[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.179.146. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1997

Markers for Assessment of Nodal Metastasis in Laryngeal Carcinoma

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Takes and Baatenburg de Jong), Pathology (Drs Schuuring, Litvinov, and van Krieken and Mr Vis), and Biostatistics (Dr Hermans), University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(4):412-419. doi:10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040048008
Abstract

Background:  Regional metastasis is an important factor in the treatment and prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Although in recent years imaging techniques have improved, it is still impossible to detect small metastatic deposits. Metastasis is mainly determined by properties of the primary tumor and its interaction with surrounding structures.

Objective:  To identify markers that predict the presence of metastasis based on the features of the primary tumor.

Design:  Correlation of the results of histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological analysis with clinical and histopathological data.

Materials and Methods:  Several histological features and biological markers were examined in 31 laryngeal carcinomas. The following markers were selected on their putative role in the process of metastasis and were studied using immunohistochemical and/or Southern blot techniques: proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA),p53, retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene (Rb), myc, bcl-2 (inhibitor of apoptosis), epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF-receptor (EGFR), neu, nm23 (also known as NME1, putative metastasis suppressor), desmoplakin, neuron cell-adhesion molecule (N-CAM), epithelial cell-adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM), E-cadherin, cyclin D1 (CCND1), and EMS1.

Results:  The presence of an inflammatory reaction surrounding the tumor (P=.07), eosinophilic infiltration (P=.16), positive immunostaining for Rb (P=.02), negative immunostaining for Ep-CAM (P=.13), and amplification of CCND1 and EMS1 (P=.05) correlated with nodal metastasis. The combination of an inflammatory reaction, eosinophilic infiltration, and staining for Rb and Ep-CAM resulted in a superior accuracy in assessing nodal metastasis.

Conclusions:  These results indicate that it is possible to predict and exclude lymph node metastasis by studying the features of the primary tumor only. When these results are confirmed in a larger series, biological markers may be powerful diagnostic tools with great impact on clinical decision making.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:412-419

×