[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.178.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1976

Double Aneuploidy-Reply

Author Affiliations

Department of Genetics University of Rochester 601 Elmwood Ave Rochester, NY 14642

Am J Dis Child. 1976;130(4):444. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1976.02120050102024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—I have reviewed the karyotype shown in Fig 3 and agree that the last pair of the C group is misplaced; it is indeed pair No. 8 rather than 12. Indeed, that pair should have been positioned between 7 and 9 rather than at the end of the C group. Fortunately, that regrettable error is of no consequence with respect to the conclusions drawn in our report. Despite the displacement in the C group, the C group is normal and the aneuploidy is as reported in the G group and sex chromosomes.

I wish to thank Chen and colleagues for bringing this matter to my attention.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×