[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.41.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1991

Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Among White and Black AmericansThe Baltimore Eye Survey

Author Affiliations

From the Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Institute and School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(8):1090-1095. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080050026
Abstract

• A detailed ocular examination, including perimetry, was conducted on 5308 black and white subjects aged 40 years and older in a population-based prevalence survey in east Baltimore, Md. Repeated, detailed examinations were carried out on selected subjects. Roughly half of all subjects with optic nerve damage from primary open angle glaucoma, regardless of race, were unaware that they had the condition. The average intraocular pressure (IOP) among black patients with glaucoma who were receiving treatment was virtually identical to that in those black patients who were not receiving treatment (median IOP, 20 mm Hg); treated eyes of white patients had a lower IOP than those eyes of white patients who were not receiving treatment (mean[±SD] IOP, 18.69 ±3.23 mm Hg vs 24.15±5.23 mm Hg; P<.001). The risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage increased with the height of the screening IOP, particularly at levels of 22 to 29 and 30 mm Hg and above (relative rate compared with IOP of 15 mm Hg or lower, 12.8 and 40.1 mm Hg, respectively). More than half of all glaucomatous eyes had a screening IOP below 21 mm Hg, whether these eyes were receiving treatment or not. The IOP in glaucomatous eyes tended to rise on follow-up, in contrast with nonglaucomatous eyes in which the IOP was as likely to rise as to fall. Results confirmed that IOP is an important factor in glaucoma, but did not support the traditional distinction between "normal" and "elevated" pressure, nor its corollaries, "low-tension" glaucoma and "high-tension" glaucoma.

References
1.
Bengtsson B.  Aspects of the epidemiology of chronic glaucoma . Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) . 1981;146:1-48.
2.
Eddy DM, Sanders LE, Eddy JF.  The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry . Surv Ophthalmol . 1983;28:194-205.Article
3.
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, Katz J, Royall RM.  Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population: the Baltimore Eye Survey . Arch Ophthalmol . 1990;108:286-290.Article
4.
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al.. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. In press.
5.
Kosoko O, Sommer A, Auer C.  Screening with automated perimetry utilizing a threshold-related three-level algorithm . Ophthalmology . 1986;93:882-886.Article
6.
Sommer A, Quigley HA, Robin AL, Miller NR, Katz J, Arkell S.  Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment . Arch Ophthalmol . 1984;102:1766-1771.Article
7.
Katz J, Tielsch JM, Singh K, Sommer A.  Racial variations in optic disc characteristics: the Baltimore Eye Survey . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1990;32( (suppl) ):431.
8.
Cartwright MJ, Anderson DR.  Correlation of asymmetric damage with asymmetric intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma (low tension glaucoma) . Arch Ophthalmol . 1988;106:898-900.Article
9.
Chrichton A, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M.  Unequal intraocular pressure and its relation to asymmetric visual field defects in low-tension glaucoma . Ophthalmology . 1989;96:1312-1314.Article
10.
Anderson DR.  Glaucoma: the damage caused by pressure: XLVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture . Am J Ophthalmol . 1989;108:485-495.
11.
Hollows FC, Graham PA.  Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population . Br J Ophthalmol . 1966;50:570-586.Article
12.
Kahn HA, Milton RC.  Alternative definitions of open-angle glaucoma: effect on prevalence and associations in the Framingham Eye Study , Arch Ophthalmol . 1980;98:2172-2177.Article
13.
Mason RP, Kosoko O, Wilson R, et al.  National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St Lucia, West Indies . Ophthalmology . 1989;96:1363-1368.Article
14.
Sommer A.  Intraocular pressure and glaucoma . Am J Ophthalmol . 1989;107:186-188.
15.
Kass MA, Gordon MO, Hoff MR, et al.  Topical timolol administration reduces the incidence of glaucomatous damage in ocular hypertensive individuals . Arch Ophthalmol . 1989;107:1590-1598.Article
16.
Armaly MF, Krueger DE, Maunder L, et al.  Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study, I: summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual field defects . Arch Ophthalmol . 1980;98:2163-2171.Article
17.
Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Johnson CA.  Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma . Am J Ophthalmol . 1989;108:636-642.
18.
Caprioli J, Spaeth GL.  Comparison of visual field defects in low-tension and high-tension glaucoma . Am J Ophthalmol . 1984;97:730-737.
19.
Lewis RA, Heyreh SS, Phelps CD.  Optic disc and visual field correlations in primary open-angle and low-tension glaucoma . Am J Ophthalmol . 1983;96:148-152.
20.
Leske MC.  The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review . Am J Epidemiol . 1983;118:166-191.
21.
Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland D, Anderson DR. A comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. In press.
22.
Kosoko O, Sommer A, Auer C.  Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination: impact of age and ocular status . Arch Ophthalmol . 1986;104:398-401.Article
23.
Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss . Arch Ophthalmol . 1991;109:77-83.Article
×