July 1987

Decision-Making in Child Neurology

Author Affiliations

Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology Arizona Health Sciences Center Tucson, AZ 85724


by David W. Dunn and Leon G. Epstein, 327 pp, with illus, Philadelphia, BC Decker Inc, 1987.

Am J Dis Child. 1987;141(7):733. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1987.04460070035016

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


This volume is one of a series of 29 monographs in the "Clinical Decision-Making Series" published by BC Decker Inc. Using the decision-tree format, the authors depict the steps involved in proceeding logically from a neurologic

Conventional vs algorithm approach to diagnosis in child neurology.

Child with Suspected Neurologic Problem

Conventional Physical Examination and History Approach

Physician Selects Pertinent Features of Both

Decides on Appropriate Neurodiagnostic Tests, if Necessary

Algorithm Approach

Physician Follows Arrows and Avoids Thinking Logically About Problem

Incorrect Diagnosis, Inappropriate Therapy

Makes Correct Diagnosis and Formulates Treatment Plan symptom or sign to the ultimate diagnosis and appropriate management plan. The format is designed to complement material available in standard textbooks.

Two major sections are included: (1) evaluation of signs and symptoms (developmental delay, disorders of consciousness, sleep disturbances, abnormal head size, cranial nerve disorders, motor disturbances, and sensory

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview