[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 491
Citations 0
Editorial
June 2016

Laboratory Accuracy in Neonatal BilirubinThe Search for Truth in Laboratory Medicine

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
  • 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(6):529-530. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0279

In this issue of JAMA Pediatrics, Kuzniewicz et al1 describe the consequences of an in vitro diagnostics manufacturer altering the values assigned to their calibrators for the determination of neonatal bilirubin concentrations. Notable in the study are the sizes of the prerecalibration population (n = 61 945) and postrecalibration group (n = 47 359). This significantly large number of newborn samples was evaluated for exceeding the American Academy of Pediatrics phototherapy threshold and the effect on phototherapy of newborns during their birth hospitalization and its effect on readmission for phototherapy. The postrecalibration resulted in patient bilirubin levels decreasing by 1.18 mg/dL (to convert to micromoles per liter, multiply by 17.1) and consequently decreasing the number of infants above the American Academy of Pediatrics phototherapy threshold. Changes to bilirubin assays are not limited to reassigning values to calibrators. Changes to different manufactured lots of reagents is very common, while changing to an alternate bilirubin assay is uncommon.2 Even instrumentation changes may result in new bilirubin assays that may occur more frequently owing to the consolidation of health systems and the need for clinical laboratories to standardize their instrumentation.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×