[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.241.171. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1986

Recording Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials Under Chloral Hydrate Sedation

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles; and the Division of Ophthalmology, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(5):718-721. doi:10.1001/archopht.1986.01050170108032
Abstract

• Accurate assessment of visual function in infants and preverbal children is difficult because of the dependence on vision tests that require the patient's cooperation. In an attempt to resolve this problem, we evaluated pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) obtained on infants under chloral hydrate sedation. Ten patients were studied—four with unilateral amblyopia, three with suspected amblyopia, and three without amblyopia. Patients with amblyopia showed robust and reproducible responses from the sound eye, while responses from the amblyopic eye were significantly diminished (amplitude ratio ≤ 0.63). The PVEP responses from patients without amblyopia were large in amplitude and symmetrical between fellow eyes (amplitude ratio > 0.9). In two eyes with normal vision, optically fogging the patterned stimulus image substantially reduced the PVEP response, establishing a sensitivity to pattern images rather than changes in the overall luminance. We have thus determined that the PVEP can be reliably obtained under chloral hydrate sedation and that these responses, like PVEP responses taken in the awake state, reflect the presence of amblyopia and image clarity. Use of the PVEP with chloral hydrate sedation may prove clinically useful for detecting amblyopia in uncooperative infants and children.

References
1.
Hoyt CS, Nickel BL, Billson FA:  Ophthalmological examination of the infant: Developmental aspects . Surv Ophthalmol 1982;26:177-189.Article
2.
Hoyt CS:  The clinical usefulness of the visual evoked response . J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1984;21:231-234.
3.
Nelson LB, Rubin SE, Wagner RS, et al:  Developmental aspects in the assessment of visual function in young children . Pediatrics 1984;73:375-381.
4.
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Manning KA:  Measuring visual acuity in infants . Surv Ophthalmol 1981;25:325-332.Article
5.
Dobson V, Teller DY:  Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies . Vision Res 1978;18:1469-1483.Article
6.
Sokol S:  Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentials . Vision Res 1978;18:33-39.Article
7.
Marg E, Freeman DN, Peltzman P, et al:  Visual acuity development in human infants: Evoked potential measurements . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1976;15:150-153.
8.
Sokol S, Dobson V:  Pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in infants . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1976;15:58-62.
9.
Zipf RF:  Binocular fixation pattern . Arch Ophthalmol 1976;94:401-405.Article
10.
Wright KW, Walonker F, Edelman P:  10-Diopter fixation test for amblyopia . Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:1242-1246.Article
11.
Judisch GF, Anderson S, Bell WE:  Chloral hydrate sedation as a substitute for examination under anesthesia in pediatric ophthalmology . Am J Ophthalmol 1980;89:560-563.
12.
Van der Marel H, van Beem H, Spekreijse H:  Nitrous oxide influences pattern EP estimate of visual acuity . Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1982;218:250-252.Article
13.
Bagolini B, Penne A, Fonda S:  Pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in general anesthesia . Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1979;209:231-238.Article
14.
Sokol S:  Visually evoked potentials: Theory, techniques and clinical applications . Surv Ophthalmol 1976;21:18-44.Article
15.
Sokol S, Jones K:  Implicit time of pattern evoked potentials in infants: An index of maturation of spatial vision . Vision Res 1979;19:747-755.Article
16.
Wanger P, Nilsson BY:  Visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal stimulation in patients with amblyopia and/or defective binocular functions . Acta Ophthalmol 1978;56:617-627.Article
17.
Levi DM:  Do visual evoked potentials studies reveal amblyopic abnormalities not readily apparent in psychophysical tests? Ann NY Acad Sci 1982;388:615-621.Article
18.
Lawwill T:  Electrophysiologic aspects of amblyopia . Ophthalmology 1978;85:451-464.Article
19.
Darcey TM, Ary JP, Fender DH:  Methods for the localization of electrical sources in the human brain . Prog Brain Res 1980;54:128-134.
20.
Darcey TM: Methods for Localization of Electrical Sources in Human Brain and Application to the Visual System, thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1979.
21.
Wiesel TN, Hubel DH:  Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye . J Neurophysiol 1963;26:1003-1017.
22.
Wiesel TN, Hubel DH:  Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate body . J Neurophysiol 1963;26:978-993.
23.
Ikeda H, Tremain KE:  Amblyopia resulting from penalization: Neurophysiological studies of kittens reared with atropinization of one or both eyes . Br J Ophthalmol 1978;62:21-28.Article
24.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN:  Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens . J Neurophysiol 1963; 266:994-1002.
25.
Von Noorden GK:  Histological studies of the visual system in monkeys with experimental amblyopia . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1973; 12:727-738.
26.
Von Noorden GK, Crawford MLJ:  The effects of total unilateral occlusion vs lid suture in the visual system of infant monkeys . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;211:142-146.
27.
Von Noorden GK, Crawford MLJ, Levacy RA:  The lateral geniculate nucleus in human anisometropic amblyopia . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;246:788-790.
×