[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Book Reviews and Other Media
August 2001

Brush With Death: A Social History of Lead Poisoning

Author Affiliations


Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(8):975. doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.8.975

In 1956, J. Edmund Bradley and colleagues reported that 40% of children attending a well-child clinic in Baltimore had blood lead levels exceeding 50 µg/dL.1 Interestingly, most pediatricians in the late 1950s were not shocked by Bradley's report: after all, only 5% of Baltimore children had blood levels higher than 80 µg/dL, then thought to be the threshold for lead toxicity. Soon, other researchers had replicated Bradley's finds in other American cities. Still, no widespread concern arose regarding lead exposure. In sharp contrast, however, most European nations had eliminated lead from paint in the 1910s. Why, we might ask, did the United States tolerate so much environmental lead for so long?

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview