[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1983

Letter From the Editor

Author Affiliations

PO Box 43700 Tucson, AZ 85733

Am J Dis Child. 1983;137(9):923. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140350095032

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Dr Barrie's observations entitled "Campaign of Terror" reflect one viewpoint of the pertussis controversy in England. His remarks may be misconstrued in the United States if they stand alone.

England has experienced two major epidemics in the last five years; the first occurred from 1977 to 1979, and more than 100,000 cases were reported, and the second occurred in 1982, with 65,785 cases with 14 deaths. Heated debate has occurred in England concerning pertussis and pertussis vaccine. The salient points made by the pro and con debaters include the following:

  1. Pertussis vaccine is ineffective or marginally effective (the con group).

  2. Pertussis vaccine is effective but is not being administered to enough children (the pro group).

  3. Pertussis vaccine is dangerous and causes brain damage in a large number of children (the con group).

  4. Pertussis vaccine only causes brain damage rarely—once per 300,000 injections (by extrapolation once in

×