[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.173.184. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
August 1936

ALLERGY DUE TO MENOTOXIN OF PREGNANCY

Author Affiliations

CHICAGO
From the Pediatric Clinic and the Children's Allergy Section of the Mandel Clinic, Michael Reese Hospital.

Am J Dis Child. 1936;52(2):303-307. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1936.04140020046005
Abstract

One hesitates to report a case of allergy due to human emanation, not only because the condition is so rare and to date experimentally unattainable, but because of the fact, recently reemphasized by Vaughan and Fowlkes,1 that allergy due to cohabitation is usually traceable to a substance about the offending person other than human emanation. Encouraged by Cooper's2 recent report of allergy to human semen, however, we wish to report here the occurrence of bronchial asthma in a child due to the menotoxin of the mother during her pregnancy and puerperium.

Although the existence of menstrual toxin has been suspected and mentioned since Biblical times, the superstition was first put to scientific test by Dr. Béla Schick,3 who in 1920 showed that freshly cut flowers held in the hand of a menstruating woman for from ten to thirty minutes on the first to the third day of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×