[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1975

Pneumatoceles Following Hydrocarbon Ingestion-Reply

Author Affiliations

Good Samaritan Hospital 1033 E McDowell Rd Phoenix, AZ 85006
University of California School of Medicine San Francisco

Am J Dis Child. 1975;129(9):1106. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120460086025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—In response to Dr. Holmes' pertinent observations, let us say that we agree that the management of the first case was suboptimal. This points up the fact that in a large hospital with hundreds of attending physicians and dozens of house officers, a uniform approach to any selected disease rarely exists. The article, however, was not published on the pretense of describing the subtleties of therapy of hydrocarbon ingestion and never implied that the therapeutics described were to be "construed as standard care." The article makes no claim outside of reviewing the pertinent data on one selected aspect of the disease.

Nevertheless, we disagree that "all children who are symptomatic from hydrocarbon ingestion [should] be admitted to the hospital" (italics ours). This would imply that any child with slight fever or cough should be admitted regardless of time since ingestion, reliability of parents, access to medical care, or

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×