[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1983

Mumps Immunization-Reply

Author Affiliations

Office of Program Planning and Evaluation; Immunization Division Center for Prevention Services Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA 30333

Am J Dis Child. 1983;137(2):186-187. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140280078025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—The analysis proposed by Drs Welch and Beekman makes several assumptions as follows:

  1. They assume that the children are deficient only in mumps vaccine. It must be recalled that children's immunization status is being assessed generally, not just for mumps, and that children who are deficient in mumps vaccine may well also be deficient in other vaccines. Although exact data are not available, the theoretical cohort of 1 million children needing mumps vaccine may also include, for example, 500,000 children who need measles vaccine or 300,000 who need rubella vaccine.

  2. They assume that all of the vaccine administered would be administered in physicians' offices, whereas it is likely that a significant proportion would be administered through public clinics at a lower cost per immunization.

  3. They assume a half day of school absence for each child who needs mumps immunization. Experience in most states has

×