[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
December 1998

Selection of Materials for Orbital Floor Reconstruction

Author Affiliations


Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(12):1398-1401. doi:10.1001/archotol.124.12.1398

When a blowout fracture with a clinically significant orbital floor defect is repaired, autologous material is preferable for the orbital floor graft.

A clinically significant orbital floor defect will be defined as a gap remaining after reduction or elevation of orbital floor fracture fragments that requires a semirigid implant to avoid postoperative enophthalmos or orbital dystopia. Therefore, this definition excludes small defects (<5 mm in width) where Gelfilm (Pharmacia and Upjohn Inc, Kalamazoo, Mich) or fascia could be used without the need for rigid or semirigid support of the orbital contents.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview