[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,015
Citations 0
Viewpoint
February 2016

Balancing Service and Education in Residency TrainingA Logical Fallacy

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 2Center for Research, Innovation, and Scholarship in Medical Education, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(2):101-102. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3816

The system of residency training in the United States has at its core a perpetual tension between service and education. Graduate medical education (GME) is financed through prospective payments to teaching hospitals, where house officers compose a significant portion of the health care workforce. Numerous changes have occurred during the past 20 years that have put increasing pressure on this delicate balance. Radical transformation in the structure and process of GME training, most notably duty hour limitations, has led to compression of work, coupled with increasing emphasis on patient safety and quality. Hospitals have simultaneously undergone equally radical changes resulting from economic forces that have intensified pressure on faculty to increase clinical productivity to generate revenue. As a result, less time is available for faculty to teach and for trainees to learn.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×