[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1991

Endophthalmitis Therapy: Changing Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns and Current Therapeutic Recommendations-Reply

Author Affiliations

Baltimore, Md
Atlanta, Ga

Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(2):176. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080020021013

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —We appreciate the comments on our work by Dr Flynn and colleagues and agree that the current trend is toward the use of vancomycin and aminoglycoside for intravitreal injection rather than cefazolin and an aminoglycoside. This change in choice of drugs occurred because vancomycin has superior activity against streptococci and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.We used cefazolin in our studies as a model to investigate pharmacokinetic changes of a first-generation cephalosporin after inflammation and surgery. We have demonstrated that inflammation increases the half-life of the drug after intravitreal injection, while vitrectomy decreases it.1 Enhanced drug penetration over time into inflamed eyes after multiple intravenous doses had not been previously defined, and our findings point to the possible importance of this phenomenon for other drugs available for treatment of endophthalmitis.2 Taking these studies together, we now know that we can achieve therapeutic levels of cefazolin in the vitreous cavity

References
1.
Ficker LA, Meredith TA, Gardner S, Wilson LA.  Cefazolin levels after intravitreal injection . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1990;31:502-505.
2.
Martin DA, Ficker LA, Aguilar HE, Gardner SK, Wilson LA, Meredith TA.  Vitreous cefazolin levels after intravenous injection . Arch Ophthalmol . 1990;108:411-414.Article
×