[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
October 2002

Effect of Compliance With Health Supervision Guidelines Among US Infants on Emergency Department Visits

Author Affiliations

From the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Md (Drs Hakim and Ronsaville); and KEVRIC Company, Inc, Baltimore (Dr Ronsaville). Dr Ronsaville is now with the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(10):1015-1020. doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.10.1015

Background  There are few studies that demonstrate the health benefit of compliance with early periodic health supervision.

Objective  To examine the association between emergency department (ED) use and compliance with prevailing guidelines for periodic health supervision for conditions that potentially could be avoided among a national cohort of US children.

Design  This was a historic cohort study that combined maternal and primary care physician reports of the use of preventive care services for infants during the first 7 months of life from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and its 1991 Longitudinal Follow-up study. A preventive care scale used in Cox proportional hazards survival regression predicted the time to the first ED visit for selected diagnoses and all-cause visits controlling for illness severity.

Results  Among children with incomplete well-child care in the first 6 months of life, there was an increased risk of having an ED visit for an upper respiratory tract infection (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-3.2), gastroenteritis (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0), asthma (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.3), and all-cause ED visits (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.98).

Conclusions  Because of the positive effect compliance with national guidelines for early well-child care has on lowering the risk of experiencing ED use, national efforts to improve the quality of child health services for young children should focus on increasing compliance with periodic preventive care for young children.

THE SCHEDULE of early pediatric well-child care visits was designed to accommodate the immunization schedule, monitor early development, and provide guidance and counseling to parents about child care.15 Other than the proven effectiveness of immunizations, efforts to show a direct health benefit to the schedule of well-child care visits have largely been unsuccessful.6 The conviction that these visits are themselves beneficial is reinforced by research that has correlated poor access to ambulatory services among low-income children with more severe childhood illnesses,7 higher avoidable hospitalizations rates,8,9 and more frequent use of the emergency department (ED).10 Because of this lack of evidence, we embarked on a study to examine the relationship of compliance with the schedule of visits recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics on ED visits.

In an earlier analysis of Medicaid claims data, we found that compliance with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended series of well-child care visits during the first 2 years of life among a large cohort of children enrolled in Medicaid from birth was related to fewer avoidable hospitalizations.11 Only limited information is available in the Medicaid claims about ED visits. To examine the relation between compliance and ED visits, we used longitudinal data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) and its 1991 Longitudinal Follow up (LF).


The NMIHS is a representative sample of live births and late fetal and infant deaths that occurred in the United States in 1988.12 The purpose of the survey was to examine factors related to poor pregnancy outcomes. The infants were sampled by birth weight (<1500 g, 1500-2499 g, and >2499 g) and race (African American and all others) strata, oversampling low-birth-weight and African American children. Seven months after the infants were born, the mothers were interviewed about health habits, socioeconomic characteristics, use of health care services, and the child's health and medical care up until that time. Of the 13 417 mothers selected for the live birth survey, 9953 (74%) responded. The mothers were asked extensive questions about their pregnancy and pregnancy history, behavioral risk factors, prenatal care, infant feeding, socioeconomic level, and use of pediatric health care services.

The 1991 LF interviewed the mothers of the live born infants from the 1988 NMIHS to obtain longitudinal data on child development, effects of low-birth-weight, child care, and pediatric health care services use since the earlier survey. It resurveyed 8285 (88%) of the mothers interviewed in the 1988 NMIHS when the surviving children were 3 years old.13,14 When merged, 1991 LF and the 1988 NMIHS data provided a rich longitudinal database for our analysis of the relationship of ED visits and compliance with recommended well-child care visits. Mothers were asked to provide the names of all medical providers and hospitals where the child's condition was diagnosed, treated, and/or where the child was admitted. Each health care provider was asked to supply information about the type of service provided and diagnosis for each visit and/or hospitalization. Specific information about ED visits came from the hospitals that responded to the survey. Responses were received from 6606 primary care physicians (73% of those contacted) and 3183 hospitals (89% of those contacted). The 1991 LF sample was then reweighted to be representative of all children aged 3 years in the United States. Emergency department visits were ascertained from the hospitals that responded to the 1991 LF.


The goal of the analysis was to examine the effect of compliance with accepted guidelines for well-child care on use of emergency services adjusting for elements that could also be related to use of the ED. To do this, we created a variable to represent compliance with the 1988 American Academy of Pediatrics schedule of well-child care visits and immunizations during the first 7 months of an infant's life, which was the period about which mothers were asked to recall their child's physician visits and immunizations during the 1988 NMIHS. In that year, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended 4 well-child care visits for that age group (1 soon after birth, then every 2 months thereafter) and 5 immunizations (3 diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccines and 2 oral polio vaccines).15 To improve the responses of the mothers during the 1988 NMIHS, we combined the information provided by the mothers during the earlier survey with that supplied by the health care providers from the 1991 LF. We restricted the health care provider information to the first 7 months of the child's life, which was the period reported on by the mothers.

We classified sick visits during which an immunization or screening was given as well-care visits to capture opportunistic well care. The 1988 NMIHS contained the month but not day of birth to protect respondent confidentiality, limiting our ability to determine the exact timing of child well-care visits in relation to the date of birth. Instead, we arbitrarily assigned age to be the 15th day of the birth month. Because we did not know the date of the first well-child care visit relative to the child's age, we set a lenient deadline of 2 months for the first visit to occur and required only 3 total visits in 7 months instead of the recommended 4 for an child to be categorized as having complete well-child care visits. We totaled maternal and primary care physician counts of child well-care visits and immunizations separately, using the greater of the 2 to determine the number of visits and immunizations during the first 7 months of the child's life. We excluded cases with no information from either source. A thorough explanation of the combination of these 2 sources is given in a previous article.16

We categorized the variable that indicated compliance into 3 levels based on the relative completeness of well-child care visits and immunizations. Compliance was complete if there were maternal or primary care physician reports of 3 or more well-child care visits with the first occurring by age 2 months, with the requisite number of immunizations (3 diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccines and 2 oral polio vaccines) by age 7 months. The intermediate level, which we termed "adequate," was defined as 3 or more well-child care visits that began by age 2 months but with fewer than the above-mentioned immunizations. This situation suggested that while well-child care visits appeared up-to-date, there were missed opportunities to immunize the child. Inadequate compliance was no well-child care visit in the first 2 months or fewer than 3 visits by age 7 months, regardless of the number of immunizations, implying that there were barriers to accessing preventive care visits that could potentially affect the child's health.


Previous studies have used the concept of avoidable hospitalizations as an indication of adequate well-child care.9,17 The concept of having an avoidable ED visit has not been used as an indicator of quality pediatric preventive care, to our knowledge, with the exception of a study that found that a higher level of ED use to be related to poor continuity of care.18 Because of this, we hypothesized that ED use would be related to compliance with well-child care visits. We selected 3 diagnoses from those commonly used to indicate a hospital admission is potentially avoidable and that would be common reasons for visiting an ED: upper respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis, and asthma.9 We also examined the effect of compliance with early well-child care on ED visits for all diagnoses.

To maintain a temporal chain of events, we defined our outcome to be an ED visit that occurred after the first 7 months of each child's life, which was the period about which we had maternal information about well-child care. Emergency department visits that occurred before the age of 7 months were excluded from the analysis.


We used SUDAAN statistical software for the analysis to consider the sampling framework when computing national estimates and SEs in regression models.19 Survival time in days until the first ED visit after the seventh month of life was the outcome variable in a Cox proportional hazards model for acute upper respiratory tract disease and for all-cause ED visits. The major independent variable was the level of well-child care compliance in the first 7 months of life. To account for general health, we counted the number of ambulatory visits for sick care using the maximum number of sick care visits reported by the mother or primary care physician and categorized them into 3 levels (≤1, 2-6, and ≥7). We computed separate Cox proportional hazards models for upper respiratory tract infections, gastroenteritis, asthma, and all diagnoses.

We tested many potential variables that have been found to be related to use of infant services by other researchers including maternal depression, number of children in the family, use of prenatal care,20 whether the mother wanted the pregnancy, alcohol consumption, where the infant's care was obtained, race, marital status, parental educational level, maternal age, number of children in the household, and household income. We also adjusted for maternal smoking and infant's birth weight.


Beginning with the sample of 8285 mothers who responded to both the 1988 NMIHS and the 1991 LF, we excluded 241 (2.9%) who were not white, African American, or Hispanic, leaving a total of 7904 mothers. We excluded 609 respondents (7.3%) who did not name a health care provider or refused permission to contact their health care providers. Since hospitals were the only source of information about ED visits, we excluded 1250 cases (15.1%) that either did not name a hospital or for whom the hospital did not respond to the survey, leaving a sample of 6045 cases.

The characteristics of the analytic sample differed somewhat from the subsample not selected for analysis (Table 1). The mothers in the analytic sample were more likely to be white (72.7% vs 62.1%) and less likely to be Hispanic (11.1% vs 15.5%). They were more likely to be married (71.4% vs 68.7%), less likely to have a household income less than the federal poverty level (28.7% vs 33.3%), and more likely to be privately insured (52.8% vs 49.5%).

Table 1. 
Characteristics of Children Selected or Not Selected for Analysis of the Effect of Well-Child Care on Emergency Room Visits*
Characteristics of Children Selected or Not Selected for Analysis of the Effect of Well-Child Care on Emergency Room Visits*

More than half (55.5%) the children in the sample experienced complete early well-child care visits (≥3 well-child care visits, the first occurring by age 2 months, and 3 diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccines and 2 oral polio vaccines) by age 6 months; 26.7% had adequate well-child care visits (3 well-child care visits and <5 immunizations) and 17.8% of the children had inadequate early well-child care visits (no well-child care visit in the first 2 months or <3 well-child care visits by age 7 months) (Table 2). Approximately 30% of the children had 0 or 1 sick visit by age 7 months, and 53.6% had 2 to 6 sick visits during that time. Infants with a birth weight less that 1500 g (n = 864) had a different pattern of compliance: 36.6% had complete compliance, 38.2% had adequate compliance, and 25.2% had incomplete compliance. For this reason we conducted separate analyses for the infants who weighted less than 1500 g and those who weighted 1500 g and more.

Table 2. 
Level of Compliance With the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Well-Child Care Visits and the Number of Sick Visits During the First 6 Months of Life*
Level of Compliance With the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Well-Child Care Visits and the Number of Sick Visits During the First 6 Months of Life*

Emergency department visits were common among children between the ages of 7 months and 3 years (Table 3). Emergency department visits were even more common for children born with a birth weight less than 1500 g. Rates of ED visits for upper respiratory tract infection, asthma, and all-causes diagnoses were associated with level of well-child care compliance, increasing as compliance became poorer. For example, those children with a birth weight of 1500 g or more with complete well-child care compliance had 40.0 of 1000 ED visits for upper respiratory tract infection compared with 87.0 of 1000 among those with an inadequate level of compliance. The rate of ED visits for asthma among the larger-birth-weight infants rose from 6.4 per 1000 among those with complete care to 13 per 1000 for those with inadequate care. The very low-birth-weight children with inadequate compliance experienced 551.7 per 1000 ED visits for any diagnosis compared with 339 per 1000 among those with complete care and 76.5 per 1000 ED visits for asthma among those with inadequate care compared with 36.0 of 1000 among those with complete compliance. For ED visits for gastroenteritis, the pattern was less clear. Among infants weighting more than 1500 g at birth, ED visits rose from 17.5 per 1000 for those with complete well-child care to 30.5 per 1000 and 30 per 1000 for those with adequate and inadequate well-child care.

Table 3. 
Incidence Rates of Having an Emergency Department Visit for Selected Conditions Between the Ages of 6 Months and 3 Years by Well-Child Care in the First 6 Months*
Incidence Rates of Having an Emergency Department Visit for Selected Conditions Between the Ages of 6 Months and 3 Years by Well-Child Care in the First 6 Months*

The results of the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed a 60% increase in risk of experiencing an ED visit for any reason among the sample of children who weighed 1500 g (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.9) when early well-child care was inadequate compared with those with complete early well-child care after adjustment for sick visits (Table 4). Similarly, the children with inadequate well-child care had a 40% increase in risk of having an ED visit (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6). This relationship between ED visits and the level of well-child care compliance was similar for visits for upper respiratory tract infections, gastroenteritis, and asthma, with an approximate doubling in risk (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.2; HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; and HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3, respectively). With the exception of gastroenteritis, a similar pattern of an approximate doubling of risk of experiencing an ED visit for any reason or for upper respiratory tract infections or asthma was seen among the very low-birth-weight children. Sick visits were related to ED visits among the children with a birth weight greater than 1500 g, a relationship that was less clear among the very low-birth-weight children.

Table 4. 
Results of Cox Regression for Risk of an Emergency Department Visit Between the Ages of 6 Months and 3 Years for Infants With a Birth Weight ≥1500 g*
Results of Cox Regression for Risk of an Emergency Department Visit Between the Ages of 6 Months and 3 Years for Infants With a Birth Weight ≥1500 g*

A second regression model that adjusted for race, marital status, parental education, maternal age, number of children in the household, use of prenatal care, maternal depression score, maternal smoking, whether the pregnancy was wanted, household income, insurance, and birth weight in grams did not change the relationship between well-child care compliance and ED visits. In this model (not shown), there were few consistent relationship associations between any of the variables and ED visits except for insurance status. Receiving Medicaid was associated with a 60% increase in likelihood of having any ED visit for children weighing more than 1500 g at birth (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and a 30% increase among the very low-birth-weight children (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6).


Since well-child care became institutionalized, pediatric policy-makers have hypothesized that comprehensive primary care consisting of examination, immunization, monitoring of growth and development, and anticipatory guidance and counseling of parents reduces childhood morbidity and mortality. Indirect evidence suggests that this is so. For example, during the first full decade of Medicaid (1970-1980), which was associated with increased use of health services, infant mortality dropped 35%, the most rapid decline of the century. In addition, deaths in early childhood (ages 1-4 years) declined 24%; for school-aged children (5-14 years), 26%; and for older adolescents and young adults, 25%.21 Research shows that poor children are less likely to use preventive services and that among poor children there is a greater likelihood that they will use ED services for conditions that could be treated in a physician's office.22,23 The results of this and other studies suggest that children in the United States are underusing preventive care services.11,16 But, there has been little direct evidence of a link between the level of compliance with well-child care and ED visits.

Researchers have used the concept of avoidable hospitalizations and nonurgent ED visits to measure access to and the quality of primary care.9,24 The class of hospitalizations considered by researchers to be potentially avoidable has been found to be associated with indicators of poverty, such as minority status and low educational level.8 Similarly, ED visits for nonurgent reasons have been found to be associated with the same factors.10,25,26 A recent study found that among Medicaid-covered children, compliance with recommended guidelines for well-child care was related to as much as a 50% decrease in avoidable hospitalizations.11 Another study of the relationship between continuity of care and ED use found that with poor continuity of care there was more than a 50% increase in the risk of an ED visit.18 Several studies have found an association between more frequent primary care visits and fewer ED visits.10,18,27 However, using ED use as a health outcome indicator is nonspecific—it includes many visits that are unavoidable, such as acute illness that occurs after hours. The time of the ED visit was unavailable to us.

Use of health care services is a multidimensional phenomenon. Individual circumstances; family dynamics; social, cultural, political, and economic factors; health care provider characteristics; and the characteristics of health care systems may affect health care behaviors that might improve use of pediatric child health care.6,2839 Because the 1988 NMIHS and its 1991 LF conducted a comprehensive survey that included a large number of questions, a long list of potential risk factors were tested in our regression models as independent risk factors for ED visits. These included indicators of social status (marital status, income, and educational level), family dynamics (whether the index pregnancy was wanted, number of children, and birth order), health care access (prenatal care attendance and usual source of care), and other indicators (ie, depression score, use of alcohol, and others). None of these was consistently associated with the dependent variables (with the exception of insurance status) suggesting that the notion of compliance with well-child care and fewer ED visits is independent of race, socioeconomic indicators, and other variables thought to be causally associated with use of ED services.

A limitation of this study is that more than one quarter of the original sample was eliminated because of incomplete survey information. Because the excluded sample was more frequently of those in a lower socioeconomic level, the analytic sample had a higher level of complete compliance compared with the full sample analyzed in our previous study (55.5% vs 51.7%).16 Had we had ED visit information on the whole sample, the incidence rates given in Table 3 may have been higher. However, because our results remained robust after adjustment for socioeconomic factors, they are generalizable to all US children.

Other limitations of this study include the potential for incomplete or inaccurate data from the health care providers, discrepancies between maternal and health care provider reports, or problems with maternal recall of use of services. The fact that neither the maternal nor the health care provider reports were complete suggests that our estimates of health services use may have been low because of underreporting. Conversely, the estimated rates of early well-child care may be inflated because mothers excluded from the study were disproportionately from high-risk groups. Although mothers reported more early well-child care than did their health care providers, the health care providers reported more sick visits than mothers, suggesting that visits mothers considered to be for well-child care may have been recorded as sick visits by physicians. Counting well-child care visits and immunizations is only a proxy for the concept of complete preventive care and does not provide a measure of the quality of that care. However, with the exception of immunizations, no study has yet found that any particular component of the well-child care visit is effective.6 The results of this analysis suggest that it is the act of compliance with a scheduled series of primary care encounters that is related to the outcome. We speculate that once continuity is established between the mother and physician, a mutually trusting relationship forms that facilitates treatment.

Despite these limitations, the results of our study strongly suggest that compliance with guidelines for care may establish a physician-family relationship that may prevent the use of ED for nonurgent care. This suggests that children with poor compliance should be targeted for intervention. Moreover, children without adequate health coverage should by assured of adequate pediatric care. Nationally, the Children's Health Insurance Program, enacted by the 1997 Balanced Budget Act, is improving coverage of children of the working- and near-poor who have been ineligible for Medicaid.

Accepted for publication May 9, 2002.

The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

What This Paper Adds

Only a few studies have shown a correlation between well-child care visits and indicators of health such as avoidable hospitalizations or ED use. Even fewer studies have shown a positive health benefit of compliance with the recommended pediatric guidelines for health supervision. This study provides evidence that compliance with health supervision guidelines during infancy is associated with a decrease in incidence of ED visits in general. The results of this study provide further support of the role of early health supervision in preventing unnecessary morbidity. The implication is that no child in the United States should be without preventive care.

Corresponding author: Rosemarie B. Hakim, PhD, CMS c3-19-07, 7500 Security Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21244 (e-mail: rhakim@CMS.hhs.gov).

Casey  PSharp  MLoda  F Child-health supervision for children under 2 years of age: a review of its content and effectiveness. J Pediatr. 1979;951- 9Article
American Academy of Pediatrics, News and Comments. Recommendations for Preventive Health Care of Children and Youth. Vol 25 Evanston, Ill American Academy of Pediatrics1974;No. 6
American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines for Health Supervision III.  American Academy of Pediatrics Publications. Elk Grove Village, Ill American Academy of Pediatrics1997;
Montgomery  LEKiely  JLPappas  G The effects of poverty, race, and family structure on US children's health: data from the NHIS, 1978 through 1980 and 1989 through 1991. Am J Public Health. 1996;861401- 1405Article
Dubos  RJ Mirage of Health: Utopias, Progress, and Biological Change.  New York, NY Harper& Row Publications Inc1959;
House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Healthy Children, Investing in the Future.  Washington, DC House Committee on Energy and Commerce1988;
Newacheck  PWStarfield  B Morbidity and use of ambulatory care services among poor and nonpoor children. Am J Public Health. 1988;78927- 933Article
Kaestner  RRacine  AJoyce  T Did recent expansions in Medicaid narrow socioeconomic differences in hospitalization rates of infants? Med Care. 2000;38195- 206Article
McConnochie  KMRoghmann  KJLiptak  GS Socioeconomic variation in discretionary and mandatory hospitalization of infants: an ecologic analysis. Pediatrics. 1997;99774- 784Article
Halfon  NNewacheck  PWWood  DLSt Peter  RF Routine emergency department use for sick care by children in the United States. Pediatrics. 1996;9828- 34
Hakim  RBBye  BV Effectiveness of compliance with pediatric preventive care guidelines among Medicaid beneficiaries. Pediatrics. 2001;10890- 97Article
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) public-use data file. Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/elec_prods/subject/mihs.htmAccessed July 8, 2002
Miller  JEGaboda  DDavis  D Early childhood chronic illness: comparability of maternal reports and medical records. Vital Health Stat. 2001;2131
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1991 Longitudinal Follow up to the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey public-use data files. Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/elec_prods/subject/lfnmihs.htm#mpsAccessed July 8, 2002
Frankenburg  WK Early and periodic screening: diagnosis and treatment program. Pediatrics. 1988;81467- 468
Ronsaville  DSHakim  RB Well-child care in the United States: racial differences in compliance with guidelines. Am J Public Health. 2000;901436- 1443Article
Gadomski  AJenkins  PNichols  M Impact of a Medicaid primary care provider and preventive care on pediatric hospitalization. Pediatrics [serial online]. 1998;101E1Available at:http://www.pediatrics.orgAccessed July 8, 2002
Christakis  DAMell  LKoepsell  TDEmerson  SConnell  FA Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children. Pediatrics. 2001;107524- 529Article
Shah  BVBarnwell  BGBieler  GS SUDAAN User's Manual: Software for Analysis of Correlated Data. Release 6.4 Research Triangle Park, NC Research Triangle Institute1995;
Kotelchuck  M The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health. 1994;841486- 1489Article
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Healthier mothers and babies. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48849- 858
Newacheck  PWHalfon  N Preventive use by school-age children: differences by socioeconomic status. Pediatrics. 1988;82462- 468
Pappas  GHadden  WCKozak  LJFisher  GF Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups. Am J Public Health. 1997;87811- 816Article
Szilagyi  PGHoll  JLRodewald  LE  et al.  Evaluation of Children's Health Insurance: From New York State's Child Health Plus to SCHIP. Pediatrics. 2000;105363- 371Article
Sharma  VSimon  SDBakewell  JMEllerbeck  EFFox  MHWallace  DD Factors influencing infant visits to emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2000;1061031- 1039Article
Baker  DWStevens  CDBrook  RH Regular source of ambulatory care and medical care utilization by patients presenting to a public hospital emergency department. JAMA. 1994;2711909- 1912Article
Piehl  MDClemens  CJJoines  JD "Narrowing the gap": decreasing emergency department use by children enrolled in the Medicaid program by improving access to primary care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154791- 795Article
Freed  GLClark  SJPathman  DESchectman  R Influences on the receipt of well-child visits in the first two years of life. Pediatrics. 1999;103864- 869
Strobino  DKeane  VHolt  EHughart  NGuyer  B Parental attitudes do not explain underimmunization. Pediatrics. 1996;981076- 1083
Cornelius  LJ Barriers to medical care for white, black, and Hispanic American children. J Natl Med Assoc. 1993;85281- 288
Cohen  JWCunningham  PJ Medicaid physician fee levels and children's access to care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1995;14255- 262Article
Riportella-Muller  RSelby-Harrington  MLRichardson  LADonat  PLLuchok  KJQuade  D Barriers to the use of preventive health care services for children. Public Health Rep. 1996;11171- 77
Moore  PHepworth  JT Use of perinatal and infant health services by Mexican-American Medicaid enrollees. JAMA. 1994;272297- 304Article
Wood  DDonald-Sherbourne  CHalfon  N  et al.  Factors related to immunization status among inner-city Latino and African-American preschoolers. Pediatrics. 1995;96295- 301
Bobo  JKGale  JLThapa  PBWassilak  SG Risk factors for delayed immunization in a random sample of 1163 children from Oregon and Washington. Pediatrics. 1993;91308- 314
Moore  PFenlon  NHepworth  JT Indicators of differences in immunization rates of Mexican American and white non-Hispanic infants in a Medicaid managed care system. Public Health Nurs. 1996;1321- 30Article
Snowden  LRLibby  AThomas  K Health care–related attitudes and utilization among African American women. Women's Health. 1997;3301- 314
Gary  FCampbell  DSerlin  C African American women: disparities in health care. J Fla Med Assoc. 1996;83489- 493
Abbotts  BOsborn  LM Immunization status and reasons for immunization delay among children using public health immunization clinics. AJDC. 1993;147965- 968