[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
The Pediatric Forum
March 2001

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Author Affiliations

Not Available

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(3):421-422. doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.3.417

Kemper and Downs1 presented a cost-effectiveness analysis of 2 methods of identification of permanent congenital hearing loss (PCHL) but chose not to consider the benefits of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), leaving their article no more than a cost comparison. This lapse remains a fatal flaw.

Permanent congenital hearing loss is arguably the most common serious congenital anomaly. Strategies other than UNHS fail to identify sufficient proportions of affected children in a timely manner. Targeted high-risk screening can at best identify 59% of children with PCHL.1 Most studies report that fewer than 50% of children with hearing loss have identifiable risk factors.27 In practice, targeted screening programs have done even more poorly,8 which has been our experience in Oregon.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×