[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 174.129.114.211. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1992

Is There a 'Gold Standard' for Drug Detection in Pregnancy?

Author Affiliations

Department of Pediatrics University of Wisconsin 202 S Park St Madison, WI 53715

Am J Dis Child. 1992;146(1):13-14. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160130015009
Abstract

Sir.-Maynard and colleagues1 discuss a very timely and clinically important issue, ie, detection of drugs of abuse in pregnancy and in the newborn. Their study describes the use of meconium samples, which are easier to collect than urine and provide information about drugs that may have been used for at least several weeks prior to delivery. However, the authors state that "meconium testing predicted a positive urine test in 14 of 17 cases ... and predicted a negative urine test in 10 of 11 cases ..." They refer to these as the positive and negative predictive values of the test.

Positive predictive value is defined as the "probability of disease in a patient with a positive (abnormal) test result." Negative predictive value is defined as the "probability of not having the disease when the test result is negative (normal)."2 To determine whether the patient has the disease (ie, whether the baby has been

×