[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.155.6. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1988

To Admit or Not to Admit, That Is the Question-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(11):1501. doi:10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140669004

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —Drs Fleischman and Lerner report on their positive experience with outpatient vitreoretinal surgery. They criticize the design of our study and question our conclusions about the need for hospitalization in most patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery.Despite Fleischman and Lerner's assertion in their opening sentence, we did not attempt "to establish prospectively the necessity for inpatient hospital care." Rather, we prospectively studied 200 cases to "determine the postoperative hospitalization requirements."1 Fleischman and Lerner report their own experience with outpatient surgery based on a review of some patient records without giving any details as to the number of cases involved, the method of analysis, or the criteria for hospital admission. They are satisfied with their approach because they have not received any significant complaints. They report that a retrospective telephone survey of 20 consecutive outpatient surgical cases was performed and that the patients did not report major complaints or pain.

References
1.
Iserhagen RD, Michels RG, Glaser BM, et al:  Hospitalization requirements after vitreoretinal surgery . Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:767-770.Article
×