[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.41.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1989

Computers and the Legal Standard of Care

Author Affiliations

Director, Division of Library and Information Management American Medical Association

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(7):966. doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020028017

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

References
1.
The T. J. Hooper, 60 F2d 737 (2d Cir 1932).
2.
Harbeson v Parke Davis, 746 F2d 517 (9th Cir 1984).
3.
Darling v Chareleston Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill2d 326, 211 NE2d 253 (1965), cert denied 383 US946 (1966), Helling v Carey 83 Wash2d 514,519 P2d 981 (1974).
4.
Foreman J.  Computers in clinical medicine raise questions of liability . Arch Ophthalmol . 1989;107:25.Article
5.
Brannigan VM, Dayhoff RE.  Liability for personal injuries caused by defective medical computer programs . Am J Law Med . 1981;7:123-124.
6.
Young FE.  Validation of medical software: present policy of the Food and Drug Administration . Ann Intern Med . 1987;106:628-629.Article
7.
Willick MS.  Professional malpractice and the unauthorized practice of professions: some legal and ethical aspects of the use of computers as decision aids . Rutgers Computer Tech Law J . 1986;12:1,8.
×