[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.124.106. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1975

The Limulus Test and Gram-Negative Bacillary Sepsis-Reply

Author Affiliations

Infectious Disease Service Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital 332 N Lauderdale Memphis, TN 38101

Am J Dis Child. 1975;129(5):644. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120420076024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Sir.—We agree that the Limulus assay is suitable for detecting endotoxemia, but contend that it is not of value in detecting Gram-negative bacillary sepsis or bacteremia. Only when the preparation and sensitivity of Limulus lysate and extraction procedure of endotoxin have been standardized can the clinical usefulness of this test be finally determined. Ultimately the physician will have to ask, "Will this test assist me in determining the diagnosis and management of my patient's condition?" If the number of false positives and false negatives is equal to or greater than the number of true positives or true negatives (based on culture-proved infections), then the test will offer no advantage over the present clinical and laboratory diagnosis of infection, and may indeed be another cost-accountable expense for the patient. To date, the published studies are only suggestive of clinical value of the assay. Further studies in large and high-risk populations

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×