In Reply We thank Katz and Shah for their interest and their comments and would like to respond to their concerns.
We would like to first restate our major aim, which was to test whether the Cogmed Working Memory Training program (Pearson), offered as a population-based, selective prevention program in a school setting, would improve long-term academic outcomes in children identified after screening as having low working memory.1
Roberts G. The Jury Is Still Out on Working Memory Training—Reply. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(9):908. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1240