[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1989

Age-Related Cataract in the Tibet Eye Study

Author Affiliations

From Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs Hu and Zhao); People's Hospital of Tibet, Lhasa, China (Dr Zhen); the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Drs Sperduto and Milton); and Juntendo University Medical School, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Blindness, Tokyo (Dr Nakajima). A complete list of participants in the Tibet Eye Study appears at the end of this article.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(5):666-669. doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010684027
Abstract

• The Tibet Eye Study was designed to estimate the prevalence of age-related cataract in Duilong-Deqing County, west of Lhasa, China (altitude, 4000 m). Previous reports have suggested an unusually high prevalence of age-related cataract in Tibet. A two-stage probability sample of persons aged 20 years or older from the 35 townships of the county targeted 2884 persons for inclusion in the study; 2665 (92.4%) were examined. Age-related cataract was diagnosed when (1) visual acuity was worse than 6/12 (20/40) because of nuclear or cortical (including posterior subcapsular) opacities, or (2) aphakia associated with a history of age-related cataract was present in either eye. The prevalence of age-related cataract among persons aged 20 to 39 years was 0.2%; among persons 40 years old or older, the prevalence was 11.8%. Cortical cataracts were by far the most common type of cataract diagnosed. Age- and sexadjusted prevalence in Tibet was 60% higher than the prevalence in a similar, previously conducted study of 6951 person in Shunyi County, northeast of Beijing (altitude, 50 m). A second, independent slit-lamp classification of lens status was conducted in the Tibet Eye Study using standard photographs previously described. Age-specific cataract prevalence was similar with the two examination techniques. Results from the Tibet Eye Study support previous suggestions of a high prevalence of age-related cataract in Tibet.

References
1.
Liu JQ:  Achievements in research and treatment of senile cataract in China since liberation . Chin J Ophthalmol 1959:9:347-349.
2.
Song WX, Zhang MD:  Prevalence study of senile cataract among 1486 Tibetan farmers and herdsmen in Changdu District, Tibet . Chin J Ophthalmol 1979;15:100-104.
3.
Fu HT:  Senile cataract in Tibet , in Ye RL (ed): Practical Altitudinal Medicine . Lhasa, China, People's Press of Tibet, 1984, pp 312-313.
4.
Mao WS, Hu TS:  An epidemiologic survey of senile cataract in China . Chin Med J 1982;95:813-818.
5.
Hu Z, Zhao JL: An epidemiologic survey of eye disease in Shunyi County, Beijing. Chin J Ophthalmol, in press.
6.
Ferris FL, Kassoff A:  New visual acuity charts for clinical research . Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:91-96.
7.
Leibowitz HM, Kreuger DE, Maunder LR, et al:  The Framingham Eye Study Monograph . Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24( (suppl) ):350-365.Article
8.
Chylack LT, Leske MC, Sperduto RD:  Lens opacities classification system . Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:330-334.Article
9.
Gates DM:  Spectral distribution of solar radiation at the earth's surface . Science 1966;151:523-529.Article
10.
Vines AP: An Epidemiological Sample Survey of the Highlands, Mainland and Island Regions of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea . Port Moresby, New Guinea, Dept of Public Health 1967, pp 422-447.
11.
Chatterjee A:  Cataract in Punjab , in Symposium on the Human Lens in Relation to Cataract: Ciba Foundation Symposium 19 . Amsterdam, Associated Scientific Publishers, 1973, pp 265-279.
12.
Brilliant LB, Grasset NC, Pokhrel RP, et al:  Associations among cataract prevalence, sunlight hours, and altitude in the Himalayas . Am J Epidemiol 1983;118:250-264.
13.
Hiller R, Sperduto RD, Ederer F:  Epidemiologic associations with nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular cataracts . Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:916-925.
14.
Taylor HR, West SK, Rosenthal FS, et al:  Effect of ultraviolet radiation on cataract formation . N Engl J Med 1988;319:1429-1433.Article
×