[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.169.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1996

Effect of Adhered Bacteria on the Binding of Acanthamoeba to Hydrogel Lenses

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Biology, Georgia State University (Mr Gorlin and Drs Gabriel and Ahearn), and the Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine (Dr Wilson), Atlanta, Ga.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(5):576-580. doi:10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130568013
Abstract

Objective:  To determine the effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis on the binding of Acanthamoeba species to hydrogel lenses.

Methods:  Cells of amebae and bacteria were incubated with different types of hydrogel lenses. Densities of amebae that were bound to the lenses after rinsing were determined from direct counts with a cell detachment procedure and from scintillation counts of cells, which were radiolabeled with tritiated leucine.

Results:  With both methods, amebae showed significantly increased binding to hydrogel lenses with attached P aeruginosa. The numbers of amebae that were retained on lenses with attached S epidermidis were not significantly different from those that were retained on lenses without bacteria. The binding of amebae to unworn hydrogel lenses, in contrast to the irreversible adherence of P aeruginosa, was tenuous.

Conclusions:  The binding of Acanthamoeba species to unworn hydrogel lenses was tenuous and appeared to be related to water content, surface tensions, and ionic charge. The presence of adhered P aeruginosa on the hydrogel lenses facilitated the binding of Acanthamoeba species. The cocontamination of lens systems with bacteria (eg, P aeruginosa) may be a prime factor in the development of amebic keratitis.

References
1.
Cohen EJ, Parlato CJ, Arentsen JJ, et al.  Medical and surgical treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis . Am J Ophthalmol . 1987;103:615-625.
2.
Moore MB, McCulley JP, Newton C, McDonald MB, Visvesvara GS.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: a growing problem in soft and hard contact lens wearers . Ophthalmology . 1987;94:1654-1661.Article
3.
Donzis PB, Mondino BJ, Weissman BA, Bruckner DA.  Microbial analysis of contact lens care systems contaminated with Acanthamoeba . Am J Ophthalmol . 1989;108:53-56.
4.
Larkin DFP, Kilvington SK, Easty DL.  Contamination of contact lens storage cases by Acanthamoeba and bacteria . Br J Ophthalmol . 1990;70:133-135.Article
5.
Kilvington S, Larkin DFP.  Acanthamoeba adherence to contact lenses and removal by cleaning agents . Eye . 1990;4:589-593.Article
6.
John T, Desai D, Sahm D.  Adherence of Acanthamoeba castellanii to new daily wear, extended wear, and disposable soft contact lenses . CLAO J . 1991;17:109-113.
7.
Moore MB, Ubelaker J, Silvany R, Martin J, McCulley JP.  Scanning electron microscopy of Acanthamoeba castellanii: adherence to surfaces of new and used contact lenses and to human corneal button epithelium . Rev Infect Dis . 1991;13( (suppl) ):423.Article
8.
Kelly LD,  Lijun Xu. The effect of Acanthamoeba concentration on adherence to four types of unworn soft contact lenses . CLAO J . 1995;21:27-30.
9.
Kilvington S.  Acanthamoeba trophozoite and cyst adherence to four types of soft contact lens and removal by cleaning agents . Eye . 1993;7:535-538.Article
10.
Perkovich BT, Meisler DM, McMahon JT, Rutherford I.  Adherence of Acanthamoeba to soft contact lenses . Rev Infect Dis . 1991;13( (suppl 5) ):S421-S422.Article
11.
Seal DV, Bennett ES, Mcfadyen AK, Todds E, Tomlinson A.  Differential adherence of Acanthamoeba to contact lenses: effects of material characteristics . Optom Vis Sci . 1995;72:23-28.Article
12.
Dart JK, Badenoch PR.  Bacterial adherence to contact lenses . CLAO J . 1986;12:220-224.
13.
Duran JA, Refojo MF, Gipson IK, Kenyon KR.  Pseudomonas attachment to new hydrogel contact lenses . Arch Ophthalmol . 1987;105:106-109.Article
14.
Miller MJ, Ahearn DG.  Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses and other substrata . J Clin Microbiol . 1987;25:1392-1397.
15.
Butrus SI, Klotz SA, Misra RP.  The adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to soft contact lenses . Ophthalmology . 1987;94:1310-1314.Article
16.
Aswad MI, John T, Barza M, Kenyon K, Baum J.  Bacterial adherence to extended-wear soft contact lenses . Ophthalmology . 1990;97:296-302.Article
17.
Ogbunude POJ, Asiri S, Baer HP, Warhurst DC.  New method for detachment and quantitation of Acanthamoeba trophozoites in culture . Trop Med Parasitol . 1991;42:415-416.
18.
Klink F, Alizadeh H, Stewart GL, et al.  Characterization and pathogenic potential of a soil isolate and an ocular isolate of Acanthamoeba keratitis . Curr Eye Res . 1992;12:1207-1220.Article
19.
Sawant AD, Gabriel MM, Mayo MS, Ahearn DG.  Radiopacity additives in silicone stent materials reduce in vitro bacterial adherence . Curr Microbiol . 1991;22:285-292.Article
20.
Kelly LD, Long D, Mitra D.  Quantitative comparison of Acanthamoeba castellanii adherence to rigid versus soft contact lenses . CLAO J . 1995;21:111-113.
21.
Gordon VR, Asem EK, Vodkin MH, McLaughlin GL.  Acanthamoeba binds to extracellular matrix proteins in vitro . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1993;34:658-660.
22.
Bottone EJ, Madayag RM, Qureshi MN.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: synergy between amebic and bacterial cocontaminants in contact lens care systems as a prelude to infection . J Clin Microbiol . 1992;30:2447-2450.
23.
Bottone EJ, Perez AA, Gordon RE, Qureshi MN.  Differential binding capacity and internalisation of bacterial substrates as factors in growth rate of Acanthamoeba spp . J Med Microbiol . 1994;40:148-154.Article
24.
Preston TM, King CA.  Binding sites for bacterial flagella at the surface of the soil amoeba Acanthamoeba . J Gen Microbiol . 1984;130:1449-1458.
25.
Larkin DFG, Leeming JP.  Quantitative alterations of the commensal eye bacteria in contact lens wear . Eye . 1991;5:70-74.Article
×