[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.189.139. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1997

Criteria for Selective Management of the Orbital Rim and Floor in Zygomatic Complex and Midface Fractures

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Dr Shumrick) and Ophthalmology (Drs Kersten and Kulwin), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Dr Smith is in private practice in Great Falls, Mont.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(4):378-384. doi:10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040020003
Abstract

Objective:  To develop objective criteria with which to identify patients with zygomatic complex (ZMC) or midface fractures who require a surgical exploration and treatment of the orbital component of their fracture to prevent postoperative enophthalmos, diplopia, or malar depression.

Design:  Nonrandomized, prospective management of facial trauma patients.

Setting:  Urban, university referral center.

Participants:  Ninety-seven patients with facial fractures (72 with ZMC fractures and 25 with midface fractures) who presented to the maxillofacial and oculoplastics trauma teams at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, for management.

Intervention:  The decision whether to include an orbital exploration as part of the management plan was made based on a specific set of physical and radiological criteria that are detailed in the text.

Outcome Measure:  Patients were evaluated postoperatively for possible complications related to the orbital and periorbital portions of their fractures.

Results:  Thirty-four percent of the study patients (30% of the patients with ZMC fractures and 44% of the patients with midface fractures) underwent orbital rim exposure and orbital floor exploration as part of their fracture management. Sixty-six percent of these patients (70% of the patients with ZMC fractures and 56% of the patients with midface fractures) were managed without orbital exploration. Postoperatively, none of the patients who did not undergo exploration experienced diplopia or enophthalmos and only 1 patient had a residual malar depression.

Conclusions:  The criteria reported herein allow surgeons to identify the minority of patients with midfacial and ZMC fractures who require an orbital exploration for optimal fracture management. Orbital exploration, and its potential complications, can be avoided in the majority of patients with ZMC and midface fractures without significantly increasing the risk of morbidity related to the orbital component of their fractures.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:378-384

×