[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.3.44. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1993

The Diagnosis of Child Sexual Abuse-Reply

Author Affiliations

Department of Pediatrics University of Maryland School of Medicine 700 W Lombard St Baltimore, MD 21201

Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(2):130. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160260020009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—Brayden raises some interesting issues regarding the diagnosis of sexual abuse. However, it would be a minimalist role for pediatricians to only report the history and physical findings. Indeed, pediatricians (and others) need to interpret the information and make a (perhaps tentative) assessment of the likelihood of abuse to make a report to child protective services. This decision does need to be guided by state law. In addition, child protective services should be interested in the pediatrician's findings and assessment.

Few caseworkers, lawyers, or judges are in a position to interpret the physical findings. Although a final decision on the likelihood of abuse may be made by the public agencies, a comprehensive assessment and well-reasoned opinion facilitates this process. The distinction between a medical opinion and a diagnosis appears to be largely semantic. Clearly, if the diagnosis is uncertain, appropriate caution is warranted.

In addition to state reporting

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×