[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.169.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1986

Transplant of Oral Mucosal Epithelium to Rabbit Ocular Surface Wounds In Vivo

Author Affiliations

From the Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation (Dr Gipson and Ms Spurr-Michaud) and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (Dr Gipson), Boston; and The Mason Clinic, Seattle (Dr Geggel).

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(10):1529-1533. doi:10.1001/archopht.1986.01050220123039
Abstract

• Sheets of epithelium freed of underlying connective tissue and basal lamina with dispase II were obtained from explants of rabbit oral mucosa. Epithelial sheets were then sutured onto abraded (basement membrane intact) or keratectomized corneal-limbal zones or abraded central corneas of anesthetized rabbits. To develop the procedure, allografts to abraded (N=13) and keratectomized wounds (N=3) on the corneal-limbal zone were done. All allografts were retained on the wound bed until the experiment was terminated or rejection occurred. Prior to rejection, eyes were uninflamed and quiet. Allografts on central avascular corneal wounds (N=8) were not maintained. Autografts (N=4) sutured to corneal-limbal abrasion wounds were maintained until animals were killed at the end of the experiment, 22, 26, 60, and 120 days after transplant. Eyes were uninflamed and quiet. A fine vascular bed developed under both allografts and autografts in the peripheral cornea. Grafts maintained some histologic characteristics of oral mucosal epithelium, even after four months. These data indicate that it is feasible to transplant oral mucosal epithelium to corneal-limbal ocular surface wounds and that the grafts will be maintained. Such transplants are, however, not maintained over central, avascular corneal regions.

References
1.
Friend J, Kinoshita S, Thoft RA, et al:  Corneal epithelial cell cultures on stromal carriers . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982;23:41-49.
2.
Thoft RA:  Conjunctival transplantation . Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:1425-1428.Article
3.
Thoft RA:  Keratoepithelioplasty . Am J Ophthalmol 1984;97:1-6.
4.
Denig R:  A surgical treatment for alkali burns of the eye . München Med Wochenschr 1912; 1:579-590.
5.
Ballen PH:  Mucous membrane grafts in chemical (lye) burns . Am J Ophthalmol 1963; 55:302-312.
6.
Gipson IK, Grill SM:  A technique for obtaining sheets of intact rabbit corneal epithelium . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982;23:269-273.
7.
Geggel HS, Gipson IK:  Removal of viable sheets of conjunctival epithelium with dispase II . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:15-22.
8.
Gipson IK, Grill SM, Spurr SJ, et al:  Hemidesmosome formation in vitro . J Cell Biol 1983; 97:849-857.Article
9.
Gipson IK, Friend J, Spurr SJ:  Transplant of corneal epithelium to rabbit corneal wounds in vivo . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:425-433.
10.
Richardson KC, Jarrett L, Finke EH:  Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy . Stain Technol 1960;35:313-323.
11.
Wolf JE, Harrison RG:  Demonstration of an epidermal angiogenic factor . J Invest Dermatol 1973;61:130-141.Article
12.
Nishloka K, Ryan TJ:  Influence of the epidermis and other tissues on blood vessel growth in the hamster cheek pouch . J Invest Dermatol 1972;58:33-45.Article
×