[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.169.191. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1985

Follow-up Appointments-Reply

Author Affiliations

The Johns Hopkins Hospital Park 207 Baltimore, MD 21205

Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(10):967. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140120012015

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—Dr Banco's points are well taken and deserve comment. The best, or at least a better, design would have been to observe the behavior of the residents without their knowledge and to record whether they actually provided plans for follow-up. However, this costly design was not feasible for us, and this accounts for the specifically defined criteria for follow-up visits outlined in the study.

While we do not doubt Dr Banco's experience with residents' documentations, we know of no study that shows his assertion to be true. Such a study like ours would be subject to the Hawthorne effect, unless the design assured that the residents were observed without their knowledge.

Second, while follow-up visits for otitis media may be debatable, they are generally advised in pediatric textbooks and by the faculty in our clinic, as stated in our study. We were interested in observing the residents' adherence

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×