[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
The Pediatric Forum
November 01, 2010

Application of the Flynn Effect for the Bayley III Scales

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Robertson and Mr Biggs) and Psychology (Mr Biggs), Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta (Drs Robertson and Hendson)Edmonton, Alberta and Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Dr Acton), Canada.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(11):1072-1073. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.199

We appreciate the recent article by the Victoria Infant Collaborative Group1 and the editorial by Dr Msall2 voicing concern about underestimation of developmental delay by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–III (Bayley-III).

The Bayley Manual3 provides information about the Flynn effect, as mentioned in the Victorian Study.1(p355) The Bayley-III manual sample of 102 children gives the average Mental Developmental Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development–II (BSID-II) to be 93.9 and the Bayley-III Cognitive and Language Composite Scores (CSs) to be 102 and 99.7, respectively.3 The latter CS differences from the MDI are 8.1 and 5.8 points, with corresponding correlations of 0.60 and 0.71.3(p77) Overall, Bayley-III CSs are 7 points higher than those of the BSID-II, and thus show a reverse Flynn effect.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×