[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1990

Refractive Predictability of Myopic Hydrogel Intracorneal Lenses in Nonhuman Primate Eyes

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (Dr McCarey), Allergan Medical Optics, Irvine, Calif (Mr Storie and Dr Knight), and the Department of Ophthalmology, Groningen (the Netherlands) University (Dr van Rij).

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(9):1310-1315. doi:10.1001/archopht.1990.01070110126036
Abstract

• The refractive predictability of myopic hydrogel intracorneal lenses made of lidofilcon A was evaluated in 24 monkey eyes following a microkeratome dissection. All eyes were examined monthly for refractive alteration and clinical appearance during a follow-up period of 7 to 33 months. The refractive yield was measured by retinoscopy and found to be a function of the implant depth. The mean±SD percent of the desired correction achieved averaged 70%±24% at a 36% to 60% depth (n = 8), 54%±22% at a 61% to 79% depth (n = 7), and 12%±14% in implants deeper than at a 79% depth (n = 9). For eyes with implants at a 36% to 60% depth, the predicted vs achieved refractive alteration yielded a correlation coefficient of.97 (88% within ± 3 diopters of the correlation). The refractive outcome remained stable throughout 7 months of follow-up, whereas deeply placed lenses (≥80%) exhibited significant regression in power during this time.

References
1.
Barraquer JI.  Queratoplastia refractiva: estudios e informaciones . Ophthalmologica . 1949;2:10.
2.
McCarey BE, Andrews DM.  Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1981;21:107-115.
3.
Binder PS, Deg JK, Zavala EY, Grossman KR.  Hydrogel keratophakia in non-human primates . Curr Eye Res . 1981/1982;1:535-542.Article
4.
Koenig SB, Hamano T, Yamaguchi T, Kimura T, McDonald MB, Kaufman HE.  Refractive keratoplasty with hydrogel implants in primates . Ophthalmic Surg . 1984;15:225-229.
5.
Werblin TP, Peiffer RL, Fryczkowski AW.  Myopic hydrogel keratophakia: preliminary report . Cornea . 1984/1985;3:197-204.
6.
Beekhuis WH, McCarey BE, Waring GO, van Rij G.  Hydrogel keratophakia: a microkeratome dissection in the monkey model . Br J Ophthalmol . 1986;70:192-198.Article
7.
McCarey BE, McDonald MB, van Rij G, Salmerman B, Pettit DK, Knight PM.  Refractive results of hyperopic hydrogel intracorneal lenses in primate eyes . Arch Ophthalmol . 1989;107:724-730.Article
8.
Werblin TP, Patel AS.  Myopic hydrogel keratophakia: improvements in lens design . Cornea . 1987;6:197-201.Article
9.
Sendele DD, Abelson MB, Kenyon KR, Hanninen LA.  Intracorneal lens implantation . Arch Ophthalmol . 1983;101:940-944.Article
10.
Watsky MA, McCarey BE, Beekhuis WH.  Predicting refractive alterations with hydrogel keratophakia . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1985;26:240-243.
11.
Barraquer JI.  Keratomileusis for the correction of aphakia . Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol . 1980:450-479.
12.
Binder PS, Zavala EY, Deg JK.  Hydrogel refractive keratoplasty: lens removal and exchanges . Cornea . 1983;2:119-125.
13.
Maguire LJ, Singer DE, Klyce SD.  Graphic presentation of computer-analyzed keratoscope photographs . Arch Ophthalmol . 1987;105:223-230.Article
14.
Maguire LJ, Klyce SD, Singer DE, McDonald MB, Kaufman HE.  Corneal topography in myopic patients undergoing epikeratophakia . Am J Ophthalmol . 1987;103:404-416.
15.
Beekhuis WH, McCarey BE, van Rij G, Waring GO III.  Complications of hydrogel intracorneal lenses in monkeys . Arch Ophthalmol . 1987;105:116-122.Article
16.
Barraquer JI, Viteri E.  Results of myopic keratomileusis . J Refract Surg . 1987;3:98-101.
×