[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.127.188. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
August 1918

INFANTILISM, WITH TWO CASES OF THE BRISSAUD AND THE FRÖLICH TYPES, RESPECTIVELY

Author Affiliations

Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania. PHILADELPHIA

Am J Dis Child. 1918;16(2):103-108. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1918.01910140042004
Abstract

The subject of infantilism has come in recent years into ever increasing prominence. The term should be applied not only to adolescents or adults who possess in some degree the bodily and often the psychic characteristics of infancy, but to children of any age in whom there is a persistence of characters, especially sexual, which belong to a period of life decidedly earlier than the actual age of the patient. Further, a sharp distinction should be drawn between infantilism and nanism. There may be dwarfs who are in no respects infantile, such as those of a rachitic or achondroplastic nature. As Hastings Gilford1 has pointed out, there has been in them an arrest of growth, but not of development. Less often there may be cases of infantilism which are the reverse of being dwarfs, as in one of the instances which I desire to record.

Much confusion still exists,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×