MU:  Versuche mit 2-Hydroxyaethylmethacrylat: Linsen als Keratophakiematerial . Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 1972;72:326-327.
12.
Mester U, Heimig D, Dardenne MU:  Measurement and calculation of refraction in experimental keratophakia with hydrophilic lenses . Ophthalmic Res 1976;8:111-116.Article
13.
Gillette TE, Udell IJ, Abelson MB:  Hydrogel keratophakia , in Schachar RA, Levy NS, Schachar L (eds): Keratorefraction: Proceedings of the Keratorefractive Society Meeting . Denison, Tex, LAL Publishing, 1980, pp 127-134.
14.
McCarey BE, Andrews DM:  Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;21:107-115.
15.
Barraquer JI:  Basis of refractive keratoplasty . Arch Soc Am Oftalmol Optom 1967;6:21-68.
16.
Maurice DM:  Nutritional aspects of corneal grafts and prostheses , in Rycroft PV (ed): Corneo-Plastic Surgery: Proceedings of the Second International Corneo-Plastic Conference, London, 1967 . New York, Pergamon Press, 1969, pp 197-207.
×