[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
Odds of Preterm Birth and 95% CI Levels by Quartile of Average Phthalate Metabolite Level Measured During Pregnancy
Odds of Preterm Birth and 95% CI Levels by Quartile of Average Phthalate Metabolite Level Measured During Pregnancy

DEHP indicates di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; MBP, mono-n-butyl phthalate; MECPP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate; MEHP, mono-(2-ethyl)-hexyl phthalate.

Figure 2.
Odds of Spontaneous Preterm Birth and 95% CI Levels by Quartile of Average Phthalate Metabolite Level Measured During Pregnancy
Odds of Spontaneous Preterm Birth and 95% CI Levels by Quartile of Average Phthalate Metabolite Level Measured During Pregnancy

DEHP indicates di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; MBP, mono-n-butyl phthalate; MECPP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate; MEHP, mono-(2-ethyl)-hexyl phthalate.

Table 1.  
Distribution of Population Characteristics by Case Status
Distribution of Population Characteristics by Case Status
Table 2.  
Average Phthalate Levels Across Gestation in Overall Population and in Cases Compared With Control Participants
Average Phthalate Levels Across Gestation in Overall Population and in Cases Compared With Control Participants
Table 3.  
Odds Ratios From Fully Adjusted Logistic Models of Preterm Birth (<37 Weeks) and Spontaneous Preterm Birtha
Odds Ratios From Fully Adjusted Logistic Models of Preterm Birth (<37 Weeks) and Spontaneous Preterm Birtha
1.
Woodruff  TJ, Zota  AR, Schwartz  JM.  Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):878-885.PubMedArticle
2.
Adibi  JJ, Perera  FP, Jedrychowski  W,  et al.  Prenatal exposures to phthalates among women in New York City and Krakow, Poland. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(14):1719-1722.PubMedArticle
3.
Berman  T, Hochner-Celnikier  D, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Phthalate exposure among pregnant women in Jerusalem, Israel. Environ Int. 2009;35(2):353-357.PubMedArticle
4.
Irvin  EA, Calafat  AM, Silva  MJ,  et al.  An estimate of phthalate exposure among pregnant women living in Trujillo, Peru. Chemosphere. 2010;80(11):1301-1307.PubMedArticle
5.
Lin  S, Ku  HY, Su  PH,  et al.  Phthalate exposure in pregnant women and their children in central Taiwan. Chemosphere. 2011;82(7):947-955.PubMedArticle
6.
Cobellis  L, Latini  G, De Felice  C,  et al.  High plasma concentrations of di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(7):1512-1515.PubMedArticle
7.
Ferguson  KK, Loch-Caruso  R, Meeker  JD.  Exploration of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in relation to urinary phthalate metabolites: NHANES 1999-2006. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(1):477-485.PubMedArticle
8.
Huang  PC, Kuo  PL, Guo  YL, Liao  PC, Lee  CC.  Associations between urinary phthalate monoesters and thyroid hormones in pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2715-2722.PubMedArticle
9.
López-Carrillo  L, Hernández-Ramírez  RU, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Exposure to phthalates and breast cancer risk in northern Mexico. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(4):539-544.PubMedArticle
10.
Adibi  JJ, Hauser  R, Williams  PL,  et al.  Maternal urinary metabolites of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in relation to the timing of labor in a US multicenter pregnancy cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(8):1015-1024.PubMedArticle
11.
Meeker  JD, Hu  H, Cantonwine  DE,  et al.  Urinary phthalate metabolites in relation to preterm birth in Mexico city. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(10):1587-1592.PubMedArticle
12.
Suzuki  Y, Niwa  M, Yoshinaga  J, Mizumoto  Y, Serizawa  S, Shiraishi  H.  Prenatal exposure to phthalate esters and PAHs and birth outcomes. Environ Int. 2010;36(7):699-704.PubMedArticle
13.
Whyatt  RM, Adibi  JJ, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Prenatal di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate exposure and length of gestation among an inner-city cohort. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1213-e1220.PubMedArticle
14.
Wolff  MS, Engel  SM, Berkowitz  GS,  et al.  Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(8):1092-1097.PubMedArticle
15.
McElrath  TF, Hecht  JL, Dammann  O,  et al; ELGAN Study Investigators.  Pregnancy disorders that lead to delivery before the 28th week of gestation. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(9):980-989.PubMedArticle
16.
Silva  MJ, Samandar  E, Preau  JL  Jr, Reidy  JA, Needham  LL, Calafat  AM.  Quantification of 22 phthalate metabolites in human urine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007;860(1):106-112.PubMedArticle
17.
Hornung  RW, Reed  L.  Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5:46-51. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587.Article
18.
Latini  G, De Felice  C, Presta  G,  et al.  In utero exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and duration of human pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(14):1783-1785.PubMedArticle
19.
Adibi  JJ, Whyatt  RM, Williams  PL,  et al.  Characterization of phthalate exposure among pregnant women assessed by repeat air and urine samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(4):467-473.PubMed
20.
Latini  G, Del Vecchio  A, Massaro  M, Verrotti  A, DE Felice  C.  In utero exposure to phthalates and fetal development. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(21):2527-2534.PubMedArticle
21.
Chang  HH, Larson  J, Blencowe  H,  et al; Born Too Soon Preterm Prevention Analysis Group.  Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2012;381(9862):223-234.PubMedArticle
22.
Goldenberg  RL, Culhane  JF, Iams  JD, Romero  R.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75-84.PubMedArticle
23.
Rudel  RA, Gray  JM, Engel  CL,  et al.  Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(7):914-920.PubMedArticle
24.
Sathyanarayana  S, Alcedo  G, Saelens  BE,  et al.  Unexpected results in a randomized dietary trial to reduce phthalate and bisphenol A exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013;23(4):378-384.PubMedArticle
25.
Buckley  JP, Palmieri  RT, Matuszewski  JM,  et al.  Consumer product exposures associated with urinary phthalate levels in pregnant women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):468-475.PubMedArticle
26.
Romero-Franco  M, Hernández-Ramírez  RU, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Personal care product use and urinary levels of phthalate metabolites in Mexican women. Environ Int. 2011;37(5):867-871.PubMedArticle
27.
Martina  CA, Weiss  B, Swan  SH.  Lifestyle behaviors associated with exposures to endocrine disruptors. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(6):1427-1433.PubMedArticle
Original Investigation
January 2014

Environmental Phthalate Exposure and Preterm Birth

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
  • 2Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(1):61-68. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3699
Abstract

Importance  Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, with a variety of contributing causes and risk factors. Environmental exposures represent a group of understudied, but potentially important, factors. Phthalate diesters are used extensively in a variety of consumer products worldwide. Consequently, exposure in pregnant women is highly prevalent.

Objective  To assess the relationship between phthalate exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This nested case-control study was conducted at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Women were recruited for a prospective observational cohort study from 2006-2008. Each provided demographic data, biological samples, and information about birth outcomes. From within this group, we selected 130 cases of preterm birth and 352 randomly assigned control participants, and we analyzed urine samples from up to 3 time points during pregnancy for levels of phthalate metabolites.

Exposure  Phthalate exposure during pregnancy.

Main Outcomes and Measures  We examined associations between average levels of phthalate exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth, defined as fewer than 37 weeks of completed gestation, as well as spontaneous preterm birth, defined as preterm preceded by spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (n = 57).

Results  Geometric means of the di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) metabolites mono-(2-ethyl)-hexyl phthalate (MEHP) and mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP), as well as mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), were significantly higher in cases compared with control participants. In adjusted models, MEHP, MECPP, and Σ DEHP metabolites were associated with significantly increased odds of preterm birth. When spontaneous preterm births were examined alone, MEHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate, MECPP, Σ DEHP, MBP, and mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate metabolite levels were all associated with significantly elevated odds of prematurity.

Conclusions and Relevance  Women exposed to phthalates during pregnancy have significantly increased odds of delivering preterm. Steps should be taken to decrease maternal exposure to phthalates during pregnancy.

Prematurity is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and can lead to an array of adverse health effects in the lives of those who survive. The contribution of environmental exposures to preterm birth is understudied; however, identification of potential contributing factors offers significant hope for combating preterm birth for several reasons: (1) pregnant women are unintentionally exposed to many chemicals throughout gestation, some of which have demonstrated reproductive toxicities1; (2) increased exposure to some chemicals over past decades correlates strongly with increased rates of preterm birth, which may be the result of various confounders but may also indicate a real association; and (3) exposure to environmental contaminants may be largely modifiable, opportune for interventions at the individual, clinical, and population levels.

Phthalates are a class of chemicals used in innumerable products worldwide, and exposure in humans and, more specifically, pregnant women is ubiquitous in many countries.25 Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) exposure occurs primarily from the consumption of contaminated food and water, while exposure to other phthalates, including benzylbutyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, and diethyl phthalate, occurs commonly through contact with personal care products such as lotions, perfumes, and deodorants. Exposure in women has been linked to disrupted thyroid hormone levels, increased systemic levels of oxidative stress and inflammation, and adverse health end points such as endometriosis and breast cancer.69 Previous epidemiologic studies of the relationship between phthalate exposure and gestation length or preterm birth have been limited by sample size and exposure assessment methods, and results have been suggestive but not fully conclusive.1014 The present study used a powerful nested case-control design to assess the relationship between gestational phthalate exposure and preterm birth.

Additionally, we took advantage of the large number of cases in our study to investigate the link between phthalate exposure and spontaneous preterm birth. Delineating preterm births by obstetric presentation may help to elucidate specific mechanistic pathways.15 Previously, McElrath and colleagues15 hypothesized that preterm births resulting from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM) are likely the consequences of intrauterine inflammation, whereas medically indicated preterm births, typically subsequent to preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction, may result from aberrant placentation. Toxicological studies suggest a role for phthalates in the inflammatory cascade leading up to preterm parturition. Hence, we additionally examined in this study the effects of phthalates on preterm birth in mothers who experienced spontaneous preterm birth.

Methods

From 2006-2008, women from the Boston area who planned to deliver at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital were recruited for participation in a large prospective cohort study designed to identify predictors of preeclampsia. In the first trimester (median 10 weeks’ gestation), participants completed demographic questionnaires providing information on race/ethnicity and tobacco and alcohol use, among other factors, as well as supplied urine and blood samples for biomarker analysis. First-trimester ultrasonography was used to validate and establish gestational age. During the 3 subsequent study visits, additional biological samples were collected in tandem with clinically relevant pregnancy characteristics. Delivery complications and neonate anthropomorphic measurements were recorded at birth. All specimens were stored at −80°C. In 2011, we selected from this population the 130 mothers who delivered prior to 37 weeks’ gestation and 352 randomly selected mothers who delivered at or after 37 weeks. Multiple births were excluded from our study. Within the group of mothers who delivered preterm, we also examined a subset who delivered with clinical presentation by either spontaneous preterm labor and/or pPROM (n = 57). These were considered spontaneous preterm births for our analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from participants, and the institutional review boards of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the University of Michigan approved this study.

Urinary Phthalate Metabolites

Urine samples were collected from up to 4 visits per participant during pregnancy. For visit 1 (median = 9.71 weeks’ gestation), 479 samples were available (n = 129 for cases, n = 350 for control participants). For visit 2 (median = 17.9 weeks’ gestation), 422 samples were available (n = 118 for cases, n = 304 for control participants). For visit 3 (median = 26.0 weeks’ gestation), 412 samples were available (n = 111 for cases, n = 301 for control participants). For visit 4 (median = 35.1 weeks’ gestation), 380 samples were available (n = 66 for cases, n = 314 for control participants). By the time of visit 4, many cases had already delivered, causing a disproportionately small number of samples for cases at that visit. Hence, levels measured in visit 4 samples were excluded for this analysis.

Nine phthalate metabolites were measured in each urine sample by NSF International using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention method described elsewhere.16 Briefly, this entails enzymatic deconjugation of glucuronidated metabolites, solid-phase extraction, separation via high-performance liquid chromatography, and detection by tandem mass spectrometry. Levels below the limit of detection were kept as is if a numerical value was reported and otherwise were replaced with the limit of detection divided by the square root of 2.17 Because concentration can vary with urine dilution, levels were corrected for urinary specific gravity (SG) using the following formula: Pc = P[(1.015 – 1)]/(SG – 1)], where Pc represents the SG-corrected phthalate concentration (micrograms per liter), P represents the measured concentration in urine, 1.015 is the median SG of all samples measured, and SG represents the SG of the individual sample.11 Both unadjusted and adjusted metabolite levels were log-normally distributed and were natural-log (LN) transformed for statistical analysis.

Phthalate metabolite levels may fluctuate over time because their half-lives are short and sources of exposure are variable. Hence, we used the geometric mean of levels from visits 1 to 3 to estimate each woman’s average exposure throughout pregnancy. In addition to examining associations with individual phthalate metabolite averages, we also examined the average of molar sums of DEHP metabolites (Σ DEHP, nanomoles per milliliter) for each woman across pregnancy.

Statistical Analysis

Population characteristics were tabulated for demographic and pregnancy-related variables of interest, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, health insurance provider, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) measured at the first study visit, smoking status, alcohol use, parity, use of assisted-reproductive technology, and sex of the infant. Each of these was considered a potential covariate for multivariate logistic regression models.

Urinary phthalate metabolite distributions were examined for all participants combined and by case status. Differences in phthalate concentrations in preterm cases compared with control participants were investigated with t tests of LN-transformed and SG-corrected phthalate metabolite means. Next, using multivariate logistic regression, we examined the odds of preterm birth in association with phthalate metabolite concentrations in crude models adjusting for urinary SG only and in full models, adjusting for a priori covariates including maternal age, race/ethnicity, and education level (an indicator of socioeconomic status). Additional covariates were added to models in a forward stepwise procedure and were finally included if they altered the association between phthalate metabolite and preterm birth by greater than 10%. Similar regression models were created examining the subset of preterm births with clinical presentation of preterm labor or pPROM to explore relationships within spontaneous preterm births.

To examine the effects of exposure at higher levels, and the potential for nonlinear relationships, we divided average phthalate metabolite concentrations into quartiles using nonstandardized values from the entire population. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for each of the top 3 quartiles in comparison with the lowest quartile of exposure in models adjusting for the same sets of covariates used in models with continuous exposure. Tests for trend were conducted by modeling quartiles as a single ordinal variable, again using the same covariates. Quartile analysis and tests for trend were performed for the subset of spontaneous preterm births as well. All analysis was performed using R version 2.13.1.

Results

Distributions of categorical covariates are presented in Table 1 for the population overall and by preterm status. Overall, the women enrolled in this study were predominantly white, well-educated nonsmokers. Few consumed alcohol during pregnancy and nearly half were nulliparous. Approximately 10% of the population used assisted-reproductive technology and 44% of infants were male, and proportions of these variables were equal among cases and control participants. Consistent with previous US studies, elevated levels of mono-benzyl phthalate, mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), mono-isobutyl phthalate, and mono-ethyl phthalate were observed in African American compared with white mothers (data not shown).

Each phthalate metabolite was detected in at least 95% of urine samples. As expected, distributions were log-normally distributed and levels were LN transformed for statistical analysis. Spearman correlation coefficients between average phthalate levels in the overall population were modest to strong (eTable 1 in the Supplement). Geometric means and 25th and 75th percentiles of SG-adjusted exposures overall and in cases and control participants separately are presented in Table 2. Significantly elevated levels of mono-(2-ethyl)-hexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP), Σ DEHP, and MBP were observed in preterm cases compared with control participants (P < .05). Suggestively elevated levels of mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) were also noted (P < .10).

Stepwise addition to incorporate covariates into logistic regression models demonstrated 2 sets of covariates. Full models for DEHP metabolites included SG, age, race/ethnicity, and education level as covariates. For other metabolites, health insurance provider was also included in full models because addition of this variable altered effect estimates by greater than 10%. Odds ratios and 95% CIs are presented in Table 3. We observed significantly elevated odds of preterm birth with LN-unit increases in MEHP, MECPP, and Σ DEHP, and suggestively elevated odds for MBP. Interestingly, odds ratios for all associations were greater in magnitude for the subset of spontaneous preterm births and were statistically significant despite the much smaller sample size. Results were similar in crude models, adjusting only for urinary SG (eTable 2 in the Supplement).

Assessment of urinary phthalate metabolite quartiles showed dose-related relationships with odds of preterm birth. Significant positive trends were observed for MEHP, MECPP, Σ DEHP, and MBP (Figure 1). When quartiles of exposure were examined within spontaneous preterm births alone, trends became stronger for all phthalate metabolites, and odds ratios associated with the top quartile of exposure were markedly increased (Figure 2).

Discussion

Our results demonstrate a robust increase in the odds of preterm birth in association with urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations during pregnancy. Specifically, maternal levels of DEHP metabolites, including MEHP (the putative toxic metabolite of DEHP), MECPP (the most stable marker of DEHP exposure), and summed DEHP metabolites, showed the strongest and most clearly dose-dependent relationships with odds of birth before 37 weeks’ gestation. Additional suggestive relationships were observed for MBP. When spontaneous preterm births (ie, those with clinical presentation of spontaneous preterm labor or pPROM) were examined alone, odds ratios became greater for all phthalate metabolites, and significant relationships emerged for mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate, mono-benzyl phthalate, MBP, and MCPP.

Associations observed in the present study are consistent with results from previous studies of preterm birth or gestation length. Early prospective cohort studies found that exposure to DEHP metabolites was associated with decreased gestational age at delivery.13,18 Latini and colleagues reported that infants who had detectable levels of MEHP in cord blood had significantly shorter gestational length compared with those who did not (N = 84, preterm = 11).18 In another study where metabolites were measured in third-trimester maternal urine, gestational age similarly decreased with increasing DEHP metabolite exposure (N = 311, preterm = 10).13 More recently, a small nested case-control study in Mexico City revealed significantly increased odds of preterm birth in association with third-trimester levels of MECPP, MBP, and MCPP in models adjusted for urinary SG and maternal factors (N = 60, preterm = 30).11

However, other authors have reported contrary or null results. Adibi and colleagues10 found that the odds of preterm birth were decreased with increasing exposure to the DEHP metabolites MEHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate, and mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate measured in maternal urine during the third trimester (N = 283, preterm = 14). Likewise, a 2008 study noted a positive association between third-trimester low-molecular-weight phthalate (eg, mono-ethyl phthalate) exposure and gestational age at delivery (N = 404).14 Finally, in a study of women in Tokyo, Japan, Suzuki and colleagues12 were unable to detect an association between gestational length and any of 9 urinary phthalate metabolites taken at any time between the 9th and 40th weeks of gestation (N = 149, preterm = 2).

Limitations in previous studies of phthalate exposure and prematurity potentially account for the differences in these findings and highlight the advantages in our analysis. First, exposure assessment in prior studies used a single-spot urine phthalate metabolite concentration from the third trimester. This is problematic because a single measurement, particularly late in pregnancy, is only loosely correlated with long-term exposure.19 Second, prior work used self-recalled and reported dates of last menstrual period to calculate gestational age at delivery. Finally, sample size, either overall or in proportion of preterm births, lacked power to detect real associations. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to use multiple urine samples collected longitudinally across gestation to more accurately integrate overall exposure. Additionally, the present work used clinically and first-trimester ultrasonography–validated gestational dates. These aspects greatly reduced the potential for exposure and outcome misclassification. This power was heightened by the case-control design and large sample size. Lastly, the sample size in the present study afforded more than adequate power.

We further leveraged the parent cohort study’s strengths by examining the relationship between gestational phthalate exposure and spontaneous preterm birth. Relationships within this subset have not been previously explored, likely because of already limited numbers of preterm births in earlier studies. However, the results from this analysis both strengthened the overall findings and highlighted a potential mechanism for the connection between phthalate exposure and prematurity. As mentioned previously, McElrath and colleagues suggested that spontaneous preterm birth is associated with intrauterine inflammation. The strong link observed between phthalate exposure and spontaneous preterm births found in the present study suggests phthalate exposure is associated with increased intrauterine inflammation. This is consistent with both in vitro data that have demonstrated the pro-inflammatory activity of phthalates, and limited cross-sectional human studies, which have shown that phthalate exposure is associated with increased systemic markers of inflammation.7,20

Reducing rates of preterm birth is unlikely to occur by identification of 1 or 2 obvious causes; rather, detailed investigation of many component contributors is necessary. A recent study predicted that current interventions to prevent preterm birth will decrease rates by only 5% or less by 2015, making identification of preventable exposures crucial.21 In our study, women with average gestational MEHP exposure in the top quartile had 4 times the odds of preterm birth compared with women in the bottom quartile. Because more than two-thirds of preterm births every year are spontaneous, the subset of the population susceptible to these effects may be quite large.22

Also, importantly, phthalate exposure may be preventable with behavioral modification. A recent dietary intervention study demonstrated that when participants altered their diets to consume only fresh foods that were not packaged in cans or plastic, urinary levels of DEHP metabolites decreased markedly.23 However, another recent study with a similar dietary intervention did not observe the same effects.24 Low-molecular-weight phthalates, including dibutyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate, are used frequently as solvents in cosmetic products such as fragrances, hair spray, nail polish, deodorants, and body lotions. Women who refrain from using such products may have lower levels of exposure.2527

While we cannot rule out the role of unmeasured confounders in our study (eg, dietary patterns that may be associated with both phthalate exposure and preterm birth), we did examine the potential for confounding among known predictors of preterm birth in our analysis. Another potential limitation in our study may have been the measurement of phthalate metabolites in excreted urine. Although this is the best method to measure cumulative exposure to phthalates to date, differences in individual metabolism and excretion patterns may affect urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations. However, these individual patterns would likely contribute nondifferential measurement error, which would shift measured associations toward the null.

Our results indicate a significant association between exposure to phthalates during pregnancy and preterm birth, which solidifies prior laboratory and epidemiologic evidence. Furthermore, as exposure to phthalates is widespread and because the prevalence of preterm birth among women in our study cohort was similar to that in the general population, our results are generalizable to women in the United States and elsewhere. These data provide strong support for taking action in the prevention or reduction of phthalate exposure during pregnancy.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: John D. Meeker, ScD, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 S Observatory St, M6017 SPH II, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (meekerj@umich.edu).

Published Online: November 18, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3699.

Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: McElrath, Meeker.

Acquisition of data: McElrath, Meeker.

Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: All authors.

Obtained funding: Meeker.

Administrative, technical, or material support: McElrath, Meeker.

Study supervision: McElrath, Meeker.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (grants R01ES018872, P42ES017198, and P30ES017885).

Role of the Sponsor: The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: We thank Kurtis Kneen, PhD, Scott Clipper, PhD, Gerry Pace, BS, David Weller, BS, and Jennifer Bell, BS, of NSF International in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for urine phthalate analysis, and Russ Hauser, MD, ScD, of the Harvard School of Public Health for guidance on study design.

Correction: This article was corrected online March 18, 2014, for an error in a phthalate metabolite description.

References
1.
Woodruff  TJ, Zota  AR, Schwartz  JM.  Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):878-885.PubMedArticle
2.
Adibi  JJ, Perera  FP, Jedrychowski  W,  et al.  Prenatal exposures to phthalates among women in New York City and Krakow, Poland. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(14):1719-1722.PubMedArticle
3.
Berman  T, Hochner-Celnikier  D, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Phthalate exposure among pregnant women in Jerusalem, Israel. Environ Int. 2009;35(2):353-357.PubMedArticle
4.
Irvin  EA, Calafat  AM, Silva  MJ,  et al.  An estimate of phthalate exposure among pregnant women living in Trujillo, Peru. Chemosphere. 2010;80(11):1301-1307.PubMedArticle
5.
Lin  S, Ku  HY, Su  PH,  et al.  Phthalate exposure in pregnant women and their children in central Taiwan. Chemosphere. 2011;82(7):947-955.PubMedArticle
6.
Cobellis  L, Latini  G, De Felice  C,  et al.  High plasma concentrations of di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(7):1512-1515.PubMedArticle
7.
Ferguson  KK, Loch-Caruso  R, Meeker  JD.  Exploration of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in relation to urinary phthalate metabolites: NHANES 1999-2006. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(1):477-485.PubMedArticle
8.
Huang  PC, Kuo  PL, Guo  YL, Liao  PC, Lee  CC.  Associations between urinary phthalate monoesters and thyroid hormones in pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2715-2722.PubMedArticle
9.
López-Carrillo  L, Hernández-Ramírez  RU, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Exposure to phthalates and breast cancer risk in northern Mexico. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(4):539-544.PubMedArticle
10.
Adibi  JJ, Hauser  R, Williams  PL,  et al.  Maternal urinary metabolites of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in relation to the timing of labor in a US multicenter pregnancy cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(8):1015-1024.PubMedArticle
11.
Meeker  JD, Hu  H, Cantonwine  DE,  et al.  Urinary phthalate metabolites in relation to preterm birth in Mexico city. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(10):1587-1592.PubMedArticle
12.
Suzuki  Y, Niwa  M, Yoshinaga  J, Mizumoto  Y, Serizawa  S, Shiraishi  H.  Prenatal exposure to phthalate esters and PAHs and birth outcomes. Environ Int. 2010;36(7):699-704.PubMedArticle
13.
Whyatt  RM, Adibi  JJ, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Prenatal di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate exposure and length of gestation among an inner-city cohort. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1213-e1220.PubMedArticle
14.
Wolff  MS, Engel  SM, Berkowitz  GS,  et al.  Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(8):1092-1097.PubMedArticle
15.
McElrath  TF, Hecht  JL, Dammann  O,  et al; ELGAN Study Investigators.  Pregnancy disorders that lead to delivery before the 28th week of gestation. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(9):980-989.PubMedArticle
16.
Silva  MJ, Samandar  E, Preau  JL  Jr, Reidy  JA, Needham  LL, Calafat  AM.  Quantification of 22 phthalate metabolites in human urine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007;860(1):106-112.PubMedArticle
17.
Hornung  RW, Reed  L.  Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5:46-51. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587.Article
18.
Latini  G, De Felice  C, Presta  G,  et al.  In utero exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and duration of human pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(14):1783-1785.PubMedArticle
19.
Adibi  JJ, Whyatt  RM, Williams  PL,  et al.  Characterization of phthalate exposure among pregnant women assessed by repeat air and urine samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(4):467-473.PubMed
20.
Latini  G, Del Vecchio  A, Massaro  M, Verrotti  A, DE Felice  C.  In utero exposure to phthalates and fetal development. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(21):2527-2534.PubMedArticle
21.
Chang  HH, Larson  J, Blencowe  H,  et al; Born Too Soon Preterm Prevention Analysis Group.  Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2012;381(9862):223-234.PubMedArticle
22.
Goldenberg  RL, Culhane  JF, Iams  JD, Romero  R.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75-84.PubMedArticle
23.
Rudel  RA, Gray  JM, Engel  CL,  et al.  Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(7):914-920.PubMedArticle
24.
Sathyanarayana  S, Alcedo  G, Saelens  BE,  et al.  Unexpected results in a randomized dietary trial to reduce phthalate and bisphenol A exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013;23(4):378-384.PubMedArticle
25.
Buckley  JP, Palmieri  RT, Matuszewski  JM,  et al.  Consumer product exposures associated with urinary phthalate levels in pregnant women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):468-475.PubMedArticle
26.
Romero-Franco  M, Hernández-Ramírez  RU, Calafat  AM,  et al.  Personal care product use and urinary levels of phthalate metabolites in Mexican women. Environ Int. 2011;37(5):867-871.PubMedArticle
27.
Martina  CA, Weiss  B, Swan  SH.  Lifestyle behaviors associated with exposures to endocrine disruptors. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(6):1427-1433.PubMedArticle
×