[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.169.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1995

Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmologic Disorders

Author Affiliations

From the Optics and Visual Assessment Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento. The authors have no financial interest in the methods or products mentioned in this article.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(4):475-481. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100040095033
Abstract

Objective:  To evaluate the efficacy of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the assessment of patients with neuro-ophthalmologic disorders, especially optic neuropathies.

Methods:  A modified Humphrey field analyzer was used to perform standard automated perimetry and SWAP, a technique that isolates the activity of short-wavelength-sensitive ("blue") mechanisms. Forty patients (80 eyes) were evaluated by SWAP and standard automated perimetry. Thirteen patients (26 eyes) had recovered from optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (30 eyes) were in various stages of treatment for pseudotumor cerebri, and 12 (24 eyes) had other miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions. Six additional patients (12 eyes) with neuro-ophthalmologic conditions were tested twice on different days during a 2-week period, with the order of SWAP and standard perimetric testing being reversed on the second day.

Results:  Of the 80 eyes tested, 38 (48%) had SWAP visual fields that were worse than standard automated perimetry results; 29 (36%) showed no difference between standard and SWAP visual fields; and 13 (16%) had standard automated perimetry results that were worse than SWAP visual fields. Of the 26 eyes in patients with optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (58%) had SWAP results that were worse than standard visual fields. Ten (33%) of the 30 eyes with pseudotumor cerebri had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results, and 13 (54%) of 24 eyes with miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results. For the 12 eyes undergoing repeated testing, SWAP visual fields were worse when they were performed last, perhaps indicating that some fatigue effect was present. This was observed for standard visual fields as well, but to a smaller extent.

Conclusions:  Preliminary findings suggest that SWAP may be useful in detecting certain neuro-ophthalmologic deficits more readily than standard automated visual field testing, especially for optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Further evaluations will be necessary to define the effects of fatigue for SWAP visual fields in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.

References
1.
Harrington DO, Hoyt WF.  Ultraviolet radiation perimetry with monochromatic blue stimuli . Arch Ophthalmol . 1955;53:870-881.Article
2.
Hedin A, Verriest G.  Is clinical colour perimetry useful? Doc Ophthalmol . 1981;26:161-184.
3.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD.  Blue-on yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss . Arch Ophthalmol . 1993;111:645-650.Article
4.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ.  Blue-on-yellow perimetry: a 5-year overview . In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/93 . New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1993:459-466.
5.
Casson EJ, Johnson CA, Shapiro LR.  Longitudinal comparison of temporalmodulation perimetry with white-on-white and blue-on-yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma . J Opt Soc Am A . 1993;10:1792-1806.Article
6.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ.  Short-wavelength-sensitive perimetry (SWSP) can predict which glaucoma suspects will develop visual field loss . In: Parel JM, ed. Progess in Biomedical Optics: Proceedings of Ophthalmic Technologies II . Bellingham, Wash: SPE Publications; 1992;1644:230-236.
7.
Sample PA, Martinez GA, Weinreb RN.  Color visual fields: a 5-year prospective study in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma . In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/93 . New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1993:467-473.
8.
Sample PA, Weinreb RN.  Progressive color visual field loss in glaucoma . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1992;33:240-243.
9.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD.  Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss for blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry . Arch Ophthalmol . 1993;111:651-656.Article
10.
Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Boynton RM.  Isolating color vision loss of primary open angle glaucoma . Am J Ophthalmol . 1988;106:686-691.
11.
Sample PA, Weinreb RN.  Color perimetry for assessment of primary open angle glaucoma . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1990;31:1869-1875.
12.
Heron G, Adams AJ, Husted R.  Central visual fields for short wavelength sensitive pathways in glaucoma and ocular hypertension . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1988;29:64-72.
13.
Weinreb RN, Sample PA.  Short-wavelength visual field testing in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma . In: Krigelstein GK, ed. Glaucoma Update IV . Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1991:146-155.
14.
Adams AJ, Johnson CA, Lewis RA.  S cone pathway sensitivity loss in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma has nerve fiber bundle pattern . In: Drum B, Moreland JD, Serra A, eds. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of the International Research Group on Colour Vision Deficiencies . Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers; 1991:535-542.
15.
Sample PA, Taylor JDN, Martinez G, Lusky M, Weinreb RN.  Short wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk . Am J Ophthalmol . 1993;115:225-233.
16.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA.  Automated perimetry of short-wavelength sensitive mechanisms in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: preliminary findings . In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89 . New York, NY: Kugler & Ghedini; 1989:31-37.
17.
Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM, Adams AJ.  Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in low, medium and high risk ocular hypertensives: initial baseline results . Arch Ophthalmol . 1995;113:70-76.Article
18.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Twelker J, Quigg JM.  Age-related changes in central visual field for short-wavelength-sensitive pathways . J Opt Soc Am . 1988;5:2131-2139.Article
19.
Lutze, M, Bresnick GH.  Lens-corrected visual field sensitivity and diabetes . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1994;35:649-655.
20.
Johnson CA, Howard DL, Marshall D, Shu H.  A noninvasive video-based method of measuring lens transmission properties of the human eye . Optom Vis Sci . 1993;70:944-955.Article
21.
Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW, Optic Neuritis Study Group.  Baseline visual field profile of optic neuritis: the experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial . Arch Ophthalmol . 1993;111:231-234.Article
22.
Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA.  Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observes . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1989;30:2056-2064.
23.
Moss ID, Wild JM, Whitaker D.  Learning effects in blue-yellow perimetry . In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/93 . New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1993:467-471.
24.
Sample PA, Weinreb RN.  Variability and sensitivity of short wavelength color visual fields in normal and glaucoma eyes . In: Rubin G, ed. Technical Digest: Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System . Washington, DC: Optical Society of America; 1993:292-295.
25.
Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA, Casson EJ, Adams AJ.  Long and short term variability for perimetry of short wavelength sensitive (SWS) mechanisms . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1990;31( (suppl) ):190. Abstract.
26.
Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, King-Smith PE.  Correlation of chromatic, spatial, and temporal sensitivity in optic nerve disease . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1991;32:3252-3262.
27.
Dain SJ, Rammohan KW, Benes SC, King-Smith PE.  Chromatic, spatial and temporal losses of sensitivity in multiple sclerosis . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1990;31:548-558.
28.
Johnson CA.  Selective vs nonselective losses in glaucoma . J Glaucoma . 1994;3( (suppl) ):S32-S44.
×