[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
View showing sharply deflected septum to the left with the caudal edge displaced to the right side of the vestibule.

View showing sharply deflected septum to the left with the caudal edge displaced to the right side of the vestibule.

Figure 2.
View showing complete exposure of the deformed caudal septum using an open rhinoplasty approach.

View showing complete exposure of the deformed caudal septum using an open rhinoplasty approach.

Figure 3.
View showing complete disarticulation of the severely deflected caudal septum.

View showing complete disarticulation of the severely deflected caudal septum.

Figure 4.
View showing use of a "plating" cartilage graft in stabilizing the corrrectly realigned caudal septum.

View showing use of a "plating" cartilage graft in stabilizing the corrrectly realigned caudal septum.

Figure 5.
View showing further stabilization of the corrected caudal septal complex to the upper lateral cartilages.

View showing further stabilization of the corrected caudal septal complex to the upper lateral cartilages.

Figure 6.
View showing accurate correction of the caudal septal deformity.

View showing accurate correction of the caudal septal deformity.

Figure 7.
Patient 1. Left, Preoperative view showing sharp left septal deflection with the caudal edge severely displaced to the right vestibule. Right, Postoperative view showing correction of the severe caudal septal deformity.

Patient 1. Left, Preoperative view showing sharp left septal deflection with the caudal edge severely displaced to the right vestibule. Right, Postoperative view showing correction of the severe caudal septal deformity.

Figure 8.
View showing securing an osseous or cartilaginous graft to the weakened caudal septum. Adapted from Digman.

View showing securing an osseous or cartilaginous graft to the weakened caudal septum. Adapted from Digman.5

Figure 9.
View showing bilateral ethmoid sandwich grafting for caudal septal defects. Adapted from Metzinger et al.

View showing bilateral ethmoid sandwich grafting for caudal septal defects. Adapted from Metzinger et al.8

Figure 10.
View showing cartilage "plating" rigid fixation graft for caudal septal defects.

View showing cartilage "plating" rigid fixation graft for caudal septal defects.

Results of 36 Patients With Severe Caudal Septal Defect*
Results of 36 Patients With Severe Caudal Septal Defect*
1.
Metzenbaum  M Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage versus submucous resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1929;9282- 296Article
2.
Peer  L.A An operation to repair lateral displacement of the lower border of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1937;25475- 477Article
3.
Foman  S Reimplantation of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1948;477- 20Article
4.
Converse  JM Corrective and reconstructive surgery of the nose. Converse  JMed.Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Vol 2 Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1977; (chap 29.)
5.
Digman  RO Correction of nasal deformities due to defects of the septum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1956;18291- 304Article
6.
Dupont  CCloutier  GEPrevost  Y Autogenous vomer bone graft for permanent correction of the cartilaginous septal deviations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38243- 247Article
7.
Goode  RL Nasal septal surgery. Krause  CJMangat  DSPastoreck  Neds.Aesthetic Facial Surgery Philadelphia, Pa JB Lipincott Co1991;
8.
Metzinger  SEBoyce  GGigby  PLJoseph  JJAnderson  JR Ethmoid bone sandwich grafting for caudal septal defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;1201121- 1125Article
9.
Goodman  WSCharbonneau  PA External approach to rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1974;842195- 2201Article
10.
Anderson  JRRies  WR Rhinoplasty: Emphasizing the External Approach.  New York, NY Thieme Medical Publishers Inc1986;
11.
Stoll  DAFurnas  DW The growth of cartilage transplants in baby rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;45356- 359Article
12.
Dupertis  SM Growth of young human autogenous cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1950;5486- 493Article
13.
Hagerty  RFBraid  HLBonner  WM  et al.  Viable and nonviable human cartilage homografts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;125485- 492
14.
Smith  JDAbramson  M Membranous vs endochondral autografts. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;99203- 205Article
15.
Kuziak  JFZins  JERing  EWhitaker  LA The early revascularization of membranous bone grafts. Surg Forum. 1981;32567- 568
16.
Goode  RL Bone and cartilage grafts: current concepts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1972;5447- 455
17.
Kazangian  V Bone transplanting to the mandible. Am J Surg. 1952;83633- 639Article
18.
Jeneke  JBWright  WK Studies of the support of the nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;93458- 464Article
19.
Petroff  MAMcCollough  EGHom  DAnderson  JR Nasal tip projection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117783- 788Article
Original Article
August 2000

Correction of Severe Caudal Deflections With a Cartilage "Plating" Rigid Fixation Graft

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology, Emory University, Buckhead Facial Plastic Surgery, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Dyer) and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Queens, NY (Dr Kang). The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(8):973-978. doi:10.1001/archotol.126.8.973
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate a technique for correction of severe caudal septal defects.

Design  For all patients, preoperative photographs were analyzed and subjective nasal airway patency surveys were conducted. The caudal septal defects were then repaired with the cartilage "plating" rigid fixation technique. The intraoperative findings were documented in pictorial diagrams. Postoperative photographs and repeated airway surveys were obtained during the subsequent follow-up visits. Preoperative data and long-term postoperative data were compared and analyzed.

Setting  Private practice, ambulatory surgical center.

Patients  Thirty-six patients had significant caudal septal deviations and functional airway obstruction.

Main Outcome Measures  Accuracy and stability of the correction, airway improvement, patient satisfaction, and morbidity.

Results  Since 1988, 36 patients were treated for severe caudal septal defects using cartilage plating rigid fixation. Follow-up visits have ranged from 3 to more than 9 years. All patients have maintained an accurate correction of their caudal septal deflections. All patients have also noted subjective improvement of their nasal airway. No complication has been encountered.

Conclusion  Cartilage plating rigid fixation seems to be an effective method of correcting the functional problems associated with severe caudal septal deformities.

SEVERE CAUDAL septal deflections that create nasal airway obstruction have always been challenging to correct surgically. The caudal edge of the septum is often displaced into one or both sides of the nasal vestibule with resultant nasal airway obstruction (Figure 1). The surgeon's challenge is to straighten accurately the sharply deflected caudal septum to restore nasal function.

Metzenbaum,1 in 1929, was the first to specifically address the difficulty in treating anterior septal deformities. Many others28 have since attempted to correct this difficult problem with variable success. One of the more generally accepted methods of correcting the severely deviated caudal septum entails the use of the Metzenbaum "swinging door" maneuver with suture fixation of the cartilage to the nasal spine. This is often in conjunction with wedging, scoring, or morselizing the septal cartilage. The weakened cartilage is often splinted with a batten graft.

Our approach to the surgical correction uses the open rhinoplasty approach. The open rhinoplasty approach provides complete exposure and an accurate assessment of the severity of the caudal deviation as it relates to the surrounding structures. This wide exposure also facilitates accurate correction of the caudal septal defects. The first part of the repair entails releasing all the forces and tension involved in the septal defect. The second part entails restoring the septum to a proper position using a cartilage "plating" rigid fixation technique. It is important to distinguish the function of the cartilage plating graft as a strategically placed rigid fixator rather than as a mere buttress for extensively scored or morselized caudal septum. The principle of this function is similar to that of a miniplate, which prevents rotation when used in a 2-point fixation of a tripod fracture. Once the caudal septum is accurately stabilized into its corrected position, the inherent strength of the cartilage is maintained by the rigid cartilage plating ridgid fixation graft.

A retrospective review of 36 patients who underwent correction of severe caudal septal deflections was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in restoring nasal airway patency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1, 1988, and March 31, 1995, 36 patients were initially seen in our office with severe caudal septal defects causing nasal airway obstruction. For all patients, preoperative photographs were obtained. All surgical procedures and documentations of the intraoperative findings were performed by one of us (W.K.D.). Postoperative photographs were obtained during subsequent follow-up visits at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and then every 3 months for the first year. Thereafter, the patients were seen annually. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were compared to assess the degree of accuracy achieved with the initial correction. The stability of the correction was assessed by physical examination and by studying the serial photographs obtained during the postoperative period.

Preoperatively, subjective nasal airway status was noted in all 36 patients. Postoperatively, beginning at 1 month, patients were asked to evaluate their nasal airway status as being either considerably improved, marginally improved, the same, or worse than preoperatively.

After informed consents were obtained, 36 patients underwent correction of the caudal septal defects using the cartilage plating rigid fixation technique. The open technique is approached in its usual manner by initially making an inverted "V" columellar incision with a No. 15 blade. It is joined with a marginal incision. The columellar flap is freed and the dissection is carried superolaterally over the domes and down along the lower lateral crus, and then over the dorsum of the nose.9,10 Lateral displacement of the domes of the lower lateral cartilage allows excellent visualization of the septal angle and the attachment of the dorsal septum to the upper lateral cartilages. Caudal exposure is obtained by separating the medial crura, thus, exposing the entire length of the caudal border of the septum and its attachment to the nasal spine (Figure 2).

Beginning at the superior septal angle, a submucoperichondrial and submucoperiosteal septal flap are completely elevated on both sides. At this point, any associated poste rior septal deflection is first corrected by excising an appropriate amount of the involved posterior septum. The excision is conservatively performed, always maintaining at least a 1-cm strip of dorsal and caudal septal cartilage. A 1.5 × 1-cm plating graft is then harvested from the resected posterior septal cartilage. The deviated caudal septum is then released inferiorly along the maxillary crest and nasal spine. When the caudal septal deflection extends superiorly to the nasal dorsum, the caudal septum is completely divided from its dorsal attachment. The combined inferior and dorsal division results in complete disarticulation of the severely deflected caudal septum (Figure 3).

The freed caudal septum is often sparingly trimmed in the region of the nasal spine to obtain a straighter edge. The straightened caudal septum is then realigned to its correct anatomical position and stabilized by first fixating it to the anterior nasal spine inferiorly using a 5-0 clear polypropylene (Prolene) suture. A cartilage plating graft is used to rigidly secure the superior end of the caudal septum to the remaining dorsal septum. The graft is fixated into place using a 5-0 polypropylene suture (Figure 4). The newly aligned dorsal-caudal septal complex is further stabilized by securing it to the upper lateral cartilage using a 5-0 clear polypropylene suture (Figure 5). The septal flaps are then closed using the basting suture technique with a 4-0 plain catgut suture on a Keith needle. This maneuver effectively compartmentalizes the caudal septum in a tight pocket of reapproximated mucoperichondrium, and further stabilizes the corrected caudal septum. This is followed by an accurate reconstitution of the medial crura using a 5-0 clear polypropylene suture. The closure of the nose is then performed by meticulous reapproximation of the horizontal and vertical components of the columellar incision using a 6-0 fast-absorbing gut suture. This is followed by closure of the marginal incisions with 5-0 gut sutures.

The accurate correction is readily appreciated since the caudal septum is noted to be straight and no longer obstructing the vestibule(s) (Figure 6). Likewise on palpation, the nasal tip is noted to be structurally intact.

RESULTS

Using the above method since 1988, we have treated 36 patients with severe caudal septal defects (Table 1). Twelve of the 36 patients had previously undergone a septoplasty (Table 1). Most patients had sharp caudal septal deflections involving the entire vertical length, usually starting from the proximity of the septal angle superiorly and extending inferiorly to the region usually 5 to 10 mm posterior to the nasal spine. In addition, most cases showed the caudal edge of the septum to be displaced into the nasal vestibule opposite the septal deflection.

The clinical examination and analysis of the photographs showed that the correction of the septal defect has remained stable throughout the long-term follow-up period (ranging from 3 to >9 years) in all 36 patients (Figure 7). In terms of functional correction, all 36 patients who had compromised nasal airway noted considerable subjective nasal airway improvement, usually within 1 month. More importantly, they were noted to maintain their nasal airway patency throughout the length of follow-up.

Potential complications including displacement or resorption of the cartilaginous plating graft leading to weakening of the caudal septum, retraction of the columella, or overshortening of the nose have not been encountered. Other complications associated with septal surgery including infection, hematoma, septal perforation, granuloma formation, synechias, or saddle nose deformities also have not been encountered.

COMMENT

The caudal septal defects are most often traumatic but also may be iatrogenic in origin. The defects, which are anterior to the nasal spine, may be easily addressed by simply shaving the caudal edge of the septum. However, the severe deflections that involve the region posterior to the nasal spine and involve the entire vertical length to the dorsal angle have proven to be technically challenging to correct. Although various methods have been discussed over the years, the severe caudal septal deformity remains a difficult problem to correct.

Metzenbaum,1 in 1929, was the first to specifically address the difficulty in treating the anterior septal deviation. He noted that posterior resection has minimal influence in correcting an anterior deviation. He, therefore, introduced the swinging door method in which a vertical wedge of the cartilage on the convex side is resected followed by repositioning of the anterior septum in a swinging door–like manner.

Peer,2 in 1937, recommended extensive excision of the septum, leaving only a strut to support the dorsum of the nose. He claimed that the tip support could be maintained with a piece of the resected septum inserted into the columella. Foman,3 in 1948, proposed a similar method using either a large strut or multiple struts placed in tandem position. He also believed that a strut introduced into the collumella without contact with the dorsal support is sufficient to maintain the collumella position and tip support without creating any retraction pockets. However, Converse,4 in 1977, demonstrated that excessive cartilage removed from the "weak triangle" in the region of the anterior septal angle can lead to a saddle nose deformity. In addition, these techniques significantly increase the risk of loss of tip projection, retraction of the columella, and overshortening of the nose.

The concept of using a batten graft to support the caudal septum area was first introduced in 1956 by Digman.5 He advocated correction of the caudal deviation by scoring and resecting strips of septal cartilage and securing an osseous or cartilaginous graft to the weakened cartilage to avoid recurrence (Figure 8). Dupont et al,6 in 1966, described a similar technique in which after the routine submucous resection, the deflections of the remaining dorsal-caudal strip of the cartilage are corrected by wedge resections. The vomer or perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone was then harvested and used as a splint to reinforce the weakened caudal septum. More recently, Goode7 has discussed use of various combinations of wedging, scoring, shaving, or morselizing the caudal septum followed by splinting the weakened caudal septum with a cartilage batten graft or bony septal graft if cartilage graft is not available. Metzinger et al8 also recently described a technique in which bilateral ethmoid bone sandwich grafting is performed (Figure 9).

Our method entails first obtaining a wide exposure to visualize the full length of the caudal septum from the dorsum to the nasal spine. The procedure is performed through a bilateral elevation of the mucoperichondrial flaps to relieve all "tension" forces between the mucoperichondrium and the septal cartilage. Typically, deviation involving the caudal septum is judiciously approached with partial wedging, scoring, or morselizing. The deflections involving the dorsal edge of the caudal septum are approached even more cautiously for fear of losing dorsal septal support. As a result, the remaining unrelieved septal "spring" force may cause persistent or recurrent septal deflection. In these difficult situations, complete vertical disarticulation can be performed safely so long as the restored caudal septum is rigidly stabilized as shown in this technique.

Others have substantially weakened the caudal septum by either extensive scoring or by morselization and then buttressing the whole length of the weakened septum with a batten graft.57 This method would require a larger graft that may not be readily available in the posterior septal area. In addition, it may cause significant thickening of the septum, especially if bilateral sandwich grafts are used.

It is important to distinguish our cartilage graft as a plating graft that rigidly fixates and maintains the inherent strength of the caudal septum rather than as a mere buttress for a previously weakened septum (Figure 10). This rigid fixation prevents any rotation of the caudal septum, thus minimizing any chance of recurrent deviation. This principle is analogous to the use of a single rigid plate in a 2-point fixation of a tripod fracture.

In terms of choosing the plating graft for use in the caudal septal area, we believe that the autogenous cartilage grafts are superior to other grafts. Autogenous cartilage grafts in a suitable vascular bed can survive by transfer of living chondrocytes that grow and remain viable.11,12 Preserved or irradiated homografts and heterografts are devoid of any living chondrocytes and provide only a matrix that is slowly absorbed and replaced by fibrous in-growth from the recipient bed.13 This may eventually result in reduced stabilization and recurrence of the septal deformity. In terms of bone grafts, membranous bone seems to be superior to endochondral bone with greater revascularization and survival rate.14,15 In general, however, bone grafts require good bone fixation to survive optimally.16,17 The caudal septal area is probably not an ideal recipient bed, and bone graft placed in this site may eventually lead to an unpredictable outcome.

Finally, to obtain the exposure for this type of repair, many of the nasal tip supporting mechanisms are compromised.18,19 These supporting mechanisms must be meticulously reconstructed and often augmented with the use of a columellar strut graft.

CONCLUSION

We have discussed in this article our method of correcting severe caudal septal defects that entails using an open rhinoplasty approach to gain wide exposure, releasing all the forces involved in the septal deflection, restoring the septum to a proper position using a rigid fixation technique, and reconstructing the tip supporting mechanisms. Although this method proves to be technically more challenging, the cartilage plating rigid fixation technique seems to be an effective and long-lasting method of correcting functional problems associated with severe caudal septal deformities.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for publication March 13, 2000.

We thank Mark N. Beaty, MD, and Jeanette Hart for their support and contribution in preparing the manuscript.

Corresponding author: John Kang, MD, Metropolitan Otolaryngology & Facial Plastic, 41-03 Union St, Flushing, NY 11355.

References
1.
Metzenbaum  M Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage versus submucous resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1929;9282- 296Article
2.
Peer  L.A An operation to repair lateral displacement of the lower border of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1937;25475- 477Article
3.
Foman  S Reimplantation of the septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol. 1948;477- 20Article
4.
Converse  JM Corrective and reconstructive surgery of the nose. Converse  JMed.Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Vol 2 Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1977; (chap 29.)
5.
Digman  RO Correction of nasal deformities due to defects of the septum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1956;18291- 304Article
6.
Dupont  CCloutier  GEPrevost  Y Autogenous vomer bone graft for permanent correction of the cartilaginous septal deviations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38243- 247Article
7.
Goode  RL Nasal septal surgery. Krause  CJMangat  DSPastoreck  Neds.Aesthetic Facial Surgery Philadelphia, Pa JB Lipincott Co1991;
8.
Metzinger  SEBoyce  GGigby  PLJoseph  JJAnderson  JR Ethmoid bone sandwich grafting for caudal septal defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;1201121- 1125Article
9.
Goodman  WSCharbonneau  PA External approach to rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1974;842195- 2201Article
10.
Anderson  JRRies  WR Rhinoplasty: Emphasizing the External Approach.  New York, NY Thieme Medical Publishers Inc1986;
11.
Stoll  DAFurnas  DW The growth of cartilage transplants in baby rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;45356- 359Article
12.
Dupertis  SM Growth of young human autogenous cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1950;5486- 493Article
13.
Hagerty  RFBraid  HLBonner  WM  et al.  Viable and nonviable human cartilage homografts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;125485- 492
14.
Smith  JDAbramson  M Membranous vs endochondral autografts. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;99203- 205Article
15.
Kuziak  JFZins  JERing  EWhitaker  LA The early revascularization of membranous bone grafts. Surg Forum. 1981;32567- 568
16.
Goode  RL Bone and cartilage grafts: current concepts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1972;5447- 455
17.
Kazangian  V Bone transplanting to the mandible. Am J Surg. 1952;83633- 639Article
18.
Jeneke  JBWright  WK Studies of the support of the nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;93458- 464Article
19.
Petroff  MAMcCollough  EGHom  DAnderson  JR Nasal tip projection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117783- 788Article
×