[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.169.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1985

Improved Color Test Results With Large-Field Viewing in Dichromats

Author Affiliations

From the Physics Division, National Research Council of Canada (Dr Breton), and the Psychology Department, Carleton University (Dr Tansley), Ottawa. Dr Breton is now with the Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(10):1490-1495. doi:10.1001/archopht.1985.01050100066021
Abstract

• Standard methods for screening color vision defects may be expected to underestimate a color defective's complete chromatic discrimination abilities because the viewing field is confined to the fovea (central 2°). Large-field (8°) Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue and dichotomous (D-15) tests were constructed. The 100-hue test, along with its small-field counterpart, was administered to five deuteranopes (green defectives) and four protanopes (red defectives). The D-15 small- and large-field tests were given to these same subjects with the addition of two deuteranopes and one protanope. Both deuteranopes and protanopes showed marked improvement on the large-field D-15 and 100-hue tests. This improvement in performance for largefield over small-field viewing is consistent with color-matching data, which show large-field trichromacy in observers who have been demonstrated to be small-field red-green dichromats. These results suggest that tests confined to central fovea viewing provide an incomplete functional description of the color vision of an appreciable number of classic dichromats.

References
1.
Jaeger WV, Kroker K:  Über das Verhalten der Protanopen und Deuteranopen bei grossen Reizflächen . Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1952; 121:445-449.
2.
Waardenburg PJ, Franceschetti A, Klein D: Genetics and Ophthalmology . Assen, the Netherlands, Royal Van Gorcum, 1961.
3.
Smith VC, Pokorny J:  Large-field trichromacy in protanopes and deuteranopes . J Opt Soc Am 1977;67:213-220.Article
4.
Nagy AL:  Large-field substitution Rayleigh matches of dichromats . J Opt Soc Am 1980; 70:778-784.Article
5.
Breton ME, Cowan WB:  Deuteranomalous color matching in the deuteranopic eye . J Opt Soc Am 1981;71:1220-1223.Article
6.
Piantanida TP, Frome F, Kelly DH:  Spectral sensitivity of the forbidden cones in dichromats , abstracted. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17( (suppl) ):197-198.
7.
Frome F, Piantanida TP, Kelly DH:  Flicker thresholds reveal forbidden cones in dichromats , abstracted. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17( (suppl) ):197.
8.
Pinckers A:  Combined panel D-15 and 100hue recording . Ophthalmologica 1971;163:232-234.Article
9.
Higgins KE, Knoblauch K:  Validity of Pinckers' 100-hue version of the panel D-15 . Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:165-170.Article
10.
Farnsworth D: The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test . Baltimore, Munsell Color Co, 1957.
11.
Smith VC, Ernest T, Pokorny J:  Effect of hypoxia on FM 100-hue test performance . Mod Probl Ophthalmol 1976;17:248-256.
12.
Kinnear PR:  Proposals for scoring and assessing the 100-hue test . Vision Res 1970;10:423-433.Article
13.
Pokorny J, Smith VC, Verriest G, et al: Congenital and Acquired Color Vision Defects . New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1979.
×