What is the association between oral cavity cancer margins and local recurrence (LR), whether assessed on the main specimen or tumor bed?
In this retrospective cohort study of 406 patients with oral cavity cancer, prognostic stratification using both tumor bed frozen margins and main specimen margins was informative. Patients with involved intraoperative frozen specimens “cleared” by additional resection had 27% LR, which was not statistically different from microscopically positive margins that were not ultimately cleared.
The specimen margin is an important predictor of outcome, even if margins are taken from the tumor bed. Using intraoperative frozen margins to guide clearing margins does not improve prognosis associated with a microscopically positive margin.
There is controversy surrounding surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), with debate regarding the assessment and prognostic value of margins.
To analyze a large cohort of OCSCC cases for correlation between tumor specimen margins and intraoperative tumor bed frozen margins and evaluate how margin status associates with local recurrence and survival.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Retrospective cohort study of 406 patients treated with OCSCC resection between 2005 and 2014 at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Included cases underwent margin evaluation on the tumor specimen and intraoperative frozen margin assessment from the tumor bed.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Findings of intraoperative frozen margin analysis as a test of tumor specimen margins; local recurrence and survival based on margin findings; prognosis based on clearance of positive frozen margins. To evaluate whether additional resection to “clear” positive frozen margins affected prognosis, we compared local recurrence rates for patients in 3 groups: group A included those patients with negative margins on both intraoperative and permanent specimens; group B included those with positive intraoperative margins subsequently cleared by additional resection to negative margins; and group C included those with negative intraoperative but positive permanent specimen margins.
The median age of the 406 patients (234 men and 172 women) was 61 years (interquartile range, 53-72 years). When frozen margins were correlated with tumor specimen margins, frozen margin accuracy was 65%, with a 46% false-negative rate. We observed a local recurrence rate of 36% (95% CI, 24%-49%) when invasive carcinoma was present at an intraoperative frozen margin and 45% (95% CI, 34%-57%) when invasive carcinoma was found on the permanent specimen margin compared with 19% (95% CI, 14%-26%) and 13% (95% CI, 7%-22%) for completely negative frozen and permanent margin findings, respectively. There was a significant difference in local recurrence between group A (13%) and group B (27%) (absolute difference, 14%; 95% CI, 3%-26%) and between group A and group C (34%) (absolute difference, 21%; 95% CI, 8%-34%), but there was no difference between groups B and C (absolute difference, 7%; 95% CI, −8% to 22%), suggesting that additional resection to clear positive frozen margins does not improve prognosis.
Conclusions and Relevance
Intraoperative frozen margins from the tumor bed are not ideal predictors of positive margins on the main specimen. Both frozen and specimen margins are associated with local recurrence, but the specimen margin has the stronger association. Importantly, we demonstrate that clearing positive frozen margins from the tumor bed is not associated with improved outcomes.
Buchakjian MR, Tasche KK, Robinson RA, Pagedar NA, Sperry SM. Association of Main Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status With Local Recurrence and Survival in Oral Cancer Surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(12):1191-1198. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2329