We appreciate the interest Roberts et al have shown in our article1 and we acknowledge their concerns. Their fine work in the areas of primary health care education and faculty development is well recognized and greatly respected by us. However, we must differ with their comment, "... the analysis of the data and conclusions of the study are misleading," in referring to our article.
The purpose of our study was to compare the continuity clinic experience of the pediatric residents at Baylor College of Medicine by practice setting and postgraduate level of training. We clearly stated in our article the study's limitations by design. The survey questions, aimed to measure the residents' reported experiences for patient volume, continuity of care, and type of patient visit, were formatted with the possible answers as categorical percentages. We reported this proportional data in accurate detail with no intent to "obscure the value of...
Rice TD, Drutz JE. Caveat Emptor? Caveat Lector (Reader Beware)!-Reply. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(9):960. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170460097023