[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.249.135. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1991

Is the Ophthalmologist as a Clinician-Scientist Still Viable?

Author Affiliations

Boston, Mass

Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(11):1523-1524. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080110059034

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

When I was in medical school over 20 years ago, among the higher truths that I was taught was the belief in the importance and high priority of clinicians' active involvement in research activities. The nature of medical discovery was such that it often required a physician-initiated research endeavor to bring the knowledge of science to improved treatment of human disease. The fear among physicians of choosing a career as clinician-scientist was that one might prove unworthy and not succeed, but the merit of the pursuit was never in doubt. The stated goals of most departments of ophthalmology involved nurturing and protecting such investigation-oriented physicians. Finding new knowledge that could be applied to human disease was the most sacred and important of pathways, and was part of the philosophy that it was important for physicians to "return something to the system" that had helped foster their careers.

Although the above

×