Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
March 1987

Is It Real or Is It a Contaminant? A Guide to the Interpretation of Blood Culture Results

Author Affiliations

Department of Pediatrics Yale University School of Medicine Box 3333 New Haven, CT 06510

Am J Dis Child. 1987;141(3):241-242. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1987.04460030019009

Sir.—Clarifying the meaning of a blood culture from which a microorganism has been recovered (a positive blood culture) is a frequent reason for requesting an infectious disease consultation. The essence of the question usually being asked is whether recovery of the organism represents a true bacteremia (or fungemia) or a contaminant. Since we cannot always clearly differentiate between these two possibilities, this guide is meant to be a first step in the analysis of unclear cases. The response to this dilemma is simplified by estimating probability based on the appropriate data. This approach was developed for the analysis of clinical research data but has proven to be equally useful in practice.

Most frequently, the probability that an organism recovered from a blood culture represents a true infection is close to 100%, or else it is clearly a contaminant. A consultation is not generally requested in such obvious cases, and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview